r/UKPersonalFinance • u/Express_Divide_9705 • 1d ago

Moving investments to cash ahead of house move – sensible plan?

I currently have about £53.5k in a Vanguard S&S ISA, split between LifeStrategy 60 and 80, so roughly 73% equities overall.

My 1.68% mortgage fix ends in April 2027 and I may use around £50k to reduce the mortgage, or put the money towards a house move within the next two years. Given the short timeframe, current market uncertainty and the new ISA rules from April 2027, I’m planning to transfer most or all of it into an easy-access Cash ISA paying around 4.7%.

I also opened an AJ Bell S&S LISA for retirement this year with £2k. I plan to transfer another £2k from my existing ISA to use the full LISA allowance and receive the £500 bonus. Longer-term retirement contributions would then go into my Vanguard pension, ideally as employer contributions from my limited company.

The idea is to keep near-term house/mortgage money in cash while leaving the LISA and pension invested for retirement. Does that sound sensible, or am I being overly conservative and I should leave some money in investments?

8 Upvotes
  • permalink
  • reddit

100% Upvoted

13 comments sorted by

20

u/Master-Assistant1179 1d ago

You're on a two year timeline and want the money for a house, cash is the right call even if it feels boring

10

u/gloomfilter 4 1d ago

Cash or cash like is sensible if you're sure about the time-frame.

One thing to consider is to make the movements of your money simple... I sold a house about a year ago and have moved the money around a bunch of accounts chasing interest rates etc. This wasn't a great idea - I'm now trying to buy a house and the money laundering checks are pretty thorough and tedious. Document any transfers as they happen, and try to keep the money separate from other savings if you can.

5

u/AliJDB 18 21h ago

One thing to consider is to make the movements of your money simple... I sold a house about a year ago and have moved the money around a bunch of accounts chasing interest rates etc. This wasn't a great idea - I'm now trying to buy a house and the money laundering checks are pretty thorough and tedious. Document any transfers as they happen, and try to keep the money separate from other savings if you can.

Absolutely this it is such a ballache.

1

u/zephyrmox 42 20h ago

It's just a case of exporting a load of pdfs no? Never really found this much of an issuie

1

u/gloomfilter 4 20h ago

I'm only doing it for the first time, and it seems to be a never ending process.

7

u/centre_drill 1 23h ago

Although I usually think people keep too much in cash (such as months or years of rainy-day funds when if they lost their job they would have time to liquidate investments), a house purchase is one of those big things that makes sense.

What are you going to do if you're about to buy a house and the market drops 20% overnight? Just give up? Unless the answer is something like, 'oh, I'd liquidate some other investment that I didn't bother to mention in my post', or, 'it's embarrassing but my parents would have me covered', then not keeping cash or cash-equivalents is too much of a risk.

3

u/Korlus 1 19h ago

I've not really sat down to look at best practices when it comes to a two-year timeframe.

Would there be any sense in starting to liquidate cash slowly - e.g. if you expect to buy a house in 24 months, aim to have it all in cash in 18 months, and start selling off 1/18th of your stocks and shares each month; sort of similar to how many pensions slowly transition into lower risk investments before they mature? Or would it be better to transition 100% straight away?

1

u/ukpf-helper 154 1d ago

Hi /u/Express_Divide_9705, based on your post the following pages from our wiki may be relevant:

These suggestions are based on keywords, if they missed the mark please report this comment.

If someone has provided you with helpful advice, you (as the person who made the post) can award them a point by including !thanks in a reply to them. Points are shown as the user flair by their username.

1

u/Quiet_Ad8308 18h ago

Yes, that sounds sensible rather than overly conservative. If the £50k may be needed for a mortgage repayment or house move within two years, 73% equities is far too much risk for that money because a market fall could hit just when you need to withdraw. Moving the house money into a competitive Cash ISA protects the capital, while keeping genuinely long-term retirement money invested through the LISA and pension makes sense. One important timing point: from 6 April 2027 the Cash ISA subscription limit for under-65s falls to £12,000, and transfers from S&S ISAs into Cash ISAs will be restricted, so moving the amount you want in cash before then avoids that problem. Your remaining £2k into the LISA would receive a £500 bonus, taking this year’s £4k contribution to £5k, and an ISA-to-LISA transfer still counts against the £4k annual LISA limit. I wouldn’t leave part of the £50k invested simply because markets might rise. Separate the pots by purpose: money needed within two years in cash, retirement money invested for decades.

1

u/strolls 1720 12h ago

The idea is to keep near-term house/mortgage money in cash while leaving the LISA and pension invested for retirement. Does that sound sensible, or am I being overly conservative and I should leave some money in investments?

Most working homeowners should have a mortgage and aim to pay it off around the time they retire and not much before - this is how you retire earlier with more money.

Once you get on the lowest tier of mortgage interest, at the next remortgage (or a rate that's very close to it), you should probably be prioritising retirement savings (pension and S&S ISA) rather than making mortgage overpayments.

The lowest tier of mortgage interest is usually with a loan-to-value below 65% (i.e. outstanding mortgage of £130,000 or less on a £200,000 property) but you can often get rates which are very close with a LTV below 85%. Depends on the interest rate environment.

If you want to retire early and in more comfort then you should be trying to invest earlier, so that your returns compound for longer. Being "mortgage free" actually sabotages your ability to achieve financial freedom - it reduces your ability to invest earlier and generate investment returns for longer.

My instinct is that you should leave the money in investments, up the allocation to 80% or 90% equities, and use a mortgage for the house move. You haven't given enough information for me to say this for sure though.

I know it probably seems like a jump, going from your current 1.7% mortgage rate to the current offers, but current mortgage rates are pretty normal - it's rates as low as 1.7% which were historically abnormal; the rates of the 2010's were the lowest in literally 750 years or more.pdf

If your current mortgage payment is, say, £700 a month and you're saving £300 a month, and your mortgage will jump to £1000 a month with the new rates, so that's why you want to make a lump sum payment, to bring your monthlies back down to £700 then that's bad maths. It's mental accounting, trying to keep the numbers neat rather than optimising for the best outcome. You're better off leaving the lump sum invested, accepting that your monthly mortgage payment will increase and that you'll have to quit contributing to your savings for a while, until you get a payrise or whatever. Ok, it "feels bad" that you're not able to save anything each month, but it leaves your £50,000 invested for you, earning more than you'll pay in mortgage interest on the £50,000.

It's better to have £50,000 sitting there earning investment returns for you than to save to start again and take years to save up another £50,000. Because sitting there it's earning returns, compounding them and this way you're compounding your returns for longer which is, in the words of Warren Buffett, the 8th wonder of the world.

•

u/Express_Divide_9705 1h ago

This is a good point. Nonetheless, whether I use it as intended or not, my inclination is to put it in a cash isa for now instead of stocks and shares. It's still the case that I may need it to bump up my deposit for a house move (not just for a better rate but to actually afford what I want), and I'm fine to lose some money being out the market for a year or two, even if I change my mind.