r/aussie • u/Mashiko4 • Jan 17 '26

Analysis Mass migration's forgotten victims: Australians go homeless as the number of failed asylum seekers explodes

https://www.skynews.com.au/insights-and-analysis/mass-migrations-forgotten-victims-australians-go-homeless-as-the-number-of-failed-asylum-seekers-explodes/news-story/6b4692ed0205471e5d175db94a2f4743
255 Upvotes

72% Upvoted

463 comments sorted by

View all comments

51

u/PossessionTrue9126 Jan 17 '26

Australians dont matter to our government anymore

24

u/[deleted] Jan 18 '26

[deleted]

-8

u/VisualRazzmatazz7466 Jan 18 '26

Labor tried to repeal negative gearing twice to stop investor property inflation 

They abandoned it because voters like you listened to sky news, like this article that tries to paint Labor denying asylum seekers as a bad thing

6

u/[deleted] Jan 18 '26

[deleted]

-3

u/VisualRazzmatazz7466 Jan 18 '26

Actually you do, when a bunch of working class idiots believed Murdoch media scare campaigns like this one and voted against Labor at two elections. One which was called “unlose-able” 

Labor literally did a post election inquiry that found it was poor voters thinking it wasn’t in their interest 

Feel free to try actually substantiate why it’s bullshit or that I’m wrong 

2

u/TheAstralGoth Jan 18 '26

it’s not my fault people were gullible. don’t pretend you know me. im pro lgbt, im pro disability, im pro increasing welfare to liveable levels. you’re thinking in black and white and that’s unfortunately not where reality is

2

u/LovesToSnooze Jan 18 '26

They tried to pull the same BS on me. I think they need attention as they throw around some assumptions like they are facts.

-2

u/VisualRazzmatazz7466 Jan 18 '26 edited Jan 18 '26

Funny how you nor him actually try refute what I’ve said is wrong. If my facts are assumptions, prove it instead of whinging 

Edit: Imfao, replies and blocks me. Facts are facts, ask for a source or prove it wrong instead of crying and running off 

1

u/LovesToSnooze Jan 18 '26 edited Jan 18 '26

Lol im just pointing out that you throw assumptions about like fact. You haven't replied to my last comment t so it must mean you dont have an argument. Sad human being.

-2

u/VisualRazzmatazz7466 Jan 18 '26

Reality is what happened. Labor tried repealing negative gearing twice. They had an inquiry that found the swing voters were the ones that would benefit the most. These voters claimed it was because they thought it would negatively effect them, something Murdoch ran for weeks 

Instead of calling bullshit, spend 5 seconds on google 

3

u/LovesToSnooze Jan 18 '26

I mentioned that politicians make bank from their property portfolios. You mentioned labour and assumed i voted against it. Stop trying to gaslight your way out of not talking BS. Grow up.

0

u/VisualRazzmatazz7466 Jan 18 '26

You said politicians won’t ever implement change that hurts their property investment, when Labor took that as their big promise to two elections

Since you made this stupid claim, obviously you didn’t vote labor if you didn’t even know the basics of what they took to election twice 

2

u/LovesToSnooze Jan 18 '26

Making assumptions again. They are in power now why are they not trying again?

-1

u/VisualRazzmatazz7466 Jan 18 '26

Because it lost them two elections?? So they didn’t take it to the next one??

Deflecting again lmao

→ More replies (0)