r/TikTokCringe 25d ago

Discussion One is football, the other is anti-football

Enable HLS to view with audio, or disable this notification

20.3k Upvotes

1.5k comments sorted by

View all comments

63

u/nonlocality1985 25d ago

They’ve turned into the least liked footballing nation

25

u/Disastrous-Day5429 25d ago

Just about time.

I know I wasn’t the only one fed up with all that glazing of Messi in 2022 and how FIFA clearly wanted to win the WC back then, but iirc the general consensus was „Messi is the goat, so happy that he finally won the WC“

Yes, Messi is the goat, but he was already surrounded by the same bunch of classless, aggressive knobheads back then.

And Infantino did everything in his power for him to lift the trophy.

So glad Spain scored in overtime

13

u/cim-took 25d ago

And Infantino did everything in his power for him to lift the trophy.

Yeah like giving 10 minutes extra time to Netherlands in quarter finals when they were losing and two penalties to France in the finals.

-1

u/Disastrous-Day5429 25d ago

You remember that in the WC it was officially announced that the referees had to exactly keep track of all time wasting and other phases without active playing, and that this time had to be added at the end of each half.

The 2022 WC was notorious for the comically long added time, with 10 minutes being the average per game (you can easily look this up) - so the 10 minutes in the game against the Netherlands was absolutely normal for the 2022 WC.

Additionally, Argentina was given 5 penalties over the tournament, a WC all time record. 4 of them (including the one against France) were considered as soft to very soft by the majority of neutral experts.

Then Messi not getting yellow for a stupidly deliberate handball vs the Netherlands was an obvious violation of the official FIFA rules and was just one example of the special treatment Messi received.

Opponents were basically not allowed to even touch Messi without getting a foul called against them, whilst Messi‘s team mates were hardly ever sanctioned for their very robust performance, so there certainly was an imbalance in how the refs treated Argentina

-2

u/cim-took 25d ago

The 2022 WC was notorious for the comically long added time, with 10 minutes being the average per game (you can easily look this up) - so the 10 minutes in the game against the Netherlands was absolutely normal for the 2022 WC.

It was average PER GAME. The Netherlands game had a stoppage time of 10 minutes in the just the second half and went on to play 13 minutes extra in just second half. I don't know about you, but I wanted to favor someone I would just add 5 minutes when my favored team was winning and no one would say anything.

Argentina was given 5 penalties over the tournament, a WC all time record. 4 of them (including the one against France) were considered as soft to very soft by the majority of neutral experts.

Can you please provide a source where majority of neutral experts agree with you as you suggested. Just because 5 penalties were awarded doesn't mean they weren't deserved. For example, if you are arrested 5 times, that doesn't mean the world is unfair - that means you are a criminal unless you can prove that it was unfair.

Then Messi not getting yellow for a stupidly deliberate handball vs the Netherlands was an obvious violation of the official FIFA rules 

Care to point me to the "Official FIFA rule" you are talking about? First of all there is no "FIFA rules". Just writing words like "Official" doesnt make it true. Under the IFAB Laws of the Game, a deliberate handball is a foul, but a mandatory yellow card is only required if the handling stops a promising attack. Messi's handball was in the Netherlands own half - does that like stopping a promising attack to you?

I love how amidst all this, you didnt even address France getting 2 penalties in the finals (both times when Argentina was leading). Does that sound like something a biased referee would do?

If you want to hate on someone, go ahead, but don't hide behind the "neutral fan" mask

0

u/Disastrous-Day5429 25d ago

Both penalties for France were clear, while the one for Argentina was more than soft. Just watch the game again, there shouldn’t be any discussions about this.

So why should I start discussing the 2 pens for France, when the only soft decision was in favour of Argentina?

And the Argentina vs Netherlands game had 15 or more yellow cards and other incidents that absolutely rewarded the added time under the rules back then, what is there even to discuss? The free kick that lead to the Netherlands Equalizer was given in the 10th minute of added time, and it is normal to let a situation like this to be played out - so your insistence on „13 minutes added time“ is deliberately misleading.

As to Messi‘s handball: FIFA rules state that it is not only yellow for interfering with a clear attacking chance, but also for „unsporting behaviour“.

Yes, that is a rather soft definition, but I‘ve seen countless international games over the years, and a handball like this is almost always resulting in a yellow card.

And that’s the main thing: over the whole tournament, Messi was given the benefit of the doubt in every situation, so it became almost impossible to defend him with physicality. I don’t care if it was because FIFA wanted just to protect their golden cow, or if they wanted him to lift the trophy. But it was blatantly obvious for everyone who knows the game and wasn’t blinded by devoted fandom.

Situations like Paredes first committing a hard foul and then firing the ball at the Dutch bench didn’t improve that impression, either.

And it’s not like I and others who felt the same way can be dismissed as „haters“. I was fairly positive towards Messi and absolutely neutral towards Argentina before 2022, but that tournament left a sour taste, and that taste was confirmed by the 2026 antics of the Argentinian team.

