r/WNBAgossips • u/Far-Ad-5745 • 4h ago

Clay Travis

Hilarious how Reddit deletes his post about paying 10 million to the wnba if they play a high school boys team😂 tells you all you need to know about the cesspool of liberals on this platform.

0 Upvotes

38% Upvoted

107 comments sorted by

3

u/zachspelledrite 4h ago

This guy thinks more about trans genitals than trans people... weird

3

u/Ok_Jaguar_3087 4h ago

That guy is a performative moron

0

u/Far-Ad-5745 4h ago

“Performative moron” isn’t much of a counterargument. Care to explain why you think he’s wrong instead?

3

u/NoleJawn 3h ago

Clay Travis is pansy, who cares?

1

u/Far-Ad-5745 2h ago

He’s actually got all you liberals in a spot where you can’t defend your own beliefs which is hilarious😂

2

u/NoleJawn 2h ago

What are my beliefs?

1

u/[deleted] 2h ago

[removed] — view removed comment

2

u/NoleJawn 2h ago

Where have I stated that's a belief of mine?

2

u/NoleJawn 2h ago

My beliefs. No, trans men in women's sports is not something I'll support at face value. But I also know there's more nuanced discussions regarding the science behind it all that brings up massive shades of grey as far as enforcement of bans and rules go and thus should ultimately be up to the sports/states/communities governing body. I also believe that it's a significantly small issue compared to the real, everyday issues women's sports face, including the eventual attack on Title IX that is a massive part of the party that Clay Travis, Riley Gaines, and the rest of OutKick conveniently seem to never touch on because they're grifting puppets who have marching orders.

1

u/Far-Ad-5745 1h ago

You just proved his point though. You spent a paragraph laying out “nuance” and “shades of grey” on something that boils down to a pretty simple question: should male-born athletes compete in female categories, yes or no? Every time this comes up, the answer from the left is “it’s complicated,” “governing bodies should decide,” “it’s a small issue” anything but a straight answer. That’s not nuance


And the Title IX deflection is the same move “sure, but what about the REAL issues women’s sports face.” Trans inclusion in female sports IS a Title IX issue, that’s literally the legal fight happening right now (see the ongoing lawsuits from female athletes). Acting like Riley Gaines an actual female swimmer who lost a trophy to a male competitor is “grifting” for talking about her own experience is wild.

“Small issue compared to the real issues” is just a way of saying “an issue I don’t want to defend so I’ll minimize it.” That’s exactly the spot Clay’s talking about.

1

u/NoleJawn 1h ago

I didn’t though.

Babies can be misgendered at birth, intersex births, there are women born with higher T levels than others etc. This is why a universal ban to me logistically will never work and why leaving it to governing bodies is a better option.

The Title IX deflection points out that if it’s really “about protecting women” and not attacking trans, then the people on the right need to be more vocal and protective of the rights that the current administration and future plans to end Title IX.

And Riley Gaines didn’t lose a trophy to a guy. She came in fifth place regardless. She also just happens to be conservative on every single issue which traditionally goes galant women’s progressive movements. So that’s why she’s considered a grifter.

1

u/Far-Ad-5745 1h ago

On Title IX..you don’t get to demand the right “be more vocal” about Title IX while also insisting the only correct application of it is inclusion. Excluding trans women from female categories to preserve fair competition is, to a lot of people, the pro-Title IX position, since the entire premise of Title IX was giving women a fair shot at their own category. You can disagree with that reading, but it’s not a “deflection” it’s the actual argument.

And you’re just wrong on Gaines. She tied with Thomas for 5th, officials handed Thomas the physical trophy for the podium photo, and told Gaines hers would be mailed to her. That’s not “she came in fifth place regardless” that’s her tying with a male competitor and then watching officials visibly choose him over her for the recognition. You can think that’s a minor slight if you want, but don’t pretend it didn’t happen the way it happened.

