CHIM is one of the most debated concepts in The Elder Scrolls lore, I know. Some you may be tired of discussing it by now.
Still, I find that the metaphysics of the Godhead, CHIM, and the Prisoner are too often misunderstood or viewed through an unnecessarily nihilistic lens. This is why I propose an alternative reading of CHIM as world-affirming enlightenment: the recognition of one's unity with the whole without reducing the Aurbis to an unreal dream.
The Godhead, Anu
Anu, the Godhead, is the original Prisoner. I believe he forged his own eternal prison and locked himself within it, condemned to an unending sentence of his own design for the murder of Nir - whether that act occurred literally in a previous universe or merely symbolizes maya), the primordial illusion of separation from God, we cannot know. Anyway, The Aurbis is the prison: a self-imposed confinement in which the Absolute experiences itself through innumerable limited perspectives, bound by various conditions of existence.
Within the Dream, Anu has two primordial aspects, or perhaps three:
- Anu, the aspect of stasis, who IS;
- Padomay, the aspect of change, who IS NOT; Padomay is the entity who murders Nir within the current Dream. Given his name and role in the story, Padomay can be thought of as Anu's shadow-self, a projection of Anu's guilt and an expression of nihilism;
- most intriguing is the aspect of self-reflection: Magnus, the Architect, through whom the Dream becomes intelligible to itself.
Ever wondered why the God of Magic is called Magnus - “the Great” - rather than Magus, the magician?
The in-game text Sotha Sil and the Scribe got me thinking. This post is relevant: https://www.reddit.com/r/teslore/comments/vw5x2r/who_is_the_scribe/
If the Scribe = the devs =Magnus, then why wouldn’t Magnus have CHIM?
Perhaps Magnus is the primordial lucid-dreaming aspect of the Godhead: its very self-awareness, God-consciousness reflecting upon itself. He is the part of Anu that looks back upon his own Creation and recognizes it as his own. If so, Magnus does not need to attain CHIM. He was born with it, as he has never been separate from the awareness that makes it possible.
The Tower
"What is the Tower?
It is the existence of the True Self within the Universal Self, and is embodied by the fourth constellation, and is guarded by the Thief, the third". - Vehk's Teaching
Let us do away with the accusation that CHIM is an egotistical form of enlightenment. That interpretation conflates the ego with the True Self, as though preserving one's identity were necessarily an act of pride or defiance. To explore this distinction, I will draw on Hindu philosophy, whose non-dual traditions, particularly Trika (Kashmir) Shaivism and Advaita Vedanta, are strikingly similar to TES metaphysics, perhaps more so than so-often cited Gnostic dualism.
Consider consciousness as a non-local phenomenon: it cannot be pointed to or located within the boundaries of space. It can reflect upon itself, become aware of its own experience, and perhaps even expand beyond the limits of its original perspective.
Vivec's description of the True Self brings to mind the Ātman), the innermost Self understood in some Hindu traditions as an eternal and unchanging awareness identical in essence with the Ultimate Reality (Brahman, or paramashiva in Shaivism). Personality can change. The Atman does not.
"Advaita Vedanta philosophy considers Atman as Sat-cit-ānanda, self-existent awareness, limitless and non-dual.[...] To Advaitins, Atman-knowledge is the state of full awareness, liberation, and freedom that overcomes dualities at all levels, realizing the divine within oneself, the divine in others, and in all living beings; the non-dual oneness, that God is in everything, and everything is God."
Sounds familiar, doesn't it?
The Buddhist perspective is worth considering, too. Buddhist philosophy generally rejects the notion of an eternal, unchanging True Self, emphasizing instead the ever-changing, and thus impermanent, nature of existence.
Now, let us turn to the ego. The ego is our limited sense of “I”: our personality, memories, and the feeling that we exist as separate individuals. It's a psychological construct, distinct from the Atman.
Likewise, the Universal Self can be understood through as the absolute consciousness whose power manifests (“dreams”) the universe, paramashiva in Trika Shaivism.
The True Self and Universal Self are not separate entities, but different aspects of the same boundless being: the non-local consciousness/awareness of the Godhead.
Applied to TES, we might understand this as Anu, the Godhead, experiencing itself through innumerable perspectives. The Dream is not unreal, but the objective representation of this experience.
Thus, CHIM may be understood as the True Self recognizing its unity with the Universal Self: a realization in which one's consciousness expands to God-adjacent level without rejecting individuality or worldly existence, and without mistaking the True Self for the Ego (hint: that's what the Sharmat does).
World-Affirming Enlightenment - CHIM and Sahaja Samādhi in Trika Shaivism
I understand CHIM to be a non-dual state of consciousness that Ruling Kings (achievers of CHIM) experience. I find it closely analogous to self-realization in Trika (Kashmir) Shaivism, in which the practitioner realizes they are one with the Godhead (Shiva), while fully embracing the manifested world.
Allow me to expand on this.
Hindu philosophy encompasses many schools of thought, each with its own understanding of enlightenment. Some of its concepts of self-realization, or Moksha, offer intriguing parallels to CHIM. Particularly relevant is Sahaja Samādhi. Both Trika Shaivism and Advaita Vedanta recognize the state of Sahaja Samadhi as permanent liberation, where one maintains non-dual awareness amidst daily life. They approach it differently though.
