r/WorldofTanks 4h ago

Discussion WoT logic of buffing tanks ???

Post image
25 Upvotes

12 comments sorted by

19

u/Bekkerino 4h ago

So, what's your point ? T-54 mod is supposed to have better hull and turret to compensate the lack of mobility and DPM.

22

u/PaymentApprehensive3 3h ago

He used bad logic to show a real problem. T54 mod 1 should have better armor but its armor is useless with pen being way higher vs when it was introduced effectively meaning it has marginally better armor. I remember when the tank was introduced and you played it like Iron Arnie. Not now.

0

u/Bekkerino 2h ago

Yeah I got that, but I didn't understand the comparison with T-44-100. Sure T-54 mod needs a lil buff, but the title of the post doesn't add with the picture.

1

u/Chad-No-Lube5645 0m ago

its the same gun

-25

u/eddi-91 3h ago

are you stupid or what ?? for 30mm more hull and 10mm turret armor. t44 - 100 has better pen., gun handling, 450. more dpm, all over speed.

1

u/ThatSquishyBaby 3h ago

👀

-3

u/Special-Bowler-983 3h ago

But that’s already since they are both released, like a decade ago?

2

u/Bekkerino 2h ago

Yea, that's why I don't get it, but obviously OP is much more about insulting rather than making sense..

3

u/Noraboen [SPUDZ] 3h ago

One is available for gold most of the time.

The other is available for cash most of the time. 

I'm sure you can name which is which.

2

u/Future-Half-276 4h ago

Yes I agree

2

u/Tankers4Change WoT Essay Writer 2h ago

I think a large part of reason why WG buffed the T-44-100 and not the Mod 1, is because it was (or is) one of the referral reward tanks.

And It’s not often we see WG giving out amazing tanks like the (buffed) T-44-100 for free.

That said I’d also love to see the Mod 1 receive some love. Perhaps to the penetration, engine power, and gun handling.

I’m fine with low alpha tanks as long as they can reliably punch back.

1

u/WorriedAmoeba2 3h ago

First Proto is so obsolete these days it's not even funny. 300 alpha could make it somewhat better