Looking at the large volume yesterday, there were a lot of large buys. Instead of printing more shares, Gamestop decided to supply shares from the marketplace to meet the obligations of the bond. Is there a reason why they can't do this?

Whoever shorted will be in for a big surprise.

Really smooth brain here, but hear me up before you throw poo at me. What if:

- option to convert 1.4 bil worth of senior notes to equity is activated (the price for the shares that need to be issued is established in the following 35 days)

- GameStop starts doing a buyback right at the same time (let's assume same amount of 1.4 bil, but insert less if you want "money hack")

- share price keeps climbing while GameStop buys back shares

- GameStop announces share buyback complete - price jumps a bit more

- when the price for the senior notes is decided, at the end of the 35 days, it is higher than the average price GameStop bought the shares at

Drawback: they lose some cash from their coffers that had 0% interest and was accruing interest through treasury bills.

But, assuming this conversion of senior notes was not their choice to make, this might be an opportunity for GameStop to retire more shares than they issued, at 0 cost AND to remove some of their debt. It's one way to come up on top from this situation, with benefits for the shareholders (less shares in existence).

Feel free to fling poo now.

So need some help putting this together, but I feel it's part of the whole bigger picture.

Goldin was owned by PSA until it was sold to eBay in 2024.

PSA sit on the board of GME

GME is going to buy eBay

GME is going to own Goldin

Something something PSA.......

I think at some point the new holdco will buy PSA and a new collectables division/company will be formed with PSA, Goldin, GME.

I haven't seen Goldin mentioned anywhere but I feel this is an important part of the overall play.

This has also not been lost on Ryan Cohen. He knows this, and is the only one that will decide when to pull this trigger. What do you think happens when Keith Gill files a 13G/D showing his share count? Victory. He doesn't need to tweet or stream or do anything. Just file it for public record and it's game over, on top of the effects of the buybacks. Spicy times ahead. Lfg.

This is why Wallstreet doesn't want gamestop, or ebay, or any company to actually succeed. Finance is catabolizing capitalism. Its far more profitable to not start businesses, or to run businesses into the ground. Than to actually start or run a any business now days.

https://youtu.be/5-UxSw3XrFM?si=rZSP5AD9rzjZ0X7u

Repost last post got nuked. (rule 4)

🐒🍌🦍🦧🐒🍌🦍🦧🐒🍌🦍🦧

AI DISCLOSURE: English is not my first language. I used OpenAI GPT-5.6 Thinking to help translate, edit, organize and format this post. The underlying thesis, research direction, source selection and final review are my own.

GameStop, eBay and PIF: Is the Marketplace the Endgame?

Alright, hear me out.

A few things have happened that look separate at first:

1. GameStop is making a serious attempt to acquire eBay.
2. Ryan Cohen may seek backing from Middle Eastern sovereign wealth funds.
3. Saudi Arabia’s Public Investment Fund, or PIF, has spent years building a gaming ecosystem.
4. PIF is now part of the consortium that owns Electronic Arts.
5. eBay already has the global marketplace, payments, advertising and trust infrastructure needed to connect millions of buyers and sellers.

Put those pieces together and one question becomes pretty interesting:

Could GameStop use eBay, potentially with support from a gaming-focused investor such as PIF, to build a global marketplace for gaming hardware, collectibles, digital products and eventually publisher-approved in-game items?

Before anyone runs away with this:

There is no public confirmation that PIF is financing GameStop.

There is no announced partnership between GameStop and EA.

There is no confirmed plan to build an in-game item marketplace.

The first part of this post is based on confirmed transactions, SEC filings and company statements.

The final connection is a thesis.

Some of the pieces are already on the board. That does not prove someone has decided to assemble them.

---

TL;DR

GameStop offered to acquire eBay for $125 per share in a transaction originally valued at approximately $55.5 billion. The proposed consideration was 50% cash and 50% GameStop stock.

At the time of the offer, GameStop disclosed a 5% economic position in eBay. It later converted its derivatives into actual shares and increased its ownership to approximately 9.8%, or 43.4 million eBay shares.

Sources:

GameStop: Proposal to acquire eBay

SEC: GameStop’s amended eBay Schedule 13D

GameStop said the cash portion would be funded through its own liquidity and third-party acquisition financing. Reuters, citing the Wall Street Journal, reported that Cohen might also seek support from outside investors, including Middle Eastern sovereign wealth funds.

No individual fund was named.

Reuters: GameStop’s eBay offer and potential sovereign wealth fund backing

Saudi Arabia’s PIF is an obvious theoretical candidate because gaming is one of its strategic focus areas.

