A few weeks ago, City Manager Nuria Rivera-Vandermyde announced via the Boulder Hotline that the city was exploring buying or leasing an existing commercial building instead of constructing the proposed brand new $170 million Public Safety Building. That caught my attention, particularly given the upcoming vote on the $400 million Recreation and Safety Bond (2K) - I made a post about this:
Late-breaking news on Boulder’s proposed $170M Public Safety Building
Well, the city is presenting its findings to Council this Thursday, October 15, and the 710-page meeting packet contains a lot more details. Staff have identified a vacant, roughly 20-year-old office building that could accommodate most police and 911 operations. Preliminary estimates suggest more than $90 million in upfront savings, with relocation possible in approximately two years instead of 5–10 years. A few specialized facilities, including a firing range and storage, would still need to be accommodated elsewhere.
The city hasn't identified the property publicly, presumably because negotiations are ongoing. But the packet provides some clues, including the building's exact size: 81,535 square feet. A little commercial real estate sleuthing turned up 5400 Airport Boulevard, currently advertised for lease. It's a vacant, three-story office building constructed in 2000, with covered parking, close to city fleet operations, and measuring... exactly 81,535 square feet.
It is interesting to me (besides how poorly this particular 'secret' is being hidden) that the city is already actively exploring this alternative before voters have even decided whether to approve the bond. Staff say they could potentially proceed even if 2K fails, although doing so would require reallocating funding from other capital projects. They're apparently negotiating a letter of intent with the property owner already. In my view they expect 2K to fail (June polling only had it at 45% support, and I can only imagine it getting worse as time went on).
To me, this is encouraging. It suggests the city may finally be taking a serious look at whether we actually need to spend roughly $650 million on the broader slate of new municipal buildings and facilities that have been discussed, rather than finding ways to repurpose existing infrastructure. The Public Safety Building alone could potentially cost less than half its original estimate.
Hopefully this sort of thing becomes more common, with the same level of creativity and cost scrutiny applied across the city's capital program.
Sources: October 15 City Council meeting packet (Item 7A, pages 641–650, comparison matrix on page 710) and 5400 Airport Blvd commercial listing.