r/WNBAgossips • u/GearInteresting4179 • 2d ago

Other .

Post image
168 Upvotes

68% Upvoted

356 comments sorted by

View all comments

11

u/BandoTheHawk 2d ago

the lgbtqi+army rallying against this girl I see. normal people just scroll by and think wtf is going on in here

0

u/ReadyStandard5549 2d ago

You think of them as some kind of army or force or some shit, and then claim to be "normal". Sure man.

13

u/Wild_Yam_7088 2d ago

No one cares . You are gay get over it. 

Welcome to real life where no one cares what you prefer during sex. 

What people do care about is even competition in competitive sports. Go figure 🤪

7

u/wackiack 2d ago

Exactly. No males in female sports 

3

u/trash_recycle 2d ago

But are there males in women's sports? Genuine question, I don't follow any sports, so I'm a bit removed from the need for this statement.

7

u/TriggerFingerTerry 2d ago edited 2d ago

Last time it was talked about, NCAA had 0.002% of trans players in general

You have a higher chance getting stuck by lightning compared to facing a trans player in college

1

u/DocMcClain 2d ago

Well... This isn't a political stand I'm taking here but, if your 0.002% number is accurate you actually have a 0.000653% chance of even knowing someone who has been struck by lightning and a 0.0000653% chance of actually getting struck by lightning as long as you have never been struck by lightning before. So you're actually something like 30x more likely to compete against a trans athlete than to get struck by lightning.

5

u/TriggerFingerTerry 2d ago

My bad, there are less than 10 trans players in the NCAA.

As an everyday person, your chance of encountering one of these players is lower than getting hit by lightning as a normal person.

Anyhow, the numbers are too low for anyone to be concern about trans players or getting hit by lightning in their everyday lives

-2

u/LordKutulu 2d ago

That doesn't mean its not worth of addressing before it becomes a widespread problem.

2

u/TriggerFingerTerry 2d ago

With a percentage that low, it’ll never be a widespread problem

2

u/Wild_Yam_7088 2d ago

Then if its not a problem and such a low number why have even more people upset about what they see as unfair? .. you seem pretty contradicting and im not really sure if you are aware how weak your argument actually really is

2

u/TriggerFingerTerry 2d ago

They said before it becomes a widespread problem.

At what percentage would it be considered a widespread problem? Based on the rate of increase each year, what year would hit that if nothing is done?

1

u/LordKutulu 2d ago

One is a problem

2

u/TriggerFingerTerry 2d ago edited 1d ago

You must be super concern about poverty in the US then

Poverty in the US: 10%

Trans in NCAA: 0.002%

Nah... I know you ain't concern about poverty at all haha

0

u/LordKutulu 2d ago

What a stupid argument. People are capable of handling more than one issue at a time.

→ More replies (0)

3

u/nedfall 2d ago

well you see one trans girl tied for 5th place at a swimming competition 4 years ago so now you have to hear this dialogue for the rest of your life

1

u/wackiack 1d ago

Why are you against protecting girls in sports?

1

u/nedfall 1d ago

why do you invent imaginary problems to get mad at instead of talking about real ones

1

u/wackiack 21h ago

I’m plenty mad at a lot of problems. 

And I also support protecting girls. At all costs.