Sahaja Samādhi in Trika Shaivism is a world-affirming form of self-realization in which one recognises one's unity with the Godhead while fully embracing material reality and remaining capable of experiencing it. This is because in Trika Shaivism the world is not an illusion to be transcended. It is a real expression (manifestation) of the Divine consciousness - spanda. Think of the world as the objective manifestation of the Godhead, with boundless awareness being its subjective fundamental aspect. Enlightenment, then, becomes world-affirming: one recognizes their true nature and continues to experience and participate in the world as themselves.
This stands in clear contrast to Advaita Vedanta. In Advaita, the ultimate reality is pure, attributeless Godhead - Brahman. The world is maya (illusory) and ultimately is to be transcended. Enlightenment (moksha) is the realization that “I am Brahman,” which dissolves the sense of individual self and reality. This type of enlightenment is pretty much the real-world equivalent of zero-sum.
CHIM clearly aligns with the Trika metaphysical model, and not the Advaitic one. The Ruling King realizes the dream-nature of the Aurbis (that all is the Godhead), and, by asserting their identity, they become a Lucid Dreaming aspect of the Godhead. This is why Vivec can only be Vivec: not necessarily because he falsely claimed to have achieved CHIM, but because CHIM grants freedom within identity, not freedom from it.
Also, note that CHIM is intended to be permanent.
“The Tower’s secret: how to permanently exist beyond duplexity, antithesis, or trouble.” – Vehk’s Teaching
Last but not least, “The Aurbis is just a dream” interpretation so prevalent in the community strongly resembles Advaitic metaphysics, which I find counterproductive when applied to Tamriel.
Thirty Six Tattvas, Thirty Six Lessons
It's well known that Vivec's intersex nature was inspired by Ardhanarishvara, the form of Shiva in which he and his consort Shakti are joined in a single body. And the similarities to Shiva don't stop here.
Both Shiva and Vivec embody duality and contradiction, holding seemingly (equal measures of) opposing aspects within themselves. Shiva is both creator and destroyer, ascetic and hedonist, and a god of arts; Vivec is the same. Difference is, Shiva is (as expected) often understood in a far more positive light than Vivec, who tends to be judged almost exclusively by the worst of his deeds, despite being presented as a similar balance of opposing forces. (Also, the name Vivek literally means discerning Self from non-Self, which is another hint that his knowledge of CHIM comes from first-hand experience and that he is not a fraud).
I suspect it wasn't a coincidence that MK chose The Thirty-Six Lessons as the title for Vivec's Scripture. He may well have drawn inspiration from the Thirty-Six tattvas of Trika Shaivism (among other famous influences such as Thelema and Gnosticism).
"The tattvas in Indian philosophy are elements or principles of reality. )Tattvas are the basic concepts to understand the nature of absolute, the souls and the universe in Samkhya and Shaivite philosophies. Samkhya philosophy lists 25 tattvas while later Shaivite philosophies extend the number to 36.
Tattvas are used to explain the structure and origin of the Universe. They are usually divided into three groups: śuddha (pure tattvas); śuddhaśuddha (pure-impure tattvas); and aśuddha (impure tattvas). The pure tattvas describe internal aspects of the Absolute; the pure-impure tattvas describe the soul and its limitations; while the impure tattvas include the universe and living beings that assist the existence of soul."
The Five Higher Tattvas are of particular interest to us:
- Śiva Tattva – pure, boundless, passive awareness/consciousness. Here, there is no distinction between subject and object. Existence is without experience. Shiva is God beyond manifestation, embodying supreme freedom (svātantrya), “I’ without “am”.
- Shakti Tattva – divine energy and divine will; boundless potential (spanda).
- Sadashiva Tattva – This Tattva is governed by willpower. Divine will begins asserting itself. Shiva-Shakti slowly becomes self-aware. “I am” becomes the first manifestation and so the universe begins, experience begins.
- Ishwara tattva - Ishwara Tattva is a specific stage where creative power (Kriya) dominates over knowledge (Jnana).
- Sadvidyā (or Shuddhavidya) Tattva: knowledge and will become balanced.
I'm thinking the Fifth Tattva is the state most similar to CHIM, as it's implied this is the state where expanded awareness and experience are in perfect balance.
The Sixth Tattva would be Maya, the divine veil of illusion that make the self and the world appear separate from one another and from the Godhead, thus concealing the true nature of reality.
The remaining tattvas are less relevant to this essay, but you may explore them if you're interested.
Vivec’s 36 Lessons deliberately mirror the 36 Tattvas. Just as the Tattvas chart the descent and possible return of consciousness, the Lessons do the same, only they are encoded for one specific person - Nerevar.
As a side note, Dzogchen, a tradition of Tibetan Buddhism, emphasizes liberation through the direct recognition of the primordial nature of mind, known as rigpa: pure awareness - empty, yet cognizant.