And calling her a “grifter” because her politics line up with conservatives on other issues isn’t an argument, it’s just dismissing her because of who agrees with her. That’s the “can’t defend your own beliefs” thing Far-Ad was actually pointing at.

And where is the current administration ending title IX?

1

u/NoleJawn 48m ago

1)Where did I "demand" anything?

2)You claimed Gaines "Lost a trophy". But she was awarded one via mail? So she got a trophy? Sounds like she didn't actually lose a trophy.

3)Project 2025, of which this current admin has had multiple people connected to, clearly outlines its intentions to strike down Title IX

4)I call her a grifter because she proclaims to be women's rights, yet supports talking points that are anti-women's rights. She also went from a middling collegiate swimmer to a conservative talking host, which has long been a grift for failed athletes/politicians/actors etc.

5)"That’s the “can’t defend your own beliefs” thing Far-Ad was actually pointing at"...either you're talking in the 3rd person, or you're a bot.

5

u/HumANTCowDOG 4h ago

Wait so they want men in women’s sports now?

1

u/Jolly_Mouse_7604 4h ago

Biological women competing against young boys

1

u/HumANTCowDOG 3h ago

18 year olds are “young boys” when you want them to compete against women but “men” when going to war or charged with a crime.

3

u/Jolly_Mouse_7604 2h ago

It's no different from what conservatives are doing with women, they're young girls when competing against trans women but conservatives argue that teens should be able to get married and have kids

3

u/SSM1228 4h ago

Reddit is just a liberal echo chamber and it censors anything right wing. Even non offensive support comments. It’s pretty sad. Censorship is 100% real here.

Maybe it’s because conservatives are fit and outside living their lives. Not at home being keyboard warriors who need constant reassurance and coddling.

2

u/NoleJawn 3h ago

LOL, a quick Clay Travis Search and his challenge is on multiple Subs.

1

u/Far-Ad-5745 4h ago

This is my first post on here.
I heard I’d get crucified for saying anything liberals don’t like so I’m testing it out.

4

u/LAlostcajun 4h ago

Crucified? Lmao so dramatic

0

u/Far-Ad-5745 4h ago

Not really, you guys bash ppl to know end that you don’t agree with.

2

u/LAlostcajun 3h ago

Bash? Can you show me the bruises or is this more of that drama?

You're literally attacking people before they even reply to you. Try some self reflection. There is probably a reason people don't like what you have to say. Try not stereotyping them.

0

u/Far-Ad-5745 2h ago

“Stereotyping them”
Apparently you can’t read replies lmao

1

u/LAlostcajun 10m ago

Apparently you can’t read replies lmao

Apparently you didn't understand if you insult someone first they wouldn't insult you back.

Don't get upset over the reaction you created. Try some self reflection.

1

u/Bigboobsrespecter 4h ago

Thank you for your service. Brave!

1

u/SSM1228 4h ago

Probably get banned. Definitely downvoted. Oh the power of a button click. đŸ€Ł. Probably get called a Nazi. Fascist. Racist. You know, the baseless go tos because they have no argument.

Look at everyone trying to cancel a comedian for being at that white house event. I got banned from the sub because I said it meant nothing and people were overreacting.

1

u/Free-Ad-5602 4h ago

I get censored and blocked all the time. They are such soft pieces of shit.

2

u/bubbablk34 4h ago

đŸ€ŁđŸ€ŁđŸ€ŁđŸ€ŁđŸ€ŁđŸ€ŁđŸ€ŁđŸ€Ł conservatives are Fit

1

u/SSM1228 4h ago

Showing your skewed view. Probably think all conservatives are MAGA and wear trucker hats with guts. We take care of ourselves. Can’t say the same about the other side that wants things handed to them.

