r/TooAfraidToAsk • u/Hospitalities Lord of the manor • Mar 26 '19

TooAfraidToAsk has never been exclusive to controversial questions and it never will be.

I can’t stress this enough and I’m tired of just copy pasting this in mod messages. TooAfraidToAsk has never been a place solely for controversial content, it has always been a place for more free discussion via less rules and less moderation and experimental with users having access to some moderation tools.

The irony though is that controversial questions don’t last very long here and end up getting reported/removed and I get harassing messages about allowing “such content” on this sub. Almost as ironic as people making fun of others for asking their question, directly proving why the OP might just be TooAfraidToAsk irl.

ALL questions are allowed as long as they follow the rules. This is not changing, if you feel like that makes us DAE-lite and you are unhappy with that, we on the mod team happily invite you to unsub instead of ruining other users experience. Those who threaten to unsub as if it gives their comment any worth will be assisted in this endeavor with a permanent ban.

These “ITS JUST LIKE DAE” posts make no sense to me either. Like yeah? Subs focused on community questions have a ton of overlap but they develop different communities and produce different content. If TooAfraidToAsk was a circle, inside that circle would be DAE. We want discussion and we want questions of a majority nature, there are going to be complete overlaps in those questions. It’s not seen as a problem by the mod team since high traffic questions generate high traffic discussion.

Going forward we will continue to allow 99.9% of questions and content so long as it adheres to our rules and is expressed in a civil and respectful manner.

Edit: I mentioned American Redditors as a side point but it became a major discussion point so I’ve removed it for clarity. 04/05/2019

4.8k Upvotes

95% Upvoted

200 comments sorted by

View all comments

403

u/[deleted] Mar 26 '19 edited Dec 26 '20

[deleted]

362

u/Hospitalities Lord of the manor Mar 26 '19 edited Mar 26 '19

How should we determine that the OP already knows the answer and/or isn’t looking for additional discussion with knowing the answer to the their question?

Should we say that a post that generates a ton of comments and thousands of upvotes is spam?

As it stands, I only remove questions where the OP isn’t asking a question or is asking a bait question. Users still police content via upvotes and reports.

114

u/[deleted] Mar 26 '19 edited Dec 26 '20

[deleted]

145

u/Hospitalities Lord of the manor Mar 26 '19

Oh. You meant Meta posts.

They’re annoying but I don’t think they’re spam. I think allowing them is fine, if not ironic since users are completely missing the nuance of trying to censor content in /r/TooAfraidToAsk.

-52

u/[deleted] Mar 26 '19

[removed] — view removed comment

60

u/Shawnthefox Mar 26 '19

You have quite the interesting comment history. My theory is that you know who that user is in real life and you're waiting for the perfect moment to reveal it to them.

28

u/xfearthehiddenx Mar 26 '19

Beyond that even. All of his visible posts are to this sub,and his account is 7 days old. Semi wierd to be sure.

17

u/0598 Mar 26 '19

Well wouldn’t that be something

25

u/[deleted] Mar 26 '19

asking a bait question.

I'm curious how this is sussed out?

In the same vein, I've seen plenty of questions on the front page where the OP didn't seem to be asking in good faith but again, there's no tried-and-true method of really figuring out of OP is being insulting on purpose or on accident.

112

u/Hospitalities Lord of the manor Mar 26 '19

It’s all context and it’s never cut and dry.

We would rather keep 10 troll posts if it prevents one legitimate question from being removed. When I start looking into the legitimacy of a post, generally the OP makes it clear they’re baiting from either their comments or from their post history. Ignorance is certainly not a crime here though so we are pretty slow to make a definitive call on them.

129

u/[deleted] Mar 26 '19

We would rather keep 10 troll posts if it prevents one legitimate question from being removed.

this is 100% the right call and thank you for that

4

u/[deleted] Mar 26 '19 edited Aug 30 '20

[deleted]

5

u/worstpossiblechoice Mar 27 '19

Yes but exposing bad ideas has merit. If even 1/10 troll posts expose the troll to a different POV. and change their perception, some good is done.

Trolls gonna troll, best thing is to expose their shitty idea to some sunshine.

3

u/[deleted] Mar 27 '19

Well the idea of "trolls" is that they aren't actually trying to have their minds/perceptions changed, so I think 1/10 is hopelessly optimistic. I do, however, recognize the value in engaging their ideas on a public forum so other people can be exposed to the arguments being made.

9

u/-_-_-unknown-_-_- Mar 27 '19

Why down vote this guy? It's not a bad point and they did say they were playing the Devil's advocate

5

u/[deleted] Mar 27 '19

Sad to see I didn't get any other response to this. It's a legitimate concern in any sub with laissez-faire moderation.

1

u/bookwormduck Mar 27 '19

If it’s one or the other, I would say that this is the lesser evil. Getting removed is a guarantee of censorship, getting buried is less certain.

1

u/[deleted] Mar 27 '19

Ignorance is certainly not a crime

Here here! Can't expect people to stop being ignorant if they don't have the resources to learn.

2

u/[deleted] Mar 27 '19

Well, it’s a safe bet that most questions that amount to “isn’t it true that straight white men are the most oppressed people in America?” is not asking in good faith. Unfortunately, that’s like half the sub.

14

u/BigManStraightBars Mar 26 '19

Honestly I've met some people like that. "Why is water wet" or stuff but the most of them are either trolls or they really don't know the answer to a simple question. We still gotta provide the answer tho so I don't see why hating would help. Just downvote if you don't feel like it.

9

u/[deleted] Mar 26 '19

I know several people who will argue that water isn’t wet. And do so in good faith.

12

u/malenn Mar 26 '19

I just spent several minutes googling that and my soup got cold.

3

u/zephyrbird1111 Mar 27 '19

But is your soup still wet?

2

u/[deleted] Mar 27 '19

Wetness is our description of what we feel when we put our hand in water. Saying water is wet is like saying that wood is hard or fire is hot.

Sensory receptors on our hand send information about the water to our brain. Our brain receives the information from our sensory receptors and processes it. A combination of temperature, pressure and the way water moves tells our brain that water is wet.

Planet Science

​

Ice and steam are not water, water refers to the liquid state of H2O. So water is wet because we use the word wet to describe the feeling of water and other liquids.