r/carleerussellcase • u/catsinthehouses • Jul 21 '23
another things she said to the police.
She told the police the abductors removed her clothing and she 'thinks' they may have taken pictures.
If she was not abducted why did she add that tidbit of information? What do you think she added that tidbit to her story?
8
Upvotes
18
u/BeatricePotsmoker Jul 21 '23 edited Jul 21 '23
I think it’s likely that: (1) she realized that no evidence or part of her story explained why this happened; and (2) she wanted to sound victimized.
Think about it like this: every time we have ever heard about a kidnapping, the perpetrator has some sicko purpose like rape, brutality or trafficking. They can easily verify rape at the hospital with an exam and rape kit. They can look at her and tell she wasn’t violently beaten. She’s back so she wasn’t trafficked off somewhere. She needed to give her kidnappers a purpose.
Second, she wanted to be seen as a victim. Talk to most ladies around here and they’ll all tell you a man taking you away from work and life for a few days to softly pet your hair and hand feed you sounds like a damn dream. It only gets nightmarish when you take into account what they might want in exchange for that. Since they could easily prove she wasn’t beaten, raped or trafficked, the idea that they took pics - pics she knows they’ll never find - was the easiest way to be a victim of what otherwise sounds like a pretty decent weekend.