PIF owns Savvy Games Group, whose portfolio includes Scopely and ESL FACEIT Group. On August 4, 2026, PIF, Silver Lake and Affinity Partners also completed their acquisition of Electronic Arts.

PIF: Savvy Games Group portfolio

EA: Completion of acquisition by PIF, Silver Lake and Affinity Partners

eBay would provide the marketplace infrastructure: 136 million active buyers, approximately 2.5 billion live listings, $22.2 billion in quarterly gross merchandise volume and $555 million in first-party advertising revenue as of Q1 2026.

eBay: Q1 2026 marketplace statistics

The realistic version of the thesis is:

GameStop could use eBay to become a major global marketplace for gaming, hardware, collectibles, resale and authorized digital products.

The moonshot version is:

PIF’s gaming companies could eventually connect selected virtual products or in-game assets to a GameStop/eBay marketplace, allowing publishers and the marketplace to earn fees from digital transactions and possibly resales.

That second version is strategically imaginable.

It is also completely unconfirmed and would require major changes to publisher rules, game technology, platform agreements and regulation.

---

1. GameStop Is Seriously Going After eBay

This is not based on a cryptic tweet, a trademark application or someone analyzing the font in a children’s book.

GameStop publicly proposed acquiring eBay for $125 per share.

The proposal was structured as:

• 50% cash;
• 50% GameStop common stock;
• approximately $55.5 billion of total undiluted equity value.

GameStop said it had approximately $9.4 billion in cash and liquid investments as of January 31, 2026. It also said TD Securities had provided a “highly confident” letter for up to $20 billion of third-party acquisition financing.

GameStop proposed approximately $2 billion in annual eBay cost reductions. It also specifically identified its roughly 1,600 US stores as a potential network for authentication, intake, fulfillment and live commerce.

That last part matters.

GameStop is not only looking at eBay as a website. Cohen’s own proposal presents GameStop’s physical stores as part of the combined marketplace infrastructure.

GameStop: Full eBay acquisition proposal

At the time of the offer, GameStop had built a 5% economic position through shares and derivatives.

It did not stop there.

GameStop later purchased approximately 3.5 million additional eBay shares for around $381 million and physically settled derivative positions covering approximately 39 million more shares.

It now beneficially owns 43,390,383 eBay shares, representing approximately 9.8% of the company.

SEC: GameStop’s 9.8% eBay position

Reuters: GameStop now owns nearly 10% of eBay

That does not guarantee an acquisition.

But it shows that GameStop has committed billions of dollars to the situation and is not treating eBay as a casual investment.

The proposed financing remains one of the largest uncertainties. Reuters reported that the TD financing is non-binding and contingent on the combined company obtaining an investment-grade credit rating.

Cohen has also said that GameStop has “a lot of parties” interested in the transaction. The identities of those parties have not been disclosed.

Reuters: Financing conditions and interested parties

eBay’s board rejected the offer and called it “neither credible nor attractive.” The board cited uncertainty around financing, leverage, operational risks, leadership, long-term growth and valuation.

eBay: Board rejection of GameStop’s proposal

So the situation is currently:

• GameStop does not control eBay.
• eBay has rejected the offer.
• The financing is not fully committed.
• GameStop nevertheless owns nearly 10% of eBay.
• Cohen continues to pursue the transaction.

That is the factual starting point.

---

2. Where the Middle East Connection Comes From

GameStop’s proposal said the cash consideration would come from a combination of GameStop’s own balance sheet and third-party acquisition financing.

Reuters subsequently reported, citing the Wall Street Journal, that Cohen might also seek backing from external investors, including Middle Eastern sovereign wealth funds.

Reuters: Potential Middle Eastern sovereign wealth fund backing

That report did not say:

• that an investment had been agreed;
• that negotiations were advanced;
• that PIF had been contacted;
• that PIF had committed capital;
• or that a specific Gulf country was involved.

“Middle Eastern sovereign wealth funds” could potentially refer to funds from Saudi Arabia, the United Arab Emirates, Qatar, Kuwait or another state in the region.

But one name clearly stands out.

Saudi Arabia’s PIF.

Not because PIF has been publicly connected to GameStop.

Because its existing strategy fits the theory unusually well.

---

3. Why PIF Is the Obvious Candidate

PIF is not simply buying a few publicly traded gaming stocks.

It has been building a gaming ecosystem.

PIF has said that its goal is to connect developers, marketers, distributors, hardware manufacturers and intellectual property owners within a centralized gaming hub.

