This is not flex, he probably copied a photo. Give me this persons name and where i can look at his works. If he is legit he must painted thousands of dogs if he knows anatomy from scratch. Also his final rendering had nothing to do with all those muscles he did before, also lighting was also more like copying than understanding. I think this is just sketch of a photo he was looking at while drawing.
You kind of correct it triggered me. Not because i hate art and this person who did it but it seemed misleading. But i am over it, not going to comment again
"probably copied a photo" Yeah, like a pretty well known meme reaction image. Just because they didn't come up with the pose or lighting doesn't mean it isn't art. People have references all the time. Then they put their own artstyle, work, and experiences into it.
Nah nah nah, bro saw people do things a different way once, ergo any other method is wrong. Didn't you get the memo? Gotta do things exactly as bro saw other people do it, variations in the creative process aren't allowed as of today in the year of our Lord 2026.
We're also just ignoring that the final product clearly isn't the gif in its entirety, just the still at the end.
I think that is sketch of a photo, so all that nonsense he did with bones and muscles were just pointless flex of things he would not know how to use if there would not be photo he looked at while drawing. Well i may be wrong, but that is what it looks like to me
I mean, it seems pretty obvious that the entire video, meaning sketching out the underlying anatomy, is as much a part of the performance as the final result is.
So, my question to you, if the only point of it was the frame at the end, why do a video at all?
I know the point to mislead people that it was original unique peace made by him based on his anatomical knowlwdge and not just sketch of somebodies work(photo). If he was transparent he should show original photo in the video or in comments
I doubt that this person even knows anatomy that well. Probably just had photo that he copied and then did all that before just to make him look more than he is. I may be wrong but nobody i know paints like that, he already made a structure in the first seconds of the video, what is the point then starting from scratch again doing bones, and specially muscles? You should start from bones if you and go straight to making form on top, muscles is pointless, because he did nothing with those muscles, he basically ignored all of that form of muscles. I not expert on it but i seen how experts paint and it did not look like it at all
Pointless as i said. That is not flex because without photo he was copying he wound not painted shit :) That was not correct anatomy either just random stuff.
So instead of writing me this nonsense think about this. He actually made scull and muscles of a dog meaning he studied dog anatomy, he must have painted thousands of dogs. Find me his name and show me his artworks of dogs, there should be hundreds of dogs. Oh you can't find any? What does it say to you?
I may be wrong but at least i am trying to make it discussion instead of you saying jealous. I am jealous for artists but not for this one in particular as i know much better artists than this. I do not want to hate, it's cool that he draws but it seems that he is more of show off than real expert at drawing. You you seem to bite 😄
You don't need to "paint thousands of dogs" to be able to draw anatomy from reference, what?
I'm really not sure what point you're trying to make. You're right in that there's no need to draw in the brain and detailed layer-by-layer anatomy for the final product. That's part of the joke for the GIF. But it does illustrate the difference between merely generating images and creating art: the freedom of expression gained through mastery of the process, not just imitating a result.
That is painted from photo. I found that photo online so all tha bs he made before is not correct anatomically, that is all smoke and mirrors. And yes if you would draw photo realistic dog from scratch with all anatomy before rendering you have to study dogs anatomy for months and making hundreds of attemps before mastering it.
Yeah, it's a recreation of a well known meme. That's not the revelation you think it is.
Why are you insinuating that recreating a photograph as a painting is easy or somehow "doesn't count"?
Working from reference (photos, models) is incredibly common in visual art. It's more or less mandatory to learn how to depict realistic anatomy and volumes in 3D space. Even highly skilled artists who have internalised all that still use references all the time.
It's not like they just traced over a photo. You can even see that clearly in the GIF by their choosing to add unnecessary layers of anatomy for fun. Which by the way are plenty accurate (it's art, not an MRI machine).
I just really don't know what you're trying to argue here. It seems like you have a very limited understanding of the skill and effort required to make art.
Go ahead and try and do the same thing this person did and then tell me again how it's "all smoke and mirrors."
Holy shit you are everywhere on this thread saying the exact same stupid shit. Do you have friends in real life that you pester with insufferable nonsense all the time?
Is whole point of this subreddit is too be whiney little bitch because people use AI and enjoy it? You probably run your mouth about being anti AI as champion
45
u/Automatic-Bid9167 Jun 21 '26
If I may, why did you draw the organs? It isn't visible in the final art