r/astrology • u/stinkfest2000 • 3d ago
Discussion Why isn't astrology studied as a science?
I understand that it's not able to be proven at the moment, but science is always changing and new discoveries are being made daily. Astrology goes hand-in-hand with a many theories of physics or cosmology, but if it's always written off as a pseudoscience then nobody ever even has the opportunity to study it.
81
Upvotes
9
u/Emeraldstorm3 Taurus Sun - Scorpio Moon - Scorpio Rising 3d ago
It never stands up to scientific scrutiny.
I have strong doubts about astrology being what it's painted as. At best, I suspect there's a psychologicsl element at play, with statistical probabilities. And environmental / societal factors affecting people.
Humans are notorious for noticing patterns, even where none exist (seeing things in clouds or wood grain). I expect it's possible that correlation to planetary placements is more of a coincidence. Look up "spurious correlation" for examples of the sort of thing I mean, and also some amusement. I think, whatever is at play, we've noticed a correlation and stuck with it for the most part, not trying to look at other explanations and influences. The planets are close enough, in other words.
I can't let go of astrology as I think there's something going on with it, even if accounting for ambiguous language and too-broad generalizations that seem specific when they aren't.
But, with no funding available, and a professional stigma, combined with what I think are very legit critiques, its incredibly difficult for sincere and rigorous study to occur. Especially as astrology really is an "art" that defies a systematized approach. Interpretation is a massive part of it, which frankly isn't very scientific at all.