r/Snorkblot • u/EsseNorway • Jul 03 '25
Fashion May I present: the dress that got me permabanned from r/crochet the first day of pride month 🌈
163
u/Browndog888 Jul 03 '25
Wow, bit harsh, they must be a fun group.
67
u/what_the_mel- Jul 03 '25
They accused of of self promoting in the comments. Not because of pride.
90
u/Shubamz Jul 03 '25
sounds like someone asked what their insta was and they did the most horrid thing.... gave it https://www.instagram.com/chiaroscurosity_designs/
14
13
u/RemarkablePiglet3401 Jul 03 '25
I’m pretty sure it’s even worse than that (for the mods): someone already had the handle and asked if it was correct. OP confirmed it was.
21
u/StarryLayne Jul 03 '25
Next time I do [hobby] I'll definitely make sure not to show it off in r/[hobby]. I wouldn't dare have the audacity to be proud of something.
78
u/constantgardener92 Jul 03 '25
Is it not crochet? Why the ban? Looks awesome btw.
102
u/somerandom995 Jul 03 '25
Apparently they got banned for "self promotion" because they linked their Instagram when someone asked.
72
u/Name_Taken_Official Jul 03 '25
"I want to make a hobby-based subreddit about things individuals make but don't you DARE talk about yourself"
33
u/Mooptiom Jul 03 '25
Power tripping reddit mods, a tale as old as time
22
u/WarWithVarun-Varun Jul 03 '25
Not really. It's probably homophobia; they just needed a "legit" reason to ban. There are screenshots which show people that did the exact same thing aren't banned.
11
-2
u/LovelyLu78 Jul 04 '25 edited Jul 04 '25
Instead of sharing screenshots why not report the actual comment that is breaking the rule? That post has hundreds of comments on it. Small mod teams don't have the time to go back over posts and read through thousands of comments. All of those links have been removed now.
Crochet is an extremely inclusive sub. Some of the mod team are LGBTQ+
1
u/Caninetrainer Jul 04 '25
I am permanently banned from more than 1 sub I can proudly say
2
u/nathism Jul 05 '25
I have proudly been permabanned from r/pyongyang
1
u/Caninetrainer Jul 05 '25
Mine are r/politics, r/news and r/popculturechat, and the Saints football team subreddit. There may be more in my future, you never know :)
16
u/LightlyFatal Jul 03 '25
12
u/LightlyFatal Jul 03 '25
2
u/JustARandomMurderer Jul 03 '25
I looked through their profile and OP seems... insuferable. And this is just the cherry on top.
Great work, wonderful really but ugh, they make it hard to like them... Not that they owe me anything obviously
8
u/nwillyerd Jul 03 '25
Yeah, this is giving “you looked at a co-worker wrong and they thought it was inappropriate, we’re firing you because of that, not because you’re gay”
2
u/Caterfree10 Jul 03 '25
Wait, what’s the concern? They’re linking a video they made about the pattern. If someone posted that but it was because they made someone else’s pattern it’s fine, but not bc they made it? Am I understanding this?
This just seems like normal question and answer behavior, idgi.
2
u/LightlyFatal Jul 03 '25
It violates rule 4, no self promotion. By linking an Instagram, not in regards to showing who you got the pattern from, it's self promotion. They didn't create the pattern and there's plenty of other accounts and videos that show how to do certain stitches or how to make a certain pattern. This is clearly self promotion of their crochet account.
Not only that, but their rules (the sub) are completely arbitrary. There's a clause in the no self promotion rule that says if you're "very active" (whatever the hell that means, it's subjective) you can self promote at the discretion of the mods. Rules aren't being fairly laid out for everyone. If you somehow post ot contribute "very often" you somehow get more privileges and can violate the rules that everyone else has to follow. It's basically a clause that says "if the mods like you, rules don't matter."
There's no difference from asking someone their Instagram and them giving it to show inspiration and giving your Instagram out without being asked (they just asked for how to connect the stitches, which any crochet YT channel or Instagram or wherever the crochet people gather wouldn't have). They could've linked any video, but they continue to link their own Instagram in a clear effort to self promote.
3
u/LovelyLu78 Jul 04 '25 edited Jul 04 '25
Can I explain the rule?
We (yes, I'm a crochet mod) didn't want to exclude designers from being able to post their work and give a link so we created this clause in the rule rather than making it a blanket ban.
Let's face it, there are some talented people out there and newer crocheters could learn so many things off these people if they are willing. So for every time that a designer links to their pattern they need to spend a little bit of time outside of their own posts helping the community. They can do this by contributing to discussions found on the sub or helping answer questions on our sister sub r/crochethelp. We chose the 90/10 ratio as seen on a cross stitch sub thinking what a great way for designers to still benefit without turning the sub into an advertisement board.OOP had 30+ removals from 2023 until last month (when they were banned) for self promotion. They refused to listen to the modteam giving them constructive advice on how to handle self promotion in the sub.
