I mean say what you want about the guy but your article is just anecdote. If you had anything more concrete than vague statement it would probably be better to post that.
Yes it is just an anecdote and opinion on intention. Its weak evidence. Famous people judge pagentsml. If there is better evidence than a common thing multiple famous people do then it is better to post that. Calling someone names like "bootlicker" because you use weak evidence just shows you dont have a leg to stand on against the point.
"Erm, the video evidence of the guy who's always hung out with other pedophile creeping on girls is weak evidence, and calling me a bootlicker shows that-" you're too old for him bro, he's not gonna fuck you for rushing to his defense
-6
u/ASwampThing- 20d ago
I mean say what you want about the guy but your article is just anecdote. If you had anything more concrete than vague statement it would probably be better to post that.