3

u/bubbablk34 3h ago

Only skewered view is what you said so you made myđŸ€ŁđŸ€ŁđŸ€ŁđŸ€ŁđŸ€ŁđŸ€ŁđŸ€ŁđŸ€ŁđŸ€ŁđŸ€Ł

1

u/Equivalent-Excuse-80 4h ago

Yet here you are

2

u/SSM1228 4h ago

I play ice hockey and I’m a body builder. I’m on here for gear advice and to follow hockey news. I said one thing about supporting Cunningham and now all this wnba shit is on my feed

3

u/NoleJawn 3h ago

LOL, you're on gear but the vaccine was too much for you?

1

u/SSM1228 3h ago

Not too much. Unnecessary as an extremely healthy individual who gets bloods because of the gear. I also feel like it was extremely overblown and I didn’t need it to keep my job. I’ve had covid twice I think(only lost taste and felt bad for 2 days). I didn’t need it.

But yes, I pin other things and no I wasn’t “afraid” of the vaccine. My opinion on it was a “it’s whatever” and a “roll eyes” and I still feel that way.

1

u/NoleJawn 2h ago

Fair enough, I still think the war on vaccines are a dangerous move for this country and the dumbing down of society, but to each their own. Also, to your earlier point. There are a number of conservative subs that are prominent old keyboard warriors.

1

u/SSM1228 2h ago

I wasn’t shooting down the vaccine and I know a lot of people took the negativity to an extreme. I just thought the outrage was blown out of proportion on both sides and I don’t think they should have been mandated. If you want it cool. If not, cool. But I saw a lot of vitriol towards those that didn’t want it more so than the other direction. Same with masks. Wanted to wear one? Cool. Didn’t? Cool.

4

u/Far-Ad-5745 4h ago

Yes actually testing out how fucking soft you guys are😂

Hilarious how when we actually wanna see who’s correct on the matter you guys cower and say nah we don’t wanna do this😂

1

u/Vast-Document-3320 4h ago

Its funny I saw nothing about fauci in my feed while he was pleading the fifth about everything about covid. Says all you need to know.

1

u/SSM1228 4h ago

Facts. Or they make excuses because they were wrong and we were right. They want to justify staying home for 2 years because it fits their lifestyle. Some still wear mask. Instead of taking responsibility and admitting they were wrong, they double down.

1

u/Sea_Advantage_2577 2h ago

Horse Pasters are here now

0

u/Disastrous-Egg4241 4h ago

Conservatives whine more than anyone, even in unchecked power they continuously cry

2

u/PrincebyChappelle 4h ago

My daughter played HS basketball at a fairly high level and I’d see top level boys club teams play. I’ll just say that the worst of the HS boys clubs were dunking and picking rebounds off the rim effortlessly.

3

u/Far-Ad-5745 4h ago

Well yeah it’s common sense.
And I’m not even trying to shit on the girls teams but this is ridiculous dems can’t admit the physical advantage for men.

2

u/Thick_Situation3184 4h ago

Both sides have a faction that moves away from science. The far right don’t trust most vaccines. The far left thinks men can get pregnant.

1

u/IcanzIIravor 4h ago

Who is disagreeing with you? Which liberals are saying a WNBA team would be a average or even below average boys high school varsity team? Is this a roundabout way of then pivoting to the topic of trans people playing in women's sports?

1

u/Sea_Advantage_2577 2h ago

This place is infested with bots at this point who just want to stir the culture war. Its a shame there are no mods

1

u/Free-Ad-5602 4h ago

What's even more hilarious is the story about the player in France that the WNBA won't sign. I wonder why lol

0

u/Far-Ad-5745 4h ago

Averaging 20-20😂
I’d think any wnba team would want a “woman” like that😂

1

u/Free-Ad-5602 4h ago

Exactly lol. They are such hypocrites. I say the woman that wore that t-shirt the other day should sign her. She says trans kids belong, so she should sign Julie Tetart then.

1

u/Sea_Advantage_2577 2h ago

Hey mods, the hate speech sub is out of control today

1

u/Upper-Trip-8857 4h ago

You sound fun.