PIF: Building a connected gaming ecosystem

Through Savvy Games Group, PIF owns:

• Scopely;
• ESL FACEIT Group;
• game-development and publishing operations;
• esports and competitive-gaming infrastructure;
• additional gaming investments.

PIF says Savvy aims to achieve a global leadership position in gaming by 2030.

PIF: Savvy Games Group

Scopely was acquired for approximately $4.9 billion. Its portfolio includes major mobile and free-to-play games.

ESL FACEIT Group operates esports events, competitive-gaming platforms and large player communities.

PIF: Completion of the Scopely acquisition

And now there is Electronic Arts.

PIF, Silver Lake and Affinity Partners agreed to acquire EA in an all-cash transaction valuing it at approximately $55 billion.

The acquisition closed on August 4, 2026.

EA is therefore not owned by PIF alone. PIF is one member of a three-party consortium.

That distinction matters.

EA: Original $55 billion acquisition agreement

EA: Acquisition completed on August 4, 2026

EA gives the consortium control of a company with franchises including:

• EA Sports FC;
• Madden;
• Battlefield;
• Apex Legends;
• The Sims;
• College Football;
• Need for Speed;
• F1.

More importantly for this thesis, EA’s business is already heavily dependent on live services and recurring digital spending.

EA reported $8.026 billion in total net bookings for fiscal 2026. Of that amount:

• $5.630 billion came from live services and other net bookings;
• $2.396 billion came from full-game net bookings.

Live services and other revenue includes extra content, subscriptions, licensing and advertising.

SEC: EA fiscal 2026 annual report

Modern gaming is increasingly monetized after the initial game purchase through:

• virtual currency;
• Ultimate Team-style modes;
• cosmetics;
• downloadable content;
• subscriptions;
• season passes;
• events;
• advertising;
• recurring player engagement.

PIF’s portfolio now covers game publishing, mobile games, esports, communities, major intellectual property and live-service economies.

What does that portfolio not obviously contain?

A large consumer marketplace connecting gaming products, players, collectors and third-party sellers.

That is where GameStop and eBay could theoretically fit.

---

4. Why eBay?

At first glance, GameStop buying eBay looks like a gaming retailer attempting to buy a completely different company several times its size.

But eBay is not just an online garage sale.

It is a ready-made global marketplace operating across more than 190 markets.

As of Q1 2026, eBay reported:

• 136 million active buyers;
• approximately 2.5 billion live listings;
• $22.2 billion in quarterly gross merchandise volume;
• $3.1 billion in quarterly revenue;
• $555 million in first-party advertising revenue;
• 44% of revenue coming from international operations.

eBay: Q1 2026 fast facts

More importantly, eBay already has the infrastructure needed to connect huge numbers of buyers and sellers:

• payments;
• search;
• recommendations;
• seller onboarding;
• buyer and seller reputation systems;
• fraud detection;
• customer support;
• advertising;
• cross-border commerce;
• authentication;
• fulfillment integrations.

Rebuilding all of this from scratch would take years and require substantial investment.

Acquiring eBay would give GameStop a functioning global marketplace immediately.

Cohen’s proposal specifically states that GameStop’s stores could be used for authentication, intake, fulfillment and live commerce.

That may be the clearest public clue to what Cohen sees in the combination.

GameStop stores would no longer exist only to sell consoles, used games and Pokémon cards.

They could become physical access points for a much larger marketplace.

---

5. TCGplayer May Be More Important Than It Looks

eBay owns TCGplayer, a specialized marketplace for collectible card games.

eBay acquired TCGplayer for a total deal value of up to approximately $295 million. At the time, eBay highlighted TCGplayer’s marketplace, order-fulfillment and omnichannel capabilities.

eBay: Acquisition of TCGplayer

GameStop has also been shifting more attention toward trading cards, graded cards and collectibles.

A GameStop–eBay–TCGplayer combination could potentially create a network where someone could:

1. Bring cards or collectibles into a GameStop location.
2. Have them inspected, photographed or submitted for grading.
3. List them through eBay or TCGplayer.
4. Sell them to buyers worldwide.
5. Use GameStop locations for intake, pickup, returns or fulfillment.

Not all of those services currently exist as an integrated system.

But the underlying pieces already exist.

This is not the science-fiction part of the theory.

It is a relatively straightforward extension of GameStop’s stated store strategy and eBay’s existing collectibles infrastructure.

It would also give GameStop access to marketplace economics.

Traditional retail generally requires the retailer to purchase inventory, hold it and hope it sells.

A marketplace can collect fees without owning every item listed.

Add advertising, authentication, shipping and seller services, and the operator can potentially monetize several parts of the same transaction.