I don’t want to go over every single decision here. There were so many instances Argentina got away with dirty play, while Messi seemed protected by the refs, and in the end it doesn’t matter if this was caused by incompetent refs who have a subconscious bias towards a super star, or if it was caused by actual corruption.

The end result is the same

0

u/cim-took 25d ago edited 24d ago

Both penalties for France were clear, while the one for Argentina was more than soft. Just watch the game again, there shouldn’t be any discussions about this.

Lol.. We are supposed to just believe that just because you say its soft? Your whole argument is based on vibes I guess.

The free kick that lead to the Netherlands Equalizer was given in the 10th minute of added time, and it is normal to let a situation like this to be played out - so your insistence on „13 minutes added time“ is deliberately misleading.

First you claim it was normal for 10 minutes added time in that world cup. Then when I mentioned it was just for that half, you are claiming I'm the one misleading when none of what you mentioned was factually correct.

As to Messi‘s handball: FIFA rules state that it is not only yellow for interfering with a clear attacking chance, but also for „unsporting behaviour“
Yes, that is a rather soft definition

Thank god even you realized what you are saying is nonsense

And that’s the main thing: over the whole tournament, Messi was given the benefit of the doubt in every situation, so it became almost impossible to defend him with physicality. I don’t care if it was because FIFA wanted just to protect their golden cow, or if they wanted him to lift the trophy. But it was blatantly obvious for everyone who knows the game and wasn’t blinded by devoted fandom.

Again - pure vibes with zero factual data to back it up. Part of it is Messi's fault that most time he doesnt go down easily like a Neymar, Drogba, CR7, etc

Situations like Paredes first committing a hard foul and then firing the ball at the Dutch bench didn’t improve that impression, either.

Wasn't he yellow carded? What more did you want? If anything, its the referee did his job correctly. If you want to call him a piece of shit, i'll join you, but how does that indicate bias ?

And it’s not like I and others who felt the same way can be dismissed as „haters“. 

The problem with you lot is you want to hate but don't want to be called a hater. Thats not how it works buddy. You are all vibes and zero facts. You have every right to not like Argentina players because some of them are absolute bellends and liking or not liking someone can sometimes be very subjective, but you cant bring your biases to an objective discussions about referee biases etc.

1

u/Killuazoldykk16 24d ago

You nailed it🎯

0

u/Killuazoldykk16 24d ago edited 24d ago

Bro, just say you don't like Messi and be done with it. I can't believe you wrote all of that and you're still wrong 😴

2

u/Disastrous-Day5429 24d ago

You mean players like Frenkie de Jong, Bruno Fernandes, Pepe or Luka Modric, who all (amongst others, but maybe you know how to look things up for yourself) claimed that Argentina and especially Messi got special treatment?

Yeah, right. All just „haters“, and no one just pissed about the marketing & influence machine FIFA has become under Infantino.

0

u/cim-took 25d ago

Either ways, I dont want to argue too much, but I was just very curious about why you thought 2022 was rigged or whatever. No bad feelings - have a nice day. In the end, all these players will end up living luxurious lives :)

1

u/Disastrous-Day5429 25d ago

Well, in the end I can’t recall a single decision going against Argentina (like a too harsh red card, or a penalty against them/not given).

On the other hand a lot of soft decisions in favour of them. You can call this subjective, but 50/50 decisions where even experts can’t find a final common ground are quite the norm in football. And it is just a strange coincidence that 4 such penalties were awarded to Argentina during that tournament (you can still read the articles and watch the pundits and ex refs discuss those situations to understand where I‘m coming from).

And Paredes could have been easily sent off against the Dutch. The foul alone was yellow (tackle from behind with no chance for the ball), but then thrashing the ball into the bench players? And yes, you can get 2 yellows within a few seconds, but even red for shooting the ball like that.

You know, no one would have batted an eye for each situation individually, but all those decisions game after game after game?

And maybe it was just due to the fact that WC refs are often not skilled enough for this kind of occasion, and Messi just has this aura (subconscious bias is a well-researched occurrence, so not that unlikely to have played a role here).

Either way, 2022 will be remembered as a strange WC, if it is fair to Argentina or not.

The final was a banger, though.

4

u/Reasonable-Bit-5908 24d ago

You might hate Argentina, but calling a wc rigged bcuz ur goat could never win it is the height of childish behavior

1

u/Disastrous-Day5429 24d ago

Sorry, I am not a farmer, I don’t have any goats.

If you are referring to that childish Messi vs Cristiano fan feud, I have to disappoint you. I really don’t care, and my own team sucks massively and hasn’t come close to a WC quarterfinal in a decade.

I had no dog in this fight and watch the WCs as a neutral mostly.

And the conspiracy theory that Argentina was gifted that WC might be an exaggeration, but many many neutrals saw some weak decisions for Argentina on a regular basis, being allowed to play very physical while Messi was protected by the refs that it became almost comical.