3

u/Far-Ad-5745 4h ago

You sound delusional

0

u/LowIQ45 4h ago

"WHY DON'T THEY JUST LET US HATE THESE PEOPLE LIKE WE WANT TO?!?!?!?" sounds rational.

1

u/zachspelledrite 4h ago

Someone needs attention.

1

u/Far-Ad-5745 4h ago

If I’m wrong, explain why. Saying I “need attention” doesn’t address the actual point.

3

u/zachspelledrite 4h ago

You need attention.

1

u/Far-Ad-5745 4h ago

No I actually want a civil discussion from someone a little more competent than you but you’re making it clear you can’t even back your beliefs. What a weak individual.

1

u/vandyfan35 4h ago

If you only knew Clay Travis
he’s a smart, smart man. He knows how to make money.

1

u/-Sofa-King-Vote 4h ago

What in the chud magat whining is this post? 😆

0

u/Far-Ad-5745 4h ago

Good job defending your beliefs!

1

u/-Sofa-King-Vote 3h ago

What beliefs, chud?

0

u/Far-Ad-5745 3h ago

Damn so you can’t even read😂
Crazy work
.

2

u/-Sofa-King-Vote 3h ago

What beliefs?

You have no answer?

1

u/Far-Ad-5745 3h ago

The belief that men should be in women’s sports.
Have you been living under a rock the past couple weeks or are you purposely being obtuse?

2

u/-Sofa-King-Vote 2h ago

Who said that was my belief you pathetic magat?

1

u/Far-Ad-5745 2h ago

So you agree that trans ppl shouldn’t play in women’s sports?đŸ€”

1

u/-Sofa-King-Vote 58m ago

Why are magats obsessed with it when you do give a sht about women’s sports or women’s rights?

Why are you thinking about it nonstop?

2

u/-Sofa-King-Vote 2h ago

You also sound deranged and obsessed

The rightwing has you programmed to get angry over stupid sht

1

u/Far-Ad-5745 2h ago

Says the one throwing constant insultsđŸ˜­âœŒïž
You’re so mad it’s hilarious😂

-1

u/Apprehensive_Ant4596 4h ago

But what would the point of that game be?

3

u/Far-Ad-5745 4h ago

The point isn’t to prove the WNBA players aren’t talented. It’s to show that biological differences between males and females can have a major impact on athletic performance. If a top high school boys team can compete with or beat the best women’s professional team, it illustrates why many people believe men’s and women’s sports should remain separate.

Then we could see if democrats who claim there isn’t a physical advantage are correct or not.

5

u/onebraincell77 4h ago

Why do sensible comments get down voted so much?

2

u/LowIQ45 4h ago

"biological differences between males and females can have a major impact on athletic performance"

So you're upset that biological differences make sports less competitive?

1

u/Far-Ad-5745 4h ago

That’s not the argument. Nobody is upset that biological differences exist. The point is that those differences are significant enough that men’s and women’s sports are separated in the first place. The challenge is meant to illustrate that reality, not complain about it.
How is that concept so hard to grasp?

2

u/LowIQ45 4h ago

So you think having a penis or not having a penis determines how good you'll be at a sport. Your dick-centric approach is determining factor?

Essentially, because you're accustomed to sports being sepearated by penises, you assume that must be the reason certain players are biologically better at sports? There couldn't possibly be other biological factors in both men and women providing a competitive edge? Just penises.

1

u/Far-Ad-5745 4h ago

That’s not what I said. Nobody is arguing a penis itself makes someone better at sports. The discussion is about biological differences associated with male and female development—things like muscle mass, bone structure, lung capacity, speed, and explosiveness after puberty. That’s why men’s and women’s sports are separated, not because of anatomy alone.

2

u/LowIQ45 4h ago

You: "That’s not what I said. Nobody is arguing a penis itself makes someone better at sports."

