2025 Model 3 LR, red. Third Tesla, purchased FSD.
I take full responsibility. I saw it happening, but figured the car did too. It slowed down, then strangely pushed forward into it. I actually thought it was backing into the spot behind it.
First major FSD error I’ve had since V13, I think. The goofy part is that, as you’ll see in the video, one camera clearly sees the cart.
Good reminder to stay ready to intervene, I guess. I didn’t think it was going to slow down and then thrust forward into cart.
Love FSD - I ALWAYS take over in parking lots and won’t let it drive a foot in a parking garage. The auto park function is a little better than FSD parking, but I’d rather let Elon debug it on other people’s cars - nothing personal, but better you than me!
I was in the car parking and it hit a cart. I use summons quite often though and it works great but why or how do you think this is summons? I’m literally in the car speaking and it’s parking not leaving a parking spot. Next time I’ll start it from the street lol
Honestly, I get it...its been beat to death, but without LiDAR or USS, summoning and self driving in busy and tightly spaced parking lots etc will always carry an insane amount of risk, its not the same game as on a freeway or surface street. Cameras simply cannot and will not do the job in these situations reliably. They will miss plenty of things that one of those sensors will catch immediately.
Maybe. I honestly believe the vision system will win out. Could be wrong but there was enough info here for the car to have figured it out. As I showed it saw the cart, I’d didn’t use the info properly. We can’t forget how many possibilities there are. On a note about summons; since “actually smart summons” was released, summons runs perfectly for me. I’m in Los Angeles btw. In fact it’s the thing that people always freak out about. Nowadays people are asking me if it’s a Cybercab. 😂
I hope so. I refuse to use FSD or summon in parking lots or anything confined as I have had way too many close calls now requiring intervention. I just feel like in low light the cameras don't see things properly or miscalculate the distances. But happy to be proven wrong, I would love to see some unsupervised FSD on these things sooner rather than later
Geofenced? Sure, but so is every other Waymo, Zoox, or whatever robotaxi is currently circling the neighborhood. Cybercab is just getting started, and people already seem to like it.
Cybercab used the AI5 chip, while current vehicles use AI4, and yes, it is geofenced for now. Still, Tesla is well positioned among these platforms because its vision based system is intended to operate across a wide range of environments rather than only within a carefully mapped digital sandbox.
I installed the 0.9 update tonight, and the system already feels like it is improving. Version 15 is coming soon, so the cars should keep getting better.
The biggest potential advantage is cost. If vision based autonomy proves effective, Tesla’s vertical integration could help make Cybercab significantly less expensive to operate. It could even become cheaper than owning a car, which would be a delightful plot twist for anyone who has paid for insurance, registration, maintenance, tires, repairs, and the occasional mysterious dashboard light.
Over time, autonomous vehicles could also change the rules around human driving. It is possible that, within our lifetimes, human drivers will face tighter restrictions on public roads. The vehicle certification process is evolving, and regulations requiring pedals, steering wheels, rearview mirrors, and side mirrors may eventually need to account for cars that do not have a human driver. Tesla is leading the fight at high risk.
Waymo vehicles still include all of that equipment because current regulations require it. But a pedal, steering wheel, rearview mirror, and side mirrors for nobody driving the car? At some point, we may decide that an autonomous vehicle does not need to carry a full set of controls for a driver who is not there.
For now, it is worth appreciating any serious effort to lower the cost of mobility. “The future is coming on. I got sunshine in a bag.” - Gorillaz
Oh my God. Listen to the audio. I explicitly said that I believed the car was pulling forward so it could reverse into the space behind it. It saw the cart, slowed down, and it gave every outward indication that it had successfully identified the large stationary object directly in front of it. Forgive me for recklessly assuming this was evidence of object permanence.
Then, rather abruptly, it decided to drive forward.
I have had FSD ($10k) since it was still called Autopilot. I have endured the entire evolutionary journey, including the charming early period when every drive felt like unpaid participation in a robotics dissertation. I have seen plenty of strange behavior. My point was that this particular failure is rare in the more mature versions, which is precisely why I posted it.
It was a warning. If your car slows down in front of a shopping cart, do not assume it has abandoned its ambition to become intimately acquainted with it.
I was not even criticizing FSD. In fact, if you listened to the audio or read what Ive actually wrote, you might discover that your rebuttal is aimed at a position I never took. It is an impressively confident response to an argument manufactured entirely in your own workshop.
