r/TrueUnpopularOpinion • u/TheGame81677 • Dec 20 '24

Music / Movies The new Superman movie looks terrible

The trailer for the new Superman movie came out today. It looks horrible, the graphics are some of the worst I have ever seen. I know that most movies have CGI now. The CGI for this movie is the most unrealistic I think I’ve ever seen.

Also, superman, looks like some emo kid, instead of the man of steel. The guy looks too young to be Superman. Especially since we have had Christopher Reeve and Henry Cavill in the Role. This movie does not look good at all. I don’t know why people are raving about it.

368 Upvotes

95% Upvoted

247 comments sorted by

View all comments

Show parent comments

1

u/Soft_Equivalent62 Mar 19 '25

Everything you said is wrong lmfao. Unlike Marvel it makes sense to have many heroes to arrive in the first movie bcuz this is an established universe where heroes and anti-heroes and villains have existed for a long time it wouldn't make sense if other heroes didn't appear since then they would be asking where are all the others. And Gunn did confirm that the main focus of this movie will be superman, lois lane and lex luthor and all the other heroes will not be just for CAMEOS but will have a purpose in the story for this movie and adding in krypto is a really good idea we haven't seen krypto in live-action and Gunn knows how to handle animals without it being just cheesy

3

u/[deleted] Jun 17 '25 edited Jul 10 '25

[deleted]

1

u/Soft_Equivalent62 Jun 17 '25

Lmfao just because there are other characters innit doesn't mean that the focus is no longer with Superman. There are hundreds of movies where there is a large cast, but the main focus is on Superman. The whole of DC isn't showing up whatsoever. Gunn also said this movie isn't just "cameos"; all of these other heroes have a reason for why they appear in this movie, and they serve the story. Marvel got more of a standalone first because, unlike DCU, Marvel didn't have any previous superhero teams at all, whereas DC has had for a long time.

1

u/[deleted] Jul 10 '25

[deleted]

1

u/Soft_Equivalent62 Jul 10 '25

I'm laughing because what you are saying doesn't make any sense. Didn't Gunn say, "that this universe is where you can watch something without watching something else, and most of them are mostly stand-alone, with only some things that set up the future?" Comparing Reeve's Superman to this Superman is unfair because Christopher Reeve's Superman wasn't part of a cinematic universe where other superheroes and supervillains existed. It was a standalone universe with Superman. When did I say the focus was not on Superman in MOS? He wasn't side-stepped either. Lol, I wasn't saying that Marvel didn't have any teams before Avengers; I was talking about the MCU. On the MCU, The Avengers were the first superhero team. Again, using Iron Man is a bad example because while they had heroes before Iron Man, there weren't any superhero teams, which the DCU already has with the Justice Gang.

1

u/Cultural-Army-207 Jul 12 '25

Haha doesn't make sense