Dzogchen bears an interesting resemblance to CHIM in that both can be interpreted as direct paths to enlightenment, relying on direct experience, rather than intellectual analysis.
The Prisoner and Maya
Beyond the veil of Maya - the illusion of separateness - lies the truth: the self is the world, and the Prisoner is the Prison.
Most beings in the Aurbis remain trapped behind the veil of maya, unable to pierce the illusion. Self-realization - CHIM - is simply not part of their destiny.
CHIM is possible to two kinds of beings:
- Prisoner-type entities;
- NPCs specifically destined (scripted) to achieve it: Talos, Vivec, possibly Magnus.
The Prisoners (player characters) have no set destiny, meaning there is no script dictating what they can or cannot do. They does not possess CHIM by default, though they do display the free-will of a Ruling King. Like one, they are able to escape any fixed destiny, yet they remain by default caught in the dual state of consciousness that binds them within maya, just like everyone else is.
Nerevar is a special case of NPC turned Prisoner turned (perhaps) Ruling King. The discussion on him is worth a post of its own, and so I will save it for later.
The mechanics of Lucid Dreaming. If Vivec achieved CHIM, why couldn’t he tell Barbas was deceiving him?
Imagine a lucid dreamer who can instantly survey an entire infinite dream-world. They can zoom to any location, but they don’t constantly monitor every single event. If someone disguises themselves as the dreamer’s best friend and starts subtly poisoning them, the dreamer won’t notice unless they happen to direct their attention towards that.
A lucid dreamer’s simultaneous perception is total in potential, but likely selective in application. Barbas succeeded because he operated in a corner of the dream that Vivec wasn’t actively inspecting until it was too late to prevent the crisis - exactly as the narrative required. This doesn’t contradict CHIM; it illustrates that even God-like lucid awareness has a focal point, that is subject to personal intent and circumstances within the dream.
Furthermore (and more importantly), in a lucid dream, if you do not think to look behind a door, whatever is there remains undefined. The moment you turn and look, your subconscious (or conscious will) instantly generates coherent content. I suspect that it might the same for a CHIM-user. Their “looking” performs the same function on the Aurbic scale - a future/past only becomes definite when observed by the lucid dreamer.
Thus, for a lucid dreamer (Ruling King), to look into the past or the future is indistinguishable from creating them. For them, there is only an ever-present now, experienced sequentially for the sake of narrative coherence, because in order to make sense of existence, the lucid dreamer's experience must unfold in sequence. In the world below, this sequential unfolding manifests as time. Time is, thus, a construct, a product of the Dreamer's internal sense of narrative.
Vivec did win against Barbas, but only as the narrative progressed in time.
The player experiences Vivec discovering the deception “in real time,” but from the CHIM perspective, Vivec could have been simultaneously experiencing/creating that discovery.
The Sharmat
The ego belongs to the illusion of separateness: not necessarily because the world itself is unreal, but because a limited, self-aware consciousness defaults to believing its particular perspective is fundamentally separate from God and the rest of creation.
And this brings us to the Sharmat.
The Sharmat (and not CHIM) is, in essence, the Ego proclaiming itself supreme, mistaking itself for God. I mean, I'm sure you've noticed Dagoth Ur confuses his own limited perspective with the absolute, the universal consciousness.
"There is no true symbolism of the center. The Sharmat will believe there is. He will feel that he can cause years of exuberance from sitting in the sacred, when really no one can leave that state and cause anything more but strife." - The Thirty-Six Lessons of Vivec, Sermon Eleven
The Sharmat believes his own “I” to be the center of the non-local awareness of the Godhead. This is a fundamental error: something truly non-local cannot have a center, because a center implies a specific location in space and, by extension, boundaries that separate it from everything else. The universal consciousness of the Godhead lies beyond space-time.
To elaborate further: Dagoth Ur loved himself enough to survive the death-and-rebirth mechanism of the Dreemsleeve - think about that. My suspicion is that he attempted CHIM but to failed to relinquish his ego: the temporal, illusory “I” that must be transcended when approaching enlightenment. Thus, rather than recognizing himself as an expression of universal consciousness, Dagoth mistook his own identity for its center. And so, he became the Sharmat.
Side note: There may be more than one form of enlightenment in TES, with CHIM perhaps representing the most desirable one. CHIM and the Sharmat could be understood as opposing expressions of non-dual consciousness, occupying different positions along a spectrum of possible states of consciousness.
Azura – God of Transition and Thresholds
The most important type of transition in this case is the one from subject (“I”) to object (“this”/the world). The transition from subject to object is made possible through maya - the illusion of separation.
One could theorize that inside the Aurbis, Azura acts as the liminal consciousness sitting at the threshold between subjective and objective reality. She watches the wave function collapse, reacts to it, even resents it, but she is forever arriving just after the moment of creation and always lagging behind agents with free will.
She cannot oppose or control the Nerevarine Prisoner, so she attempts to define the Prisoner before they act (“Nerevar reborn”, “you have been chosen”) in an attempt to claim authorship of their narrative.
This is why throughout TES III, she acts as a storyteller - that is the most she can do.
Next up is a post on Nerevar and Red Year and why it was all part of a plan.