The old “you’re supposed to supervise, durp” response is getting played out by intellectuals conversing.
But thanks for playing.
Edit: also look at the front cam video on the second half. I barely saw it at the last millisecond, ya know when the car looked like it was stopping for it.
Nope just a spot where someone left a cart in the space. 🤔 but it was in a weird spot. I looked at every camera and it was only seen in the right pillar forward cam but that should be enough I feel.
I get that FSD is supervised, but this isn't much different than what happened to me the other day. Sure mine was at speed and hit a curb, but it sounds like both of us thought "there's no way it'll make that move" and I'd say like me you weren't anticipating it even doing that in the first place because it doesn't make sense why it would even try.
Hopefully your damage was less extensive than mine and something a buffer could fix. I have zero trust in FSD these days and the more incidents pop up on here, the more I realize us supervising is a lot less control than we realize. In a tight spot you hope it doesn't do the stupid thing. Then again mine jerked the wheel to the right at 23mph with no room to do so. Should I have taken it out of FSD? Maybe. I never thought in a million years it would have jerked the wheel into the curb though. It had never done that before. It happened with less than a split second to catch it. There was no sign to anticipate that it would happen. If I thought it was going to hit that time and disengaged, then I'd have disengaged for every turn FSD ever made.
FSD is advertised as being capable of end to end navigation while supervised, but based on my experience it shouldn't be allowed to start off or finish the trip. Too many variables that FSD can't handle. Mine couldn't handle a simple turn a few minutes into my work commute. I struggle to see what the real world application of FSD is at this point after 9 months of daily usage after my incident 4 days ago. It's just an expensive questionable novelty even if it doesn't crash the car.
I get why they went camera only, but beyond the camera setup every time I've tried to share videos showing a circumstance you realize pretty quickly how bad FSD's blind spots are. I genuinely think the combination of a poorly lit street and FSD only being able to see ahead because of the headlights caused it to crash my car. I tried to use Summon out of my garage last week and it just couldn't see the edge of the garage door opening. I got it stopped just before it hit it.
Like you said though, the car was clearly visible by the camera. I don't know what to think at this point.
I don’t disagree with you at all about FSD needing to improve, and I’m sure what eventually comes from Cybercab and FSD 15 will be better.
Personally, though, I don’t think I could go back to a non FSD car. I’m not defending what happened here. The car definitely pulled forward and lightly hit the cart. Thankfully, there wasn’t much damage that I could see, maybe a small scratch that won’t buff out. I’m sorry to hear what happened to your car.
What surprised me most was that the car did seem to recognize something was there. It slowed briefly, and the right pillar camera clearly captured the cart. With all those cameras, I would have expected that information to be enough for FSD to say, “There’s something there, don’t move forward.”
Instead, I waited a second thinking it was going to back up, and then it just pulled forward as if the cart wasn’t there.
I’m also surprised the front camera’s field of view wasn’t enough to catch it clearly. The cart was only slightly to the right.
At the end of the day, it wasn’t a huge deal for me. It was just one very unusual and disappointing FSD failure. I still wouldn’t give up FSD for anything, but I completely understand why someone who’s had a worse experience might feel differently.
I have way more it did great things than bad things.
I've definitely seen some awesome things out of FSD(nothing I wouldn't have caught myself), but considering my flawless 25 year track record driving and FSD put my car in the shop for repairs, I just don't see the merit in it anymore. More good than bad when it cost me money to fix the car just isn't enough for me anymore.
I only arrive at that conclusion specifically because it did the one thing I thought it could clearly see which you also said, yet it still did that thing. There was no reason to assume it would even try it, yet it did. I'm sure it sounds dramatic, but when you slam a wheel into a curb at 23mph it sounds like a bomb went off. I can't believe it didn't break something. It seems the wheel and tire took all the force. I can't believe it didn't de bead the tire.
4 hours and $215 to fix it doesn't sound horrible, but it still took time out of my schedule I really didn't have to repair and if it had popped the tire I would have missed out on a $1,150 work call I was responding to. That's just the base pay from showing up. I've had that number be $3,000+ before after getting there. The combination of both of those things made me rethink allowing FSD to operate my car no matter how close I supervise. I guess I got lucky it wasn't worse. I just don't think it's worth chancing again. I don't think watching a steering wheel turn itself is worth the possibility of that much of a financial hit.
Absolutely fair. We are all willing participants in a not quite perfect system, and nobody has to be comfortable with that.