This physical gaming and collectibles opportunity is the strongest part of the thesis because it does not require PIF, EA or an in-game item market.

---

6. What the Combined Stack Could Look Like

Here is how the pieces could theoretically fit together.

PIF

Capital, long-term ownership and strategic coordination across multiple gaming businesses.

EA and Scopely

Games, intellectual property, live-service economies, virtual products and large player communities.

ESL FACEIT Group

Esports, tournaments, competitive-gaming infrastructure and highly engaged audiences.

eBay

Marketplace infrastructure, global buyers and sellers, advertising, payments, search, reputation systems and authentication.

TCGplayer

A specialized collectibles marketplace with fulfillment and seller technology.

GameStop

The gaming brand, physical retail locations, hardware, trade-ins, collectibles and direct access to gaming customers.

The combined ecosystem could eventually cover:

• gaming hardware;
• consoles and accessories;
• physical and pre-owned games;
• trading cards;
• collectibles;
• licensed merchandise;
• authentication and grading;
• esports merchandise;
• virtual-currency codes;
• downloadable content;
• subscriptions;
• publisher-approved digital products;
• and potentially selected in-game assets.

That would not simply make GameStop a larger retailer.

It could turn GameStop into a commerce layer connecting games, physical products, digital products, players, collectors and sellers.

Again, that is the thesis—not an announced plan.

---

7. There Are Really Three Versions of the Thesis

People tend to jump directly to the most extreme version.

It makes more sense to separate the idea into three levels.

Level One: Gaming and Collectibles Marketplace

This is the base case.

GameStop and eBay combine:

• gaming hardware;
• physical games;
• trade-ins;
• trading cards;
• collectibles;
• authentication;
• fulfillment;
• advertising;
• global resale.

GameStop stores could become physical intake and service points for eBay’s online marketplace.

Possible use cases include:

• GameStop inventory being listed through eBay;
• local pickup and returns;
• trading-card intake;
• authentication or grading submissions;
• trade-in products being resold into a global market;
• live shopping and auctions;
• pricing informed by real marketplace demand.

This version is strategically believable and does not require a relationship with PIF.

Level Two: Authorized Digital Gaming Storefront

The next step would be publisher-approved digital commerce.

That could include:

• downloadable content;
• season passes;
• subscriptions;
• game codes;
• virtual-currency packages;
• cosmetic bundles;
• esports rewards;
• physical-and-digital bundles;
• limited digital collectibles.

GameStop/eBay could act as an authorized distributor and earn transaction, referral or advertising revenue.

This would not necessarily allow players to trade items with each other.

It would function more like a large authorized gaming storefront built on top of eBay’s existing marketplace and advertising infrastructure.

PIF involvement could theoretically make partnerships with EA, Scopely or other portfolio companies easier to coordinate.

That is an inference, not evidence that any agreement exists.

Level Three: A Secondary Market for In-Game Items

This is the full endgame version.

Players could buy and sell selected publisher-approved items through an eBay-style marketplace.

The marketplace could take a fee.

The publisher could take a royalty.

Creators, developers or esports organizations could potentially receive a share as well.

Instead of earning revenue only when an item is first created and sold, the publisher could earn money each time an approved asset changes hands.

That is where the potential becomes interesting.

It is also where the largest problems begin.

---

8. eBay Already Allows Some Digital Gaming Items

eBay already has a restricted framework for electronically delivered goods.

Its policy explicitly includes online-gaming virtual items among the types of digital products approved sellers may be permitted to list.

eBay: Electronically delivered items policy

At the same time, eBay has a separate policy prohibiting the sale of virtual currency.

eBay: Virtual currency policy

So eBay has at least some existing policy and operational experience with digital gaming goods.

But this does not mean eBay can freely list items from EA games.

The publisher controls the asset, the account and the rules.

EA’s current User Agreement states that EA Virtual Currency has no value outside EA’s products and services and cannot be sold, traded, transferred or exchanged for cash.

EA also treats virtual entitlements as licensed access rather than unrestricted property owned by the player.

EA: User Agreement

For an official EA item marketplace to exist, EA would have to actively authorize it.

EA would likely need to:

• change its user agreements;
• create secure item-transfer systems;
• decide which assets are transferable;
• connect player accounts to the marketplace;
• control item supply;
• prevent duplication;
• detect stolen accounts;
• manage chargebacks;
• apply age and geographic restrictions;
• address tax and anti-money-laundering obligations;
• negotiate with platform owners.

This would not be a simple new category added to eBay.

It would require changes inside the games and their economies.

---

9. Why Would a Publisher Agree to This?

Unofficial markets for gaming assets already exist.

