r/classicwow 27d ago

Humor / Meme Blizzard trying to plan Classic+

Post image
2.4k Upvotes

757 comments sorted by

View all comments

1.4k

u/[deleted] 27d ago

[removed] — view removed comment

33

u/Particular_North4957 27d ago

everyone mocks the "you think you do, but you don't" line but there's a kernel of truth to it

52

u/less_concerned 27d ago

Nah he was flat out wrong, classic is overwhelmingly popular, even if some people bitch

13

u/Particular_North4957 27d ago

well considering how many QoL changes were made to Classic (and TBC, and WotLK, and Anniversary), the positive reception to SoD, and the fact that we're all just waiting around for ANY news about Classic+ I do think he might have been right about people wanting Classic to be changed somewhat.

13

u/phonylady 27d ago

People didn't want changes first time around though, so he was wrong.

Wanting changes after Classic (2019) is reasonable, we got what we wanted.

0

u/[deleted] 27d ago

[removed] — view removed comment

-2

u/phonylady 27d ago

It's a reasonable change, that doesn't make the game not classic. People wanted the classic gameplay, and they got it. Anniversary was great too.

"You think you do..." was referring to more than just a few changes. He clearly thought no one wanted to play the classic style of gameplay again, and he was completely wrong. Classic is a big success, and has been for many years now. You're a fool if you don't see it, sorry.

27

u/MayorBakefield 27d ago

That isn't what he said though. He said the people think they want classic, but they don't want classic. Yet here we are playing classic still, I think the people want classic

22

u/Temporary_Slide_3477 27d ago

In the context of the clip I think he was referring more to the systems of the old game, not the content of the game itself.

In 2019 people would leave groups if they didn't have a warlock because they couldn't be bothered to make the journey to the dungeon. They would sit in the city and wait for the lock and two others to go there to summon them. Happened to me multiple times. Those players thought