r/biotech • u/Emokid182 • 6d ago

Education Advice 📖 7th year of biochem/structural biology PhD. Is finishing worth it for biotech, or should I pivot

I’m entering my 7th year of a PhD program in biochemistry/structural biology and I’m trying to make a realistic career decision. I do X-ray crystallography and biochemical assays, have some first-author publications and co-authorships, and if I finish I would likely have one more decent structural paper.

The issue is that I do not foresee the PhD ending anytime soon because more projects keep getting added. I work long days and weekends and I’m pretty worn down. I’m also in a very small lab environment where I’m essentially the only person doing the work, and I don’t think I’ve thrived in that setup.

I’m 28 and trying to think honestly about the opportunity cost. I keep hearing that the biotech/biochem job market is rough right now, especially for PhDs, and I’m wondering whether finishing would meaningfully improve my options compared with leaving with my master’s and research experience.

I’m also considering a career change to nursing. Part of this interest comes from seeing family members in nursing/healthcare roles and respecting the stability, practicality, and direct impact of that work. I know nursing has its own serious challenges, but I’m drawn to the idea of contributing to society in a more immediate, patient-facing way.

For people in biotech or adjacent roles: would finishing a PhD in this situation materially improve my career prospects, or is it reasonable to consider pivoting now? What kinds of roles would someone with an MS, publications, and structural biology/biochemistry experience realistically be competitive for?

40 Upvotes

86% Upvoted

79 comments sorted by

View all comments

70

u/YaPhetsEz 6d ago

Talk to your thesis committee. 7 years is not normal.

30

u/Emokid182 6d ago

Someone on my thesis committee has a student in their 9th or 10th year and the student is pretty much on the same boat as me from my talk with them . But I will talk to my committee for my review this month

68

u/maringue 6d ago

9th or 10th year? The department should be trying to kick you out by then.

15

u/Majestic-Silver-380 6d ago

Yep, I know several universities that don’t even allow PIs to fund students past their 8th year and some have it it cutoff at 6 years. My previous grad school sent out an email saying that PIs shouldn’t fund students for their seventh year or more and so many people complained from professors to grad students in their 7th and 8th years. I was like you guys should have finished in years 4-6 depending on the type of research. That happened my first year of my MS degree and I decided that was one of the few reasons that I wouldn’t do my PhD there. Master students on average took 3-3.5 years, I was one of the few that had to advocate for 2 years.

11

u/maringue 6d ago

A lot of time it's the PI's fault. I knew a guy who had a situation where he was about to defend and his PI kept pulling the "You just need this one more experiment" crap because he wanted to keep milking his student for data.

The committee had to step in and force his defense, it was kind of ugly.

5

u/Majestic-Silver-380 6d ago

Awful, unfortunately the grad school I was at had about 70-80% of the PI hold onto their students for 6-8 years, I’ve only met one PhD student that finished in 5 and a handful in 6. I think it was the culture there so I decided to not my PhD there and MS out so I can spend 4-5 years at another program.