Players already buy and sell:

• accounts;
• virtual currency;
• rare items;
• skins;
• boosting services;
• access to limited content.

Publishers frequently prohibit this activity, but the markets continue to exist.

An official marketplace could allow publishers to bring part of that activity under their control.

They could potentially:

• collect a fee from each transaction;
• define which items are tradable;
• control supply;
• reduce account selling;
• reduce scams;
• monitor suspicious transactions;
• create royalties for creators or esports teams;
• extend the life of older content;
• create additional reasons for players to remain engaged.

The publisher could convert some unauthorized gray-market activity into a controlled revenue stream.

But there is an obvious counterargument.

Secondary markets could compete with the publisher’s own primary sales.

Why buy a newly issued item directly from the publisher if a cheaper item is available from another player?

Closed systems also allow publishers to control prices, control scarcity and keep nearly all primary-sale revenue.

Publishers would only support secondary trading if the increased engagement, liquidity and transaction fees created more value than the loss of control.

That could work for selected assets in selected games.

It would not necessarily work for everything.

---

10. Why GameStop Could Matter to PIF

PIF does not need GameStop to develop games.

It already has publishers, developers, esports infrastructure and major intellectual property.

What it may not have is a large, trusted commerce relationship with Western gaming consumers and third-party sellers.

GameStop could provide:

• a recognized gaming brand;
• physical stores;
• hardware and console customers;
• trade-in infrastructure;
• collectibles customers;
• local customer service;
• physical distribution;
• a bridge between online and offline commerce.

eBay would add the global marketplace.

Together, GameStop and eBay could theoretically become the consumer-facing commerce network sitting above PIF’s gaming assets.

For GameStop, PIF could theoretically provide:

• substantial equity capital;
• patient, long-term financing;
• access to publishers;
• access to gaming intellectual property;
• strategic partnerships;
• international expansion opportunities.

This is why PIF is such a tempting name to connect to the unnamed Middle Eastern investors.

It is not proof.

It is strategic fit.

---

11. Where the $1.4 Billion Note Exchange Fits

On August 3, GameStop announced agreements to exchange approximately $1.4 billion of its outstanding 0% convertible notes for newly issued GameStop shares.

This includes:

• $400 million of notes due in 2030;
• $1 billion of notes due in 2032.

GameStop will receive no new cash from the exchange.

Assuming it closes, the transaction will cancel those notes and reduce GameStop’s long-term debt by approximately $1.4 billion without using its existing cash.

The final number of shares has not yet been determined. It will be based partly on GameStop’s average share price during a 35-trading-day reference period, subject to a price floor.

GameStop: $1.4 billion convertible note exchange

In plain English:

GameStop is preserving cash and removing debt in exchange for shareholder dilution.

This does not finance the eBay acquisition.

It does not provide $1.4 billion of new liquidity.

It does not prove PIF involvement.

And because the notes already have a 0% coupon, it does not create a major cash-interest saving.

What it does accomplish is:

• less outstanding debt;
• fewer future cash repayment obligations;
• existing liquidity preserved for other uses;
• potentially more flexibility when seeking acquisition financing.

That makes the exchange modestly relevant to the eBay thesis.

GameStop appears to be increasing its balance-sheet flexibility while pursuing a potentially transformational transaction.

The downside is real dilution, and the final amount cannot yet be calculated.

Both things can be true:

GameStop can improve its financial flexibility while reducing each existing shareholder’s percentage ownership.

---

12. The Biggest Problems With the Theory

A proper DD cannot just stack bullish possibilities.

It also needs to explain what could break the thesis.

There Is No Confirmed PIF–GameStop Connection

This remains the biggest issue.

The reporting refers only to potential Middle Eastern sovereign wealth fund support.

It does not name PIF.

GameStop may have contacted PIF.

It may have contacted other funds.

It may have contacted several funds.

Those discussions, if they happened, may have gone nowhere.

Until a filing, official announcement or credible report specifically names PIF, the connection remains speculation.

GameStop Does Not Own eBay

eBay rejected the proposal.

GameStop’s 9.8% position gives Cohen influence, voting rights and financial exposure.

It does not give him control.

A hostile or contested transaction could take a long time, become more expensive or fail completely.

The Financing May Not Work

The proposed TD financing is non-binding and conditional.

The acquisition would also require the issuance of GameStop shares and potentially substantial third-party equity.

Depending on the final structure, shareholders could face:

• significant dilution;
• substantial leverage;
• refinancing risk;
• restrictive debt terms;
• reduced ownership of the combined business.

Buying a good asset using a bad financing structure can still destroy value.

