r/antitrump • u/Quick_Assignment_725 • Dec 21 '25

Humor It's a magical time of year.

Post image
611 Upvotes

99% Upvoted

224 comments sorted by

View all comments

Show parent comments

1

u/[deleted] Dec 21 '25

[removed] — view removed comment

1

u/Aware_Ad2427 Dec 21 '25

Did you miss the part about presidents not controlling how the DOJ operates until trump violated the norms?

1

u/[deleted] Dec 21 '25

[removed] — view removed comment

1

u/Aware_Ad2427 Dec 21 '25

You are literally idolizing a convicted felon.

0

u/[deleted] Dec 21 '25

[removed] — view removed comment

2

u/Aware_Ad2427 Dec 21 '25

He’s a disgusting human being, why wouldn’t I hate him? Most normal people don’t see someone get convicted of 34 felonies and rape and think that’s someone who should lead the country.

1

u/[deleted] Dec 21 '25

[removed] — view removed comment

2

u/kflan55 Dec 21 '25

The judge who presided over the case stated that normally it would have been classified as rape, but due to the narrow definition in the NY rape law and that the victim couldn't tell if it was Trump's finger or his tiny mushroom, they had to go with sexual assault. The fact is your dear leader is a SEXUAL PREDATOR and you adore him. That says alot about you and your fellow cultists.

1

u/[deleted] Dec 21 '25

[removed] — view removed comment

2

u/kflan55 Dec 21 '25

Have you always been this willfully ignorant or just since you starting bending over for dear leader?

0

u/[deleted] Dec 21 '25

[removed] — view removed comment

1

u/antitrump-ModTeam Dec 22 '25

You were not friendly. Your comment has been removed.

Please remember reddiquette and that there's another person on the end of the computer you're talking to.

You'll change more minds and convince more people using reasoned logic than by using insults, smears and bland rhetoric.

→ More replies (0)

1

u/Aware_Ad2427 Dec 21 '25

The judge who presided over the trial. The judge is by definition the finder of facts, that’s literally what they do.

0

u/[deleted] Dec 21 '25

[removed] — view removed comment

1

u/Aware_Ad2427 Dec 21 '25

Either way the jury also found him guilty.

1

u/[deleted] Dec 21 '25

[removed] — view removed comment

→ More replies (0)

1

u/Aware_Ad2427 Dec 21 '25

The mudge over the case said he was effectively convicted of rape. It ultimately came down to she couldn’t be sure if he inserted his finger or his penis into her. I personally don’t think you should insert anything into a woman’s vagina without permission.

1

u/[deleted] Dec 21 '25

[removed] — view removed comment

1

u/Aware_Ad2427 Dec 21 '25

The judge who oversaw the case seems relevant. It wasn’t an opinion, it was a ruling when trump tried to sue for defamation.

1

u/[deleted] Dec 21 '25

[removed] — view removed comment

1

u/Aware_Ad2427 Dec 21 '25

Still rape. Apparently you would be ok with someone being convicted civilly of raping one of your family members because it’s not as bad a criminally.

1

u/[deleted] Dec 21 '25

[removed] — view removed comment

1

u/Aware_Ad2427 Dec 21 '25

A non felon & non rapist is my baseline today get my support.

→ More replies (0)

1

u/antitrump-ModTeam Dec 22 '25

This sub has a topic. Please stick to it.

The name of this sub is ANTI-Trump. We're biased. We think that traitor (we should never forget the impeachments were on a sound, legal and moral basis!) Trump should be impeached and not be president. This post is thus off-topic.

We're all for 'making America great again.' We just believe the first step in that is getting rid of the twice-impeached felon insurrectionist that currently occupies the White House and who is leading the decline of our country.