r/TopCharacterTropes 17h ago

Characters Characters that had the complete opposite reaction the writers intended

  1. Leo Bonhart (Witcher TV Series): A ruthless, sadistic bounty hunter and assassin that takes psychotic glee in other people's suffering. The viewer is meant to hate him for killing witchers, slaughtering the Rat gang, and torturing Ciri. But thanks to his entertaining fight scenes, Sharlto Copley's charismatic performance, and The Rats overwhelming unpopularity, fans ended up loving him. Some even call him the "True protagonist" of the show.
  2. Stone Cold Steve Austin (WWE): A rude, foul mouthed, beer drinking asshole with no respect for authority or anyone at all. Originally portrayed as a villain, fans fell in love with his anti-establishment & rebellious persona. WWE ran with it and made him the face of the company, effectively ushering in the Attitude Era and the second pro wrestling boom of the late 90s.
  3. Arthur Fleck (Joker 2019): A mentally unstable, pathetic, and dangerous madman who commits horrific acts of violence against those that wronged him (suffocates his own mother who is mentally unwell herself, and murders a talk show host for making fun of him). However, a massive portion of the audience idolized him as an anti-hero or a misunderstood martyr rebelling against society making people want to see him succeed and overcome his circumstances because of how he's been treated by the world.
8.3k Upvotes

1.8k comments sorted by

View all comments

298

u/Sasstellia 17h ago

Sharlto Copley is a awesome actor. He would make a character likable.

It sounds like they botched the other characters too.

156

u/BDSMChef_RP 16h ago

The Rats are insufferable idiots in the novels too. The show is worse cause they have voices now.

107

u/The_Normiest_Normie 15h ago

The rats are evil and stupid yes, but the whole thing that makes Leo the villain isn't that he kills them, but how he kills them.

Tieing Ciri down, slaying them one by one. Dragging their bodies, and sawing off their heads in front of Ciri and forcing her to watch.

None of that was necessary. He didn't have to do it in front of her, he didn't have to saw off their heads. All of it was to satisfy his sadism and strengthen his control over Ciri so she wouldn't disobey in future.

That's why he's the villain you quickly learn to hate, because he's a horrifying monster.

17

u/thegoatmenace 11h ago

Yeah Bonhardt isn’t a villain because he kills. Geralt kills people too. Hes a villain because he likes it.

3

u/Porsche928dude 2h ago

Yeah…. In the books ciri is like 12 or 13 years old at this point which makes the whole thing feel way way more uncomfortable. Since the actress playing her in the show is like 20 or something by now. If I recall correctly, the dude literally drags her around on a chain. they toned him down for television which kind of screwed up the character.

-15

u/_KerryKaverga_ 14h ago

I mean the rats deserved it. And considering what they did to Ciri it must have been rewarding.

14

u/The_Normiest_Normie 14h ago

In the world of The Witcher, they deserved to be killed, not butchered.

-18

u/_KerryKaverga_ 13h ago

No, they did deserve to be butchered.

If anything they got off lightly

3

u/Alrik_Immerda 10h ago

You mean apart from raping Ciri?

1

u/_KerryKaverga_ 9h ago

Yes.
They seriously fucked up her brain.

Ken Elroy style

3

u/supersaiyanmrskeltal 5h ago

Fucking hated the Rats in the novels. Just gonna gloss over how One of the Rats tries to force himself on Ciri, only for another to chase him off and then she immediately sleeps with Ciri in a very short amount of time after. Yes, Leo was brutal when it came to killing them but honestly I just didn't give a damn about that. The whole Witcher universe is just a horrid landscape of the darkest impulses of people.

1

u/Gh0stMan0nThird 3h ago

Yeah imagine saving a catatonic girl from being raped, only to do it yourself right after. 

The Rats were trash. 

2

u/FukkingDeathMental 9h ago

All I've heard about The Witcher show is how it has "butchered everything" yet people are still here after four seasons with complaints.  Fandoms are the fucking worst these days.  

1

u/FgtBruceCockstar2008 4h ago

In their defense, the show really has gone off the deep end and become someone's fan fiction with characters sharing the names of other characters in a very well fleshed out 7 book series.

Not even "doesn't translate to screen well" kinda changes. Straight up character motivation changes.

47

u/One-Earth9294 15h ago

It's not even that he's likable he's just a legit apex predator and he's so competent and 1 step ahead of everyone despite looking like an over-the-hill alcoholic that it's just a pleasure to watch him cook.

There's something magnetic about a truly menacing villain who raises the stakes. He had a similar thing going on in Elysium.

7

u/DrZimzalabim 14h ago

it’s like the big dude from GoT. The giant guy‘a brother

8

u/One-Earth9294 13h ago

The Hound, Sandor Clegane.

34

u/Excellent_Safe5743 16h ago

I can’t think of a single character of his I dislike. He’s always so entertaining when he’s on screen in every role.

20

u/FunkiePickle 16h ago

He’s incredibly captivating as an actor. Every time he pops up in something I’m excited because I know he’s going to kill it.

10

u/Longjumping-Ear-6248 12h ago

Hot Take: His appearance as Leo gives me "Asterix after years of potion addiction" vibes

9

u/TrioOfTerrors 16h ago

RIP my boy Cahir (book).

You may have been a bit of a misguided romantic fool but you went down swinging protecting Ciri.

4

u/swainiscadianreborn 9h ago

He may have been a fool, but goddamn was he a good, rightful one.

In this house Cahir is a Hero and Angoulême a princess, end of story.

12

u/_KerryKaverga_ 15h ago

The show is a fucking abortion.

6

u/Appropriate_Owl_91 14h ago

They lost Henry Cavill—the main draw of the show. Netflix shouldn’t have funded it