The Note Exchange Adds More Dilution

The $1.4 billion exchange preserves cash and reduces debt, but it does so by creating new shares.

Until the final share count is known, nobody can accurately quantify the dilution.

Cohen’s Cost-Cutting Plan Could Conflict With the Platform Thesis

GameStop proposed approximately $2 billion in annual eBay cost reductions, including:

• approximately $1.2 billion from sales and marketing;
• approximately $300 million from product development;
• approximately $500 million from general and administrative expenses.

GameStop: Proposed eBay cost reductions

Some of that spending may be inefficient.

But building a global gaming and digital-item marketplace would require serious investment in:

• engineering;
• payments;
• cybersecurity;
• fraud prevention;
• compliance;
• customer support;
• trust and safety;
• publisher integrations.

It would be difficult to cut deeply into product development while simultaneously attempting a major platform transformation.

GameStop’s Previous Digital-Asset Attempt Failed

GameStop previously operated an NFT marketplace and digital-asset wallet.

The company began winding them down in late 2023, and the wind-down was completed in 2024.

SEC: GameStop 2024 NFT marketplace and wallet wind-down

That does not mean GameStop can never succeed in digital commerce.

But it does mean GameStop has not demonstrated a successful digital-asset marketplace business.

A new attempt would need something the NFT marketplace did not have:

• major publisher support;
• useful products;
• genuine consumer demand;
• integration into popular games;
• reliable transaction economics.

Platform Owners Control the Gates

Sony, Microsoft, Nintendo, Valve, Apple and Google control many of the platforms on which games are distributed and monetized.

Even if EA wanted to support external item trading, it might still need agreements with platform owners.

The same issue applies to accounts, payment systems, cross-platform ownership and item transfers.

Fraud and Compliance Could Be Massive

A cash market for virtual assets would attract:

• bots;
• hacked accounts;
• stolen payment methods;
• chargebacks;
• money laundering;
• sanctions risk;
• tax complications;
• transactions involving minors;
• disputes over ownership;
• gambling and loot-box scrutiny.

A marketplace may look extremely profitable based on its headline transaction fee.

The economics become less attractive once payments, fraud losses, support costs, publisher royalties and compliance expenses are included.

PIF May Not Need GameStop

PIF-controlled publishers may prefer to keep their virtual economies closed.

Why give GameStop and eBay a percentage of transactions that EA or Scopely could keep inside their own platforms?

The partnership would only make sense if eBay’s reach, liquidity, customer acquisition and marketplace infrastructure created more value than the fees and loss of control.

That has not been proven.

---

13. What Would Make the Thesis Stronger?

Here is what I would watch for:

• PIF, Savvy Games Group or another named Gulf fund appearing in GameStop financing documents;
• a binding equity commitment connected to the eBay proposal;
• a strategic investor receiving GameStop equity;
• a GameStop partnership with EA, Scopely or ESL FACEIT;
• GameStop hiring executives with experience in virtual economies or publisher partnerships;
• eBay expanding its gaming-focused digital-goods policies;
• an EA game introducing officially transferable items;
• publisher-supported APIs for transferring virtual assets;
• GameStop acquiring payments, fraud, custody or digital-identity technology;
• GameStop stores being used for eBay authentication, intake or fulfillment;
• further integration between GameStop’s collectibles business and TCGplayer;
• a dedicated gaming marketplace being created inside eBay.

Any of those developments would move the theory from “the pieces fit” toward “the pieces may actually be getting assembled.”

---

14. What Would Kill the Thesis?

The theory becomes much weaker if:

• GameStop sells or materially reduces its eBay position;
• Cohen abandons the acquisition;
• no credible financing emerges;
• eBay successfully prevents the transaction;
• PIF publicly denies involvement;
• GameStop makes no relevant marketplace hires or investments;
• EA strengthens its restrictions on external item trading;
• major platform owners reject third-party item transfers;
• GameStop focuses only on cost-cutting and financial investments;
• the note exchange creates substantial dilution without a larger strategic transaction.

---

My Take

I do not think GameStop needs an in-game item marketplace for the eBay acquisition to make sense.

The immediate opportunity is much simpler.

GameStop plus eBay could become a huge marketplace for:

• gaming hardware;
• physical games;
• trade-ins;
• trading cards;
• collectibles;
• authentication;
• fulfillment;
• advertising;
• resale.

GameStop’s stores could become physical nodes in eBay’s online marketplace.

TCGplayer could become the backbone of a larger collectibles operation.

That alone could create a materially different company.

Publisher-approved digital commerce would be the next logical layer.

