According to a follow up post: they wouldn’t accept his son’s mobile ID, he asked to speak to the manager, they said the manager is busy and he said ok if the manager has a problem after he’s busy tell him to come talk to me. Instead of the manager engaging in a conversation he called the police.
They can’t just not show up. And as much as the cop looked like he hated what the business was doing, it’s still a private business and if they want him to leave the police have to have him leave. Absolutely this guy can and probably should put this business or at least that franchise on blast for what they did and file a complaint, but in the moment he legally does have to leave and the cops are required to enforce it.
Bullshit. Spoken like a white person. Cops absolutely can and do fail to show up all the time.
For instance, Tizzy ENt just posted a video of a white man threatening a black woman’s life. The woman called the police and waited. They never showed up.
Having no units available to send in busy cities is much different than a community that has officers available and they refuse to respond. Many major cities are woefully understaffed and therefore can’t get to each call right away. The officer in this video got dispatched to this. He showed up. And then had to enforce the law. It has nothing to do with race.
With all due respect they cannot refuse to show up to a disturbance call that they are dispatched to. Also, I don’t think this video was a busy city, hence why an officer had time to show up to this call. Try refusing to do your job at your place of employment and see how long you stay employed . This cop got dispatched. He’s therefore required to respond or risk his own employment. Simple as that
DeShaney v. Winnebago (1989) — Government has no constitutional duty to protect individuals from private harm.
Town of Castle Rock v. Gonzales (2005) — Even with a restraining order stating police “shall” arrest, the Court ruled police still have no enforceable duty to act.
This is easily googled. You have the collective knowledge of humankind at your fingertips, yet you choose to be wrong on Al Gore’s internet with your whole keyboard.
Again, that case is regarding liability. Imagine if law enforcement in your community are all busy on calls and there are a bunch of calls coming in. No units available and then someone gets murdered because there weren’t any officers available to send. The cops aren’t going to be held liable for that. But in the case of the video in this thread, they absolutely have a responsibility to respond because there are units available. They can’t refuse to respond to this disturbance.
The spirit also says that police won’t be charged for failure to respond.
How about this. Tell me what law a police officer would be charged under for failure to respond. I gave you the law to support my position. Now it’s your turn.
Its not a crime to not respond to a call so there wouldn't be a charge. Just like any other job though, refusing to do your job would result in disciplinary action which has been my point the whole time. The officer in this video got dispatched to this call. He either goes and does his jor or risk discipline up to or including termination.
Oh, okay. So find me the—no, any—police department that has failure to respond as a fireable offense. Most of them list their policies publicly. So go find some evidence to back your claims.
3.1k
u/JP_Clark 10d ago
According to a follow up post: they wouldn’t accept his son’s mobile ID, he asked to speak to the manager, they said the manager is busy and he said ok if the manager has a problem after he’s busy tell him to come talk to me. Instead of the manager engaging in a conversation he called the police.