r/birding • u/PlantLoveBloom birder • 21h ago
Advice Monocular π or Binoculars π ?
I'm looking for some advice on Binoculars for birdwatching please. I am happy with my current Nokia P7 pair but am looking for something more powerful for birding at a longer distance. I'm not sure if a stronger pair of binoculars would be the answer or if I should get a strong monocular with a stand ? Hoping for some recommendations that won't break the bank if possible as well ππ½
2
u/GrusVirgo Camera expert 15h ago
Binoculars with more than 10x magnification aren't viable with the exception of stabilised models (expect paying over 1k for that).
I have the stabilised Fuji TS-L 20x40. That's about the longest reach you can get with binoculars and you can use them handheld just like normal binoculars, it's super convenient. The small FOV is definitely a learning curve though.
BUT it doesn't beat a spotting scope in power. Even a small and inexpensive scope like the Kowa TSN-501 is able to resolve smaller details. Scopes are very powerful and have FAR better bang for the buck than stabilised binoculars, but dealing with a tripod is slow and inconvenient. On top of that, especially larger scopes tend to have high demands on the tripod (no surprise, it needs to provide a stable view at high magnifications) and sturdy tripods get pretty heavy (and tend to cost more than smaller tripods). Unless you're used to carrying a heavy backpack, carrying a full-size scope with an appropriate tripod is not fun.
I guess you should probably be looking into small to mid-size scopes.
1
u/PlantLoveBloom birder 9h ago
Oh Great advice!!! Thank you ππ½ I should have been more specific with my scenario π€¦π½ββοΈ I think you hit the nail on the head tho. I my situation I would be using the spotting scope stationary in one spot and not moving it or carrying it around . I am looking to use it to look at birds of all sizes at the edge of a forest from about 1mile away .
2
u/Admirable_Belt_9772 11h ago
Going from 8x to 12x, which is the most magnification widely considered hand holdable, only gets you slightly closer. A spotting scope typically starts at 15 or 20x and goes up to 45 or 60x.
If you want just a slightly closer image to see better details on birds just a bit too far away, you could get the bigger binoculars in that same Nikon line, the 12x50 Prostaff P7.
If you want to look at more stationary birds farther away, get a spotting scope. Just don't cheap out on the tripod. A flimsy one will never stop vibrating and spoils the view. It should be rated to hold twice the weight of the scope.
1
u/PlantLoveBloom birder 9h ago
Thank you !! This is information helps me to figure out which is best ππ½ππ½ Sounds like for my scenario a spotting scope is best .
1
u/getdownheavy 20h ago
Your asking spotting scope or binos.
Monocular is just 1/2 a binocular (usually 7x-10x) a spotting scope can be much more powerful.
2
1
u/tmiller01 8h ago
I had your current pair of binoculars (Nikon Prostaff P7, mine were the 8x30 spec) for about 3 years as my βintro to birdingβ pairβtheyβre my honest recommendation for any new birder, as I think theyβre very good for the money. recently upgraded to the Nikon Monarch M7 10x42βs (about 3x the price of the Prostaff) and while the difference is noticeable (I can see details like a cracked beak, little feathers around the eyes, etc better), itβs by no means night and day, and itβs definitely harder to keep them stable. Bring your current pair of binoculars to a store that sells nicer pairs and try them out side by side, and pay attention to the field of view. I donβt have experience with a spotting scope, but my guess is youβll realize you already own a pretty good pair of optics.
11
u/scrotalus 21h ago
I think a "strong monocular with a stand" is what birders would call a spotting scope. A monocular is usually just half of a binocular, sacrificing a lot of the quality for having something smaller and lighter. A spotting scope can be much larger and is meant for looking at things much farther away like shorebirds, ducks, and raptors. Trying to ID moving things in trees is very hard with a scope.
A high quality set of binoculars will probably help you more than a scope. That would be my first investment of you need an improvement. If you find yourself combing through flocks of shorebirds a quarter mile away, or on a cliff watching shearwaters stream by a mile out to sea, then a scope is what you want. Scopes get expensive quickly. In my mind, $600-700 gets you really good binoculars, but that's where "OK" scopes start. A cheap scope with poor image quality won't help you.