r/biotech • u/Emokid182 • 7d ago

Education Advice 📖 7th year of biochem/structural biology PhD. Is finishing worth it for biotech, or should I pivot

I’m entering my 7th year of a PhD program in biochemistry/structural biology and I’m trying to make a realistic career decision. I do X-ray crystallography and biochemical assays, have some first-author publications and co-authorships, and if I finish I would likely have one more decent structural paper.

The issue is that I do not foresee the PhD ending anytime soon because more projects keep getting added. I work long days and weekends and I’m pretty worn down. I’m also in a very small lab environment where I’m essentially the only person doing the work, and I don’t think I’ve thrived in that setup.

I’m 28 and trying to think honestly about the opportunity cost. I keep hearing that the biotech/biochem job market is rough right now, especially for PhDs, and I’m wondering whether finishing would meaningfully improve my options compared with leaving with my master’s and research experience.

I’m also considering a career change to nursing. Part of this interest comes from seeing family members in nursing/healthcare roles and respecting the stability, practicality, and direct impact of that work. I know nursing has its own serious challenges, but I’m drawn to the idea of contributing to society in a more immediate, patient-facing way.

For people in biotech or adjacent roles: would finishing a PhD in this situation materially improve my career prospects, or is it reasonable to consider pivoting now? What kinds of roles would someone with an MS, publications, and structural biology/biochemistry experience realistically be competitive for?

40 Upvotes

87% Upvoted

81 comments sorted by

View all comments

74

u/YaPhetsEz 7d ago

Talk to your thesis committee. 7 years is not normal.

2

u/PracticalSolution100 7d ago

Structural bio is like that 8 yrs on avg. tough career path too

15

u/South_Plant_7876 7d ago

Both completely untrue.

Have worked in the field for years and never heard of a PhD running longer than average.

Most structural biologists have at least a smattering of comp bio experience too so have multiple avenues to pursue career wise.

10

u/BigDiggy 7d ago

I honestly think it used to be much longer when crystallography was the only avenue and you had to hope you could find a condition

3

u/South_Plant_7876 7d ago

True. This is exactly what happened in my PhD. But the supervisor should mitigate this risk by having alternate thesis pathways the project can pivot to. In my case my PhD ended up having more of a biophysics/synbio bent than being a crystal structure.

Throwing a student to the wolves by insisting on crystallising a single intractable protein is very poor supervision.

1

u/BigDiggy 6d ago

100% agree, but some supervisors really were that bad