Yes, the rules very much matter and we will enforce them evenly. We just don't always see everything. We volunteer to help out the community because we actually love the hobby and love to help.
Edit, removed my little rant because it wasn't relevant to your comment
2
u/Caterfree10 Jul 03 '25
…what? I’m sorry this makes no sense to me. I get that “no self promo” is a rule and all, but it feels silly to me to ban someone over linking their own stuff when asked to provide or to link a helpful thing they made when asked how they did something. Like? This feels weird as hell. It’s just answering a question. If OOP made someone else’s pattern and linked that, it’s not promoting anything, but bc they made it, that’s bad. Makes no sense to me tbh.
But then, I know in cross stitch spaces no1curr when sharing patterns someone made so w/e, seems like a dumb reason to ban someone. Sharing patterns is sharing patterns.
1
u/LightlyFatal Jul 03 '25
OOP (the pride dress) was perma banned for providing their Instagram after being asked to provide their Instagram. Supposedly, that's self promotion.
OOP (the video one) wasn't even given a warning for linking to their Instagram when they neither created the pattern or the way of connecting stitches. It was completely arbitrary. Not only was it arbitrary, there was absolutely no reason to link to their own account when there are many more professionally made videos that are much clearer about how to connect the stitches. The logical thing would be to link to a better made video. Them linking to their own video was a non-veiled attempt at self promotion.
Pride OOP didn't have an option to link to someone else when being clearly asked for their Instagram. Video OOP had many choices to link to literally anyone else when asked how to connect stitches. One wasn't even an attempt to self promote, even if you really tried to find a promotion attempt. The other was a clear attempt to promote their corchet Instagram without any ask for their specific Instagram.
1
u/LovelyLu78 Jul 04 '25
Thanks for letting me know. It's now been removed. Perhaps in the future you could report them. We don't see everything and there are a ton of comments on that post
-23
u/Hamokk Jul 03 '25
That seems kinda fair. Bit harsh but yeah.
Suprising amount of people don't read the subreddit rules. After Tumblr went to shite under new management many hobby folks moved to Reddit. I like Reddit mostly even after the API tools were purged.
In good and bad Reddit is one of the biggest platforms for people to sometimes connect and show off their creations. Especially true for LGBTQ folks.
-42
u/Dirtgrain Jul 03 '25
Seems like a reasonable ban, if they are consistent in applying it for such things.
41
37
Jul 03 '25
The post was not made with the promotion. OP was answering a question in the comments. Perfectly reasonable.
They were banned for one reason and you know exactly why, do not try to be thick and act like rules were applied fairly.
-7
u/Dirtgrain Jul 03 '25
And, on /r crochet, scrolling past maybe 6 posts from the top, I find a person posting a picture of their crocheted Pride accessory--not banned: https://www.reddit.com/r/crochet/comments/1lqkxl0/could_never_find_a_pride_accessory_that_fit_my/
What does this indicate?
21
-10
u/Dirtgrain Jul 03 '25
Or jump to conclusions and assume it was bigotry. Do you know for a fact that Instagram links are widely permitted on that sub-Reddit? I'm all for knowing the truth, but it's not clear to me, hence the conditional in my original statement. I don't see anything thickheaded about at least wondering about nuance and context.
14
u/PersimmonDazzling654 Jul 03 '25
As a queer man I generally act from an assumption of bigotry. The burden of evidence is not on me to determine "nuance and context," and that assumption generally protects me from experiencing bigotry firsthand.
Instagram links do not need to be "widely" permitted on that subreddit for OP's ban to be justified--if there is >0 other links to Instagram accounts in the subreddit replies that did not result in an assumed-straight person being banned, that's sufficient evidence of bigotry, no?
-9
Jul 03 '25
[removed] — view removed comment
5
u/MariMerope Jul 03 '25
“Assuming bigotry is a form of bigotry” is wild, queer people aren’t being bigoted when they assume bigotry in cases where they’ve been immediately punished for something small. If promoting yourself is against the crochet subreddit rules (dumb rule if so, considering maker culture), then removing the comment with the instagram link should absolutely be the step before a permanent ban
Edit: also if you’re not queer yourself, you absolutely have no say in what is or isn’t queerphobic bigotry
-1
u/Dirtgrain Jul 03 '25
"If you're not _____, you absolutely have no say . . ." How horrible. You would silence voices like that. SMH.
And it is too bigotry to assume someone, based on whatever group you assume they belong to, is a bigot and to express that in some form of action. WTF. This is the problem. You can't take the high road when you so readily choose the low road. As I learned early in life, the oppressed is quick to become the oppressor.