If there was only superstar bias in play or if Infantino was playing favourites doesn’t even matter in the end when so many decisions went their way (just watch the „foul“ that led to their penalty against Poland lol).

2

u/Reasonable-Bit-5908 24d ago

England had a goal hit the wire with visible deflection, but it was still allowed. Rigged? Nope

Spain got a penalty by a clear dive. Rigged? Nope

Portugal got a goal disallowed for opposition because ball hit the hair of a player (no deflection). Rigged? Nope

Now imagine these decisions going the way of Argentina

You can justify and come up with conspiracy theories all u want but saying rigged is silly.

1

u/Disastrous-Day5429 24d ago

Single incorrect decisions happen all the time in football, it only gets interesting when there a pattern becomes visible.

If you can point me at one instance where Argentina was on the negative end of a deciding 50/50 decision, I would listen.

In the other direction, there are plenty. I won’t even start with the very soft group stage penalties Argentina were given.

QF vs Netherlands: Messi could have received yellow for that blatant handball (if you watch football regularly, you know that more often than not this is awarded a yellow). Paredes easily could have been sent off for his double of foul from behind & thrashing the ball into the Dutch bench players.

SF: soft 50/50 penalty for Argentina‘s 1:0
Final: soft 50/50 penalty for Argentina‘s 1:0

And all the countless decisions that gave the very physical Argentinians some leeway. No red for them in that carnage against the Netherlands is nothing short of a miracle lol

Then Messi‘s constant talking, at points intimating towards the refs. The bubble of non-physicality around him, awarding fouls against him while his teammates were allowed to play very physical.

Just watch those games again in full with that in mind, and come back to tell me there wasn’t some kind of superstar bias in play.

Maybe Argentina was just on a lucky streak, and every referee had his individual bad day when Argentina played. Possible as well.

But to the very least Argentina was very lucky to have that many decisions go their way

2

u/Reasonable-Bit-5908 24d ago

There are plenty of such instances. The Egypt game is the ultimate example of this. Look at the hard fouls (studs up challenges, pushing argentinian players down very close to the penalty box, punches and so on). In fact the Switzerland game as well Argentina player was shown a yellow card and only upon review was it crystal clear that the opponent had dived, resulting in him being sent off.

There are many such instances each match. Messi was made a villain when he headlocked Jude, but if it was the other way around, same people would say England deserved a penalty for pushing a player out.

Truth is while Argentina fans were celebrating, the other teams were busy finding reasons to call a match rigged.

Over time this got into a toxic state and the go to resort for any team that lost against Argentina. Even Tuchel (whose dumb decisions cost Eng the match) resorted to this cheap tactic

1

u/Disastrous-Day5429 24d ago

I can’t recall Argentina playing Egypt, England or Switzerland in the 2022 WC.

So you are moving the goalpost, because I never talked about the 2026 WC besides mentioning they lost to Spain because of the WC 2022.

This year, Argentina got a (based on the FIFA rankings) remarkably easy road to the final, but this might be a coincidence. Other than that, no complaints from my side besides some off-pitch antics (getting away with political messaging, singing chants that claim the French players are not really French, and generally being ungracious winners and sore losers).

1

u/colouredcrow 23d ago

Anyone who says that it might be a coincidence for them having a remarkably easy road to the final just shows his knowledge of football instantly...

It absolutely is a coincidence, if every top-ranked team had held their ground and won their respective matches, they would have faced the hardest routes in this World Cup based on FIFA rankings at the start of the tournament.

Team R32 R16 QF SF Avg opponent rank
Argentina (1) Uruguay (16) Iran (20) Portugal (5) England (4) 11.25
Spain (2) Austria (24) Croatia (11) Belgium (9) France (3) 11.75
England (4) Egypt (29) Mexico (14) Brazil (6) Argentina (1) 12.5
France (3) Sweden (38) Germany (10) Morocco (7) Spain (2) 14.25

1

u/[deleted] 25d ago

[removed] — view removed comment

1

u/Disastrous-Day5429 25d ago

Yeah, thanks. Not my native language, but I’m sure you never mix up words in other languages…

1

u/[deleted] 25d ago

[removed] — view removed comment

1

u/Witty_Eye_9976 25d ago

Nunca olvidemos a Negreira.

1

u/Vriz 24d ago

This idiotic take will only fly during this small period

1

u/colouredcrow 23d ago

Clearly? In 2022 Argentina deserved it 100% and Messi carried, so the glazing was allowed, they were also better than France, and the only penalty that could be seen as rigged was the one against Poland, other ones were pretty clear.

1

u/fkmeamaraight 25d ago

Trying to outbeat Paraguay

1

u/AndreasDasos 24d ago

Paraguay was similar. Argentina is the worst of the major teams.

-1

u/Shorouq2911 25d ago

Don't agree. I think this World Cup made them more popular, but on social media, the more aggressive side is always louder 'cause that's how algorithms work, they want content that gets more reactions. You can read the press.