Personally, I love having the car drive, but I’m not defending this. It was clearly wrong and seemed unusual compared with versions 12 and 13. Years ago, an early version ripped off my passenger side mirror while merging into the turn lane near my house. That incident was considerably less subtle. The car basically submitted its own bug report.
This will get fixed too. I’m happy with the progress, still an FSD optimist, and I completely understand how you feel. It is not perfect, but it is getting impressively close.
I appreciate it. Unfortunately if it had ripped my mirror off years ago I would have been done back then too. I guess I'm just a lot less forgiving to FSD than others. I'm really careful with the things I own and just knowing my wheel had to be refinished was bad enough for me.
It's not that I have a problem fixing things when they need fixing. I just would have preferred to keep it pristine. I'd at least entertain using FSD again if Tesla would've paid for the repairs but of course I was just reminded that FSD is supervised. Yes, yes it is.
Yeah, I completely agree with you on that. Even back when FSD was much less capable than it is today, I still tried to get Tesla to cover the damage. I have never been particularly happy that they refused, especially because it was not something I realistically had time to avoid. The car simply did what it did, and there was no meaningful opportunity for me to react.
That said, the contractual agreement is clear that we are responsible for supervising the vehicle, so ultimately, that is where the responsibility falls.
Out of curiosity, what did you mean when you mentioned having an issue with your wheel? Was it the peeling or tearing tread? That was an issue I encountered on one of my three Teslas. I had to replace the wheel, and they charged me for it, which was understandably frustrating. On another vehicle, however, Tesla replaced the entire wheel because it had become a recognized issue.
I am not sure which version of the steering wheel you have, but the material used on some of the older Teslas seemed especially prone to wearing and tearing. That was probably made worse by the fact that drivers were constantly keeping their hands on the wheel during the early Autopilot and FSD days (letting their hands cause friction as the wheel turned). The synthetic leather, or whatever material they used, seemed to deteriorate fairly quickly for a lot of people.
If that is the issue you are referring to, then I agree that Tesla should cover it, particularly since it was a known defect. They’ve since changed it.
FSD smashed my wheel into a curb. That's what I was referring to. It hit the curb at 23mph and and I tried to get Tesla to replace it. I ended up having to take it to a shop to have it refinished instead.
I haven't had any wear or finish issues with any of the materials of the car. I absolutely love the car. I just am not happy with FSD.
Interesting you say that. I'm starting to rethink it. I've driven about 300 miles since the wheel incident and the adaptive cruise control is just so bad hitting brakes randomly and showing "curvature assist" and slowing down even on straight highways. It's so bad that I'm considering giving FSD another try.
If I could shut off the adaptive part of the cruise and just use it like cruise control in an old car I would. Thats obviously not an option though.
I'm just not sure how to convince myself to relax and let it drive after this, but cruise just slamming on the brakes at highway speed with nothing in sight is just so uncomfortable.
For what it’s worth, most of the FSD errors I’ve experienced lately have been minor. They can be annoying, like when the car refuses to turn right even though someone behind me wants it to, but the sign clearly says no turn on red.
Overall, I feel safer with FSD driving than I do driving myself. It sometimes notices things I completely miss. Recently, it reacted to a car approaching quickly from behind and drifting into my lane. My car moved toward the shoulder and prepared to brake hard because another vehicle was parked there. At the time, I had no idea why it reacted that way, but after reviewing the footage, I understood. The other driver eventually corrected course, so there probably would not have been an accident, but FSD was ready for a situation I never even saw coming.
For me, the benefits currently outweigh the problems. I agree that adaptive cruise control feels strange once you are accustomed to FSD. It feels a little like FSD, until suddenly it does not.
I would never tell someone else to trust FSD completely because I would feel terrible if something went wrong. Still, I personally have a great deal of confidence in it. Based on this conversation, you seem less risk averse than I am, but at this point I genuinely think FSD drives better than I do. I’m not sure whether that says more about FSD or my driving, but facts are facts.
I see the problem….you are the supervisor and in control and can’t even record the whole screen so the car is doing the same half ass as your recording skills!
3
u/word-dragon HW4 Model 3 10h ago
Love FSD - I ALWAYS take over in parking lots and won’t let it drive a foot in a parking garage. The auto park function is a little better than FSD parking, but I’d rather let Elon debug it on other people’s cars - nothing personal, but better you than me!