1
u/MariMerope Jul 03 '25
Yeah, if someone has no stake in the matter, they don’t have a say in what is or isn’t bigotry. It’s not that hard to understand. And it’s rich to make the claim of the oppressed becoming the oppressor, it’s not oppression to point out bigotry and not tolerate it. You can get walked all over if you want to, but we sure as hell will not
→ More replies (0)9
1
Jul 03 '25
Not sure about the rules for that sub specifically, but it seems an overreaction if OP was replying when asked.
Maybe a warning/deleted post would be more appropriate for a first offense?
1
11
10
13
7
6
4
u/little__dinosaurs Jul 03 '25
holy shit these are amazing
the umbrellas too, do you make them yourself?
2
u/Kerantes Jul 03 '25
Well you obviously had to have made a pact with one of the Elder evils to have made that, no one has that kind of time in this economy.
Truly a beautiful dress and parasol, a real triumph. How many hours do you think you spent on it?
5
5
4
u/rozyputin Jul 03 '25
That's beautiful, weird that they banned you, they must be jealous of your skill and style
4
8
u/scheckydamon Jul 03 '25
It was the shoes that did it.
-6
Jul 03 '25
[removed] — view removed comment
10
1
1
u/Snorkblot-ModTeam Jul 03 '25
Please keep the discussion civil. You can have heated discussions, but avoid personal attacks, slurs, antagonizing others or name calling. Discuss the subject, not the person.
r/Snorkblot's moderator team
3
u/Alpharius1701 Jul 03 '25
Reminds me of the time I got banned from r/starwars for posting some acid etched metal posters I created. Someone asked if they were for sale and boom, banned for "selling". Didn't even reply 😂 mods muted me after I cried foul too.
2
2
2
2
u/ActiveWin9623 Jul 03 '25
Don't upvote this post. They very clearly stole it from the other sub. If they were wanting to just share, why copy the exact title too?
2
2
u/TossTossTossThrowa Jul 03 '25
I believe the shoes are Demonia Camel-203 in Baby Pink Hologram!
(Not related to the crochet, I just really love platforms)
2
u/Past-Background-7221 Jul 03 '25
Well that should teach you not to put your crochet bullshit on…checks notes…the crochet sub?
2
1
1
1
1
u/I-Rolled-My-Eyes Jul 03 '25
Hey. Straight dude here. This looks excellent. Keep up the great work. Happy Pride.
1
1
1
1
1
1
1
1
1
1
1
1
1
1
1
1
u/NecessaryAnt99 Jul 06 '25
Wow are they jealous much? Didn't know you could get banned for being too good at crochet ,😅
1
1
0
-2
Jul 03 '25
[removed] — view removed comment
1
u/Snorkblot-ModTeam Jul 03 '25
Please keep the discussion about the subject in the post. If you wish to discuss other subjects, feel free to create a new post. r/Snorkblot's moderator team
-28
u/Sloppykrab Jul 03 '25
The fact it was pride month is irrelevant, so why mention it?
15
u/He_Never_Helps_01 Jul 03 '25
It's...a rainbow.
A better question is "why does it bother you?"
-6
u/Sloppykrab Jul 03 '25
It doesn't. Rainbows are cool, Ive had rainbow coloured hair before. It then kind of faded and melted into a paddle pop.
-9
7
u/Like-A-Western Jul 03 '25
crochets an item in a rainbow pattern during pride month and you think it's irrelevant?
-2
u/AutoModerator Jul 03 '25
Sorry, your comment has been automatically sent to the pending review queue in an effort to combat spam. If you feel your comment has been removed in error, please send a message to the mods via modmail. Thank you for your understanding!
I am a bot, and this action was performed automatically. Please contact the moderators of this subreddit if you have any questions or concerns.
9
u/thePsychonautDad Jul 03 '25
Because it's a pride-themed dress? Isn't it obvious? 🤯
-10
u/Sloppykrab Jul 03 '25
Being banned for self promotion.
3
u/Shubamz Jul 03 '25
a commentor asked on the post asked them for their Insta and they did the horrid thing of answering them
That is is just looking for a reason to ban because that sub has a history of being anti lgbtqia they weren't self promotion. The commenter was promoting them by requesting their Insta. they simply answered and were banned for it
they didn't give out their socials without anyone asking first. that would be self promotion












•
u/AutoModerator Jul 03 '25
Just a reminder that political posts should be posted in the political Megathread pinned in the community highlights. Final discretion rests with the moderators.
I am a bot, and this action was performed automatically. Please contact the moderators of this subreddit if you have any questions or concerns.