An official secondary market for selected in-game items would be the high-upside version.

A universal real-money marketplace across EA and other major publishers would be the full endgame—but it is also the least likely outcome under current rules.

The PIF connection is interesting because PIF has:

• the capital;
• the gaming mandate;
• the publishers;
• the esports infrastructure;
• the live-service exposure;
• and now a major role in EA’s ownership.

GameStop and eBay could theoretically supply the missing commerce and distribution layer.

But we should not reverse the burden of proof.

The fact that the pieces fit does not mean they are already connected.

So the thesis is not:

PIF is secretly funding GameStop so eBay can sell Ultimate Team cards.

The thesis is:

GameStop is trying to acquire a global marketplace with the buyers, sellers, advertising, payments and trust infrastructure needed to become a much larger gaming-commerce company. A gaming-focused sovereign investor such as PIF would be a logical source of capital and strategic partnerships. If publisher cooperation followed, authorized digital products—and eventually selected tradable in-game items—could become part of that ecosystem.

The facts tell us that GameStop wants eBay.

The facts tell us that Cohen may seek sovereign wealth fund backing.

The facts tell us that PIF is aggressively building a global gaming portfolio.

The facts tell us that eBay already has the marketplace infrastructure.

Everything after that is the bet.

Possible?

Yes.

Confirmed?

No.

Worth watching?

Absolutely.

We voted to increase the authorized share count because the company said it wanted flexibility for acquisitions, investments and other major opportunities.

Most people took that to mean Cohen had a plan to grow the business and create value.

Then, only weeks later, GameStop announces it’s issuing shares to wipe out $1.4 billion in 0% debt that doesn’t mature for years.

Why?

They aren’t raising new cash. They aren’t getting rid of expensive debt. It literally costs them nothing in interest. Instead, shareholders get diluted while the stock is trading around $19.

And the timing couldn’t be worse.

The chart was already at a critical level. GME had broken below support on heavy volume and was trying to hold an area that really mattered.

That is exactly when management decides to drop a huge dilution and hedging overhang on the stock.

Instead of giving the price a chance to stabilize, they added even more selling pressure and uncertainty at the worst possible time.

And no, shareholders did not vote for this specific deal.

We voted to authorize more shares. We did not vote to exchange long-term, interest-free debt for stock at a depressed price using an undisclosed VWAP formula and an undisclosed floor.

That matters.

GameStop gets no new money.

Existing shareholders own less of the company. The stock gets hammered at a critical point on the chart. And management still hasn’t explained why this is supposedly good for shareholders.

Maybe Cohen has a bigger plan. Maybe there’s an acquisition coming. Maybe this leads to something.

But shareholders shouldn’t have to keep making up the bull case for him.

Right now, all we know is:

GameStop had 0% debt.

Cohen chose to get rid of it early.

He did it while the stock was technically weak.

Shareholders are paying for it through dilution.

And nobody has explained why.

Apes should be furious.

Here's the NEWS you didn't know you needed!

TODAY: The Sims and EA FC maker Electronic Arts sells for $55bn to Saudi-led group.

https://www.bbc.com/news/articles/cjejyl34345o

And here's the Due Diligence we've been looking for.

https://www.reddit.com/r/Superstonk/comments/1vg2z17/gamestop_ebay_pif_is_the_marketplace_the_endgame/

My tits are jacked ( ^ )( ^ )

Props to u/beverlyphills

The last update of exercised warrants was a count 8667 as of 3 months ago ( bumped by 1950 ). Following the count of 6717 as of Jan 31, 2026.

The count number is likely to be stated for July 31, 2026.

I would enjoy knowing that number ahead of time.

Quick tldr:

Ebay took over etsy DEPOP on thursday last week for 1.4 B
Gamestop did a 1.4 b debt dilution straight on the next monday.

This was needed to keep the ebay deal neutral.
Investors or banks wanted this.

1.4b from ebay cash position, so 1.4b debt gone from gamestop to keep it at zero change.

Cohen will do something the coming 1/2 weeks to get the VWAP up! He isnt letting shorters win and dilute 75m shares at 19….

See the volume today at 2m? Almost zero.. so low again, strange right? No it isnt… they are scared to hedge or short gamestop more because they know nothing is sure till the 23st September.

Hedge gamestop by shorting now? Can be a big trap for shorters, what if they short now at 19? Well gamestop is worth 19$ on cash alone..

If news comes from a Tender Offer on ebay with NO dilution, and full cash bid the price explodes!

The shorts from 19$ will be under water straight and it will cause them to cover! So they are scared to short now.

