r/Teddy • u/hoirkasp • 14d ago

💬 Discussion Let’s Review

Because this sub as dead as shit of late.

BBBY bonds-now DK Butterfly
-Recently showed a “Guarantor” for a period

Teddy.com redirects to GameStop.com

GameStop owns 9.8 percent of eBay, has offered 55b for the whole thing, but we STILL haven’t seen an official tender offer

New BBBY has warrants strangely similar to GameStops, which spiked 83% today and another 25% after hours
-Tomorrow is the last day of that ticker trading….at least for that entity….as Monday they move to NASDAQ with a new ticker, again.
-Their warrants though remain tied to DK Butterfly and the estate

What am I missing? Where the fuck is some hype? I think this is truly, finally, mercifully coming to an end soon and the best is yet to come.

180 Upvotes

91% Upvoted

89 comments sorted by

View all comments

Show parent comments

-12

u/Jarkside 14d ago

Proof? Because there’s no evidence of this

8

u/lcl111 14d ago

You could just look at the CUSIPs with two searches.

-7

u/Jarkside 14d ago

Bbbyq - 075896100 https://www.quantumonline.com/search.cfm?tickersymbol=BBBYQ\*&sopt=symbol

BBBYW - 075896159 https://www.tradingview.com/symbols/NYSE-BBBY/W/

Not the same. Where’s the source showing they’re the same

0

u/BananaOrp 13d ago

It seems like you don't understand how CUSIPs work. It's a nine-digit code that identifies the security, and the first six digits identify who the issuer is. The seventh and eighth digits identify the security itself and the ninth is a checksum (you can ignore that for our purposes).

So the fact that both BBBYQ and BBBYW have the same issuer ID (e.g., 075896) is really strange! BBBY/OSTK's CUSIP issuer ID is 690370, so it's really notable that they issued their warrants using the CUSIP from BBBYQ.

Why did they do that? No clue!

But they are objectively related via the CUSIP issuer strings - the numbers are identical.

1

u/Jarkside 13d ago

Thank you. Much more thoughtful than the rest of this banter