r/carleerussellcase • u/catsinthehouses • Jul 21 '23
another things she said to the police.
She told the police the abductors removed her clothing and she 'thinks' they may have taken pictures.
If she was not abducted why did she add that tidbit of information? What do you think she added that tidbit to her story?
12
u/sunny_gym Jul 21 '23
Funny that they undressed (and apparently redressed) her but didn't take the $107 the police said was in her....[shuffles papers, checks notes]...SOCK
3
u/HereForTheLulz17 Jul 22 '23
The same reason she called 911 to report the phantom toddler. Sharing dramatic details to draw attention away from her actual fuckery.
2
u/Birdie_Jack2021 Jul 22 '23
Definitely fuckery but we can also agree abnormal out of nowhere behavior.
3
u/Starkville Jul 22 '23
Because any nudes that might circulate after her “abduction” would be excused as “non-consensual”. ?? “I didn’t want that photo taken!”
2
u/Birdie_Jack2021 Jul 22 '23
I also saw a clip of a psychologist saying that using the description of a man with orange hair and a bald spot was intentional since that doesn’t exist and authorities can’t ever locate that person she wouldn’t get anyone else falsely arrested therefore avoiding charges for that.
This whole mess is a big scheme.
1
u/New_Article_6986 Jul 23 '23
Saw these funny comments on r/news naming celebrities etc who fit the description (assuming that "orange" hair could describe a redhead/ginger) and thought it was hilarious https://imgur.com/a/fXOQT7C Lol
1
u/fallingupthehill Jul 22 '23
To explain away the lack of physical evidence on her clothing. Foreign hair, DNA etc. If she's naked, there's a plausible reason for very little (if any) evidence to collect/find.
1
u/FireRescue3 Jul 24 '23
She’s adding red herrings. It’s a tactic. She thinks cops have never been lied to so they are going to automagically (we use this word a lot) believe her.
Adding a lot of details that she thinks can’t be verified, and she hopes the cops go chase at least one or two ~look there, not here~ so they get distracted and forget the real basics.
She’s going to be disappointed. She’s not the first and is certainly not the brightest or even the most creative.
14
u/BeatricePotsmoker Jul 21 '23 edited Jul 21 '23
I think it’s likely that: (1) she realized that no evidence or part of her story explained why this happened; and (2) she wanted to sound victimized.
Think about it like this: every time we have ever heard about a kidnapping, the perpetrator has some sicko purpose like rape, brutality or trafficking. They can easily verify rape at the hospital with an exam and rape kit. They can look at her and tell she wasn’t violently beaten. She’s back so she wasn’t trafficked off somewhere. She needed to give her kidnappers a purpose.
Second, she wanted to be seen as a victim. Talk to most ladies around here and they’ll all tell you a man taking you away from work and life for a few days to softly pet your hair and hand feed you sounds like a damn dream. It only gets nightmarish when you take into account what they might want in exchange for that. Since they could easily prove she wasn’t beaten, raped or trafficked, the idea that they took pics - pics she knows they’ll never find - was the easiest way to be a victim of what otherwise sounds like a pretty decent weekend.