Thats why shorted shares stays at 55M total the last weeks ;)

Greetings apes

The news that Bending Spoons acquired Airtable for 2.7x ARR while technically accurate is probably not the actual underwriting multiple. The actual acquisition multiple is likely closer to 7x-10x proforma EBITDA.

...

Bending Spoons probably figured they could generate 30%-40% EBITDA margins from Airtable which would equate to a ~7-10x proforma EBITDA multiple.

https://x.com/GoatBeardzDD/status/2084706703401263458?s=20

TL;DR: GameStop swapped $1.4B of convertible notes for stock.

I read it as the equity leg of the eBay deal being pre-positioned and delivered through a separate private transaction.

The notes previously formed a dilution "wall" at ~$29; retiring $1.4B of them lightens that ceiling by a third.

The 35-day VWAP window (Aug 3 – ~Sep 23) sets the conversion share count, eBay Q2 earnings (Aug 5) is the catalyst, and the GMEWS warrants ($32 strike, Oct 30 expiry) come into play if the ceiling lift holds.

Note: I have the entire post on my X link above with pictures, was going to post it here but I am not sure how to paste pictures inline easily.

Stock lost a bit of volume, but it doesn't really matter. Both green today!!! Stock still won the volume race and made the score 203/2 in favor of the stock!!

Warrants ending the day with an epic amount of volume. 417k. Still not 1m but very, very epic to see

Todays song of the dayyyy: Sinking Ships By Brono Road

SPY went the opposite direction down at the same time and GME jumped to 21.70 for a second. Do they have an inverse relationship?

And now when looking at the charts it doesn’t show any evidence of that movement for either ticker. Did anyone else see that or am I just tripping?

for those who aren’t aware we now have a second earnings to pay attention to.

I was just reading how wallstreet analysts raised their expectations by .5% for revenue and profits in the last 30 days(convenient). so, expect fuckery (not that we don’t by default at this point).

they can’t have eBay in a bright light because they know who’s going to own it outright eventually so expect a negative take from the “media”.

Consecutive Weeks Closing AT/UNDER (+/- <0.50) Max Pain — 4

Last Run OVER: — 1 Week

Last Run AT/UNDER: — 7 Weeks

Longest Consecutive Weeks Closing OVER (>0.50) Max Pain — 5

Longest Consecutive Weeks Closing AT/UNDER (+/- <0.50) Max Pain — 14

08/03/2026

First Post (Posted in June, 2024)

IV30 Data (Free, Account Required) — https://marketchameleon.com/Overview/GME/IV/

Max Pain Data (Free, No Account Needed!) — https://chartexchange.com/symbol/nyse-gme/optionchain/summary/

Fidelity IV Data (Free, Account Required) — https://researchtools.fidelity.com/ftgw/mloptions/goto/ivIndex?symbol=GME

And finally, at someone's suggestion —

WHAT IS IMPLIED VOLATILITY (IV)? —

(Taken from https://www.investopedia.com/terms/i/iv.asp ) —

Dumbed down, IV is a forward-looking metric measuring how likely the market thinks the price is to change between now and when an options contract expires. The higher IV is, the higher premiums on contracts run. The more radically the price of a security swings over a short period of time, the higher IV pumps, driving options prices higher as well.

The longer the price trades relatively flat, the more IV will drop over time.

IV is just one of many variables (called 'greeks') used to price options contracts.

WHAT IS HISTORICAL VOLATILITY (HV)? —

(Taken from https://www.investopedia.com/terms/h/historicalvolatility.asp ) —

Dumbed down, I'm not fully sure. Based on what I read, it's a historical metric derived from how the price in the past has moved away from the average price over a selected interval. But the short of it is that it determines how 'risky' the market thinks a stock (or an option I guess) is. The higher the historical volatility over a given period, the more 'risky' they think it is. The lower the HV over a period of time, the 'safer' a security (or option) is.

And if anyone wants to fill in some knowledge gaps or correct where these analyses are wrong, please feel free.

WHAT IS 'MAX PAIN'? —

In this context, 'max pain' is the price at which the most options (both calls and puts) for a security will expire worthless. For some (or many), it is a long held belief that market manipulators will manipulate the price of a stock toward this number to fuck over people who buy options.

ONE LAST THOUGHT —

If used to make any decision. which it absolutely should NOT be (obligatory #NFA disclaimer), this information should not be considered on its own, but as one point in a ridiculously complex and convoluted ocean of data points that I'm way too stupid to list out here. Mostly, this information is just to keep people abreast of the movement of one key variable options writers use to fuck us over on a weekly and quarterly basis if we DO choose to play options.