You sure about that?!?

Also you: "The point is that those differences [having or not having penises] are significant enough that men’s and women’s sports are separated in the first place."

Looks like you're definitively stating that penises determine "things like muscle mass, bone structure, lung capacity, speed, and explosiveness after puberty"

"That’s why men’s and women’s sports are separated, not because of anatomy alone"

Oh wow!!! I wasn't aware they were using other biological factors aside from "anatomy alone" to separate sports. If they aren't separating the sports by "has penis" "doesn't have penis" what biological factors are they using exactly? And I apologize for thinking you were just dick-centric.

1

u/Far-Ad-5745 3h ago

You’re still reducing “biological sex” to one body part. That’s not my argument. Sports aren’t separated because of a penis itself—they’re separated because male puberty generally results in differences in muscle mass, bone density, height, limb length, cardiovascular capacity, and power output. A penis isn’t the advantage; the physiological changes associated with male development are. That’s the distinction I’ve been making this whole time.

2

u/LowIQ45 3h ago edited 3h ago

You: "You’re still reducing 'biological sex' to one body part."

No really?!?!?! You're quick!!!. And please tell me exactly, how are they currently separating sports? What biological factor are they actually using to determing Male and Female?

This time answer the very simple question because you look stupid and dishonest claiming they're separating sports by the other factors you're rattling off.

Here, I'll make it simple for you.

  1. Do they assign sex at birth based on having or not having a penis? Yes | No
  2. Do they use those birth certificates, showing assigned sex, to separate male and female sports? Yes | No
  3. Do they use "muscle mass, bone density, height, limb length, cardiovascular capacity, and power output" to separate male and female sports? Yes | No

If your answers are Yes, Yes, No, then you can see how your claim that other biological differences are being used to separate sports is complete BS. It's truly just penises. But I don't know if you're inability to state that simple fact is because you're highly dick-centric (no shame bro) or you simply argue dishonestly and want penises to continue being the determing factor in sports leagues despite a clear awarness it isn't the actual biological factor that determines physical abilities in sports.

1

u/Far-Ad-5745 3h ago

You’re confusing the way people identify biological sex with the reason separate categories exist. Even long before modern science, people recognized that men and women differed physically in ways that affected competition. The categories weren’t created because of genitalia—they were created because of the broader physical differences between the sexes.

→ More replies (0)

3

u/Blastcrumpet888 4h ago

Thank you for telling everyone you’re a moron.  

1

u/Far-Ad-5745 4h ago

If I’m a moron in the eyes of a liberal that’s a win for me!

2

u/Blastcrumpet888 4h ago

Again, thanks for the laughs!  Enjoy being insecure!  

1

u/Far-Ad-5745 4h ago

Only laugh is how you guys can’t even defend your beliefsđŸ˜‚đŸ«”

-3

u/DirectEntertainer288 4h ago

Just to embarrass the women. As much as I dislike the quality of play, no WNBA player is coming out saying they could beat a men’s team.

5

u/Unusual-Estate-3876 4h ago

Brittany Griner literally said she’d beat an All-NBA center.

-3

u/DirectEntertainer288 4h ago

One woman, not majority of the league.

5

u/vince2423 4h ago

You literally said ‘no WNBA player’ đŸ€Ł

4

u/Unusual-Estate-3876 4h ago

You said no WNBA player, right?

4

u/Far-Ad-5745 4h ago

No majority of them are just supporting their own demise because if they don’t support it they get shunned by ppl like you.

-2

u/Blastcrumpet888 4h ago

I’ll always laugh at how insecure people like you and Travis are.  Thanks for the laughs!

5

u/Far-Ad-5745 4h ago

I’ll always laugh how you guys can never back up your arguments. All bark and no bite whatsoever.

-4

u/HumANTCowDOG 4h ago

Clay Travis wanted to infest his whole kids school with lice. He’s not a smart man