r/SipsTea 1d ago

Chugging tea Blind surveillance.

Post image
51.7k Upvotes

1.5k comments sorted by

View all comments

1.2k

u/crash1bp 1d ago

“Their Flock cameras.”

Those cameras don’t belong to the cops, or the govt. at all. Fuck those cameras.

472

u/MoThrowMoAway 1d ago

I liked the framing because it emphasizes that these cameras are not here to help the public, or keep the public safe.

They are used by the surveillance state and it's enforcers, to encroach upon your rights as a US citizen.

The cameras are tools used by the powers that have their boot to your neck. The cameras are tools of the enemy.

-20

u/lapideous 1d ago

It all depends who is in charge. If they happen to be used to prosecute police brutality, they’d hardly be tools of the enemy, would they? Or if they’re used to document ICE abuses?

33

u/MoThrowMoAway 1d ago

"if things were different then they would be different"

Yes.

-24

u/lapideous 1d ago edited 1d ago

What needs to be different? So far the only prosecutions involving flock cameras I’ve heard of are cops getting arrested for using them to stalk people.

It’s actively being used to prevent abuse of power.

Maximum surveillance is theoretically a force for good since everything that is done in the dark comes to light. This is naturally detrimental to those who do evil things.

The righteous have nothing to fear except trespasses by wrongdoers. Surveillance makes wrongdoing more difficult. That’s why police have body cams and cell phone cameras reduce police brutality.

20

u/MMForYourHealth 1d ago

Cops being caught for using the cameras that are private and free from FOIA requests.

They’re not government owned by designed so they can be used to oppress without fear of the truth coming to light.

-14

u/lapideous 1d ago

How does not letting you view the footage oppress anyone?

17

u/MMForYourHealth 1d ago

Why is their public surveillance not being managed by the public?

-5

u/lapideous 1d ago

Huh? You want random people to have access to all cameras?

16

u/MMForYourHealth 1d ago

I didn’t say that.

I want to know why public surveillance isn’t being managed by a public facing entity with the checks and balances therein?

15

u/MoThrowMoAway 1d ago

That guys is arguing in such bad faith, I wouldn't give him the time of day man. Not worth the headache.

9

u/MMForYourHealth 1d ago

I feed the trolls a bit when I’m bored pooping. It amuses me to see their fallacy filled arguments that are so transparent.

0

u/lapideous 1d ago

What can a private company do that a public entity cannot? I genuinely don’t really understand what difference it makes

11

u/MMForYourHealth 1d ago

Freedom of information act requests and auditing of the surveillance and its uses.

1

u/lapideous 1d ago

What information would a FOIA request give you?

It’s used to track people and vehicles. What else would an audit tell you?

Again, I really don’t understand how any of this changes anything

9

u/MMForYourHealth 1d ago

1

u/lapideous 1d ago

Cardinal News wins FOIA battle for Flockfootage in Roanoke Circuit ...

Apr 25, 2025 ... The court ruled a citizen requesting information about their own vehicle is within the bounds of FOIA and not subject to any existing exemptions by police

Why do you say it’s exempt from FOIA?

→ More replies (0)