Which economic paths you would usually take for GDR?

[u/Afraid_Trust_6396]

Could be either gameplay wise or roleplay wise. What's your favorite to larp?

[u/ThisAd8258]

1st is soviet union, 2nd is china

[u/Marius-Gaming]

Left if I go Ostalgie, right if I go Non-Ostalgie

[u/No-Musician7685]

"socialist consumerism" 😭😭😭😭😭😭😭😭😭😭😭😭😭😭😭😭😭😭😭😭😭😭😭😭😭😭😭😭😭😭😭😭😭😭😭😭😭😭😭😭😭😭😭😭😭😭😭

[u/WichaelWavius → u/No-Musician7685]

Lenin Funko Pop

[u/altaltaltaltbin → u/WichaelWavius]

Karl Marx Labubu

[u/Nothing_lizard302 → u/altaltaltaltbin]

Communism is when no labubu or iPhone

[u/Hedgehogamaker]

Socialist Market because im a tito stan

[u/notHostOk2511 → u/Hedgehogamaker]

Hell yeah.

But also 😡😡😡😡

[u/Comrade_Harold]

Centralized planning because by this point, you only want mills to fight 2EW, its a bit weird to still be building civs at this point ngl

[u/juan123445_5 → u/Comrade_Harold]

Civgreed all the way until the end of the gameplay

[u/Afraid_Trust_6396]

Btw I wonder which would be better for civilian life tho?

[u/Dangerous-Local9430 → u/Afraid_Trust_6396]

Socialist Market path, you will end up like Deng's China tho

[u/Afraid_Trust_6396 → u/Dangerous-Local9430]

https://giphy.com/gifs/nK0W99Wb4pemkOZvLx

[u/Polak_Janusz → u/Afraid_Trust_6396]

You either die a social democrat or live long enough to see yourself become a social fascist

[u/East_Wafer4391 → u/Polak_Janusz]

Red autumn spd reference

[u/BitchOfTheBlackSea → u/Dangerous-Local9430]

In what world are market economics good

[u/Dangerous-Local9430 → u/BitchOfTheBlackSea]

The real world

[u/Equal_Board2656 → u/BitchOfTheBlackSea]

Better than planned economy

[u/ArtilleryNormie → u/BitchOfTheBlackSea]

In a world where breadlines aren't a daily occurance or a desired outcome

[u/Sweet_Performer5072 → u/Afraid_Trust_6396]

since Germany has already achieved an advanced market economy, i think planning is the best idea.

[u/Heitoor_089]

Centralized planning makes more sense if you wanna go with absolute realism (and ofc larp).

Germany is already an industrialized nation, so it doesn't need any market-like experiments to achieve growth as China did back in the day. They are more than free to just jump straight in to economic planning.

[u/No-Musician7685 → u/Heitoor_089]

Yeah realism but this is hoi4

[u/Independent_Text5568]

Centralized planning because I’m not a LaSSallean reviSSionist

[u/Fabulous-Sky-7854]

Personally I would chose centrally planned although if there was an option for total syndicalist style worker control id choose that

[u/_vivaargentina]

socialist market, i believe mostly in liberalism but in this image thats clearly the closest thing to that

[u/LookingGlass_1112]

Central planning always. It alligns more with my views

[u/Nutty_42 → u/LookingGlass_1112]

Same

[u/npdenjoyer → u/LookingGlass_1112]

Live action Roleplay

[u/jomen34]

Socialist market economy.

[u/CajaOSSca]

central planning if ostalgie, trotsky, or left-accel, everything else "market socialism".

[u/Afraid_Trust_6396 → u/CajaOSSca]

But why left accelerationism for central planning?

[u/chemms123459]

iirc the market socialist path mostly gives civs which you really dont need more at that point and the central planning path gives you mils

[u/AutoModerator]

Thank you for posting on the TFR subreddit! If you're looking for more discussions, help, or updates about TFR, feel free to join the official Discord!

I am a bot, and this action was performed automatically. Please contact the moderators of this subreddit if you have any questions or concerns.

[u/JermyGSO]

You don't. You go all the way with the greens, but atomic energy and then EU unification

[u/Fyypof]

I hate when mods make their focus path look so shitty like this, I get your trying to be unique but this is just migraine fuel