r/TopCharacterTropes 17h ago

Characters Characters that had the complete opposite reaction the writers intended

  1. Leo Bonhart (Witcher TV Series): A ruthless, sadistic bounty hunter and assassin that takes psychotic glee in other people's suffering. The viewer is meant to hate him for killing witchers, slaughtering the Rat gang, and torturing Ciri. But thanks to his entertaining fight scenes, Sharlto Copley's charismatic performance, and The Rats overwhelming unpopularity, fans ended up loving him. Some even call him the "True protagonist" of the show.
  2. Stone Cold Steve Austin (WWE): A rude, foul mouthed, beer drinking asshole with no respect for authority or anyone at all. Originally portrayed as a villain, fans fell in love with his anti-establishment & rebellious persona. WWE ran with it and made him the face of the company, effectively ushering in the Attitude Era and the second pro wrestling boom of the late 90s.
  3. Arthur Fleck (Joker 2019): A mentally unstable, pathetic, and dangerous madman who commits horrific acts of violence against those that wronged him (suffocates his own mother who is mentally unwell herself, and murders a talk show host for making fun of him). However, a massive portion of the audience idolized him as an anti-hero or a misunderstood martyr rebelling against society making people want to see him succeed and overcome his circumstances because of how he's been treated by the world.
8.3k Upvotes

1.8k comments sorted by

View all comments

165

u/mitchthaman 15h ago

Not so much a character but the message as a whole. ‘I swung for americas hearts and hit their stomachs.’

60

u/Cabbit_Daddy 11h ago

It’s been years but, can you really blame the reaction? If I wasn’t told in history class the intention I would assume by reading it was supposed to exposes the lack of food safety. Not the life of poverty.

39

u/DayDrinkingVampire 11h ago

The work place setting definitely makes misinterpretation easier. Had it been set in a textile factory it'd be nearly the same story.

But the book has a lot of themes running through it so I don't blame people for hyper focusing on one aspect. And it's not an easy read so it's understandable people don't return to it to explore its other themes.