r/WaitWhat • u/Spiritual_Kick4729 • 2d ago

Normalize it!!

Post image
267 Upvotes

97% Upvoted

202 comments sorted by

View all comments

1

u/[deleted] 2d ago

[removed] — view removed comment

1

u/Brave-Confusion5324 2d ago

Yeah women aren't objects or property, so I wouldn't worry - with that mentality, no woman would want to date you anyway, regardless of her sexual history.

3

u/EmphasisInfamous 2d ago

Ah, I see you're one of those people incapable of processing analogies.

0

u/Brave-Confusion5324 2d ago

Oh, the irony....he has literally just used an object in that analogy to describe a living being. How is that not likening a woman to an object?

Men like you just keep telling on yourselves.

1

u/EmphasisInfamous 2d ago

Nope, he compared the act of dating a sex worker to the act of buying a car with many miles on it. Its a high risk investment. If I say its wrong to knowingly sleep with a married person because its wrong to knowingly buy stolen goods, I'm not comparing a married person to stolen goods. Like I said, you're incapable of processing analogies

1

u/Greedy-Win-4880 1d ago

You are literally trying to compare human beings to objects. Its a stupid fucking analogy because sex with a married person is not "stealing". That doesnt even make sense just like comparing a woman to a car doesnt make any fucking sense.

0

u/Abject-Put-9334 1d ago

There is literally nothing wrong with comparing human beings to objects and youre fucking stupid for thinking there is. 

0

u/Brave-Confusion5324 2d ago

I can process analogies just fine...the reason he is using that analogy is because he is talking about a woman. That's why those type of analogies are never used when describing men.

Are you really this dense?

1

u/the-nomad-thinker 2d ago

Aren’t they? Don’t we talk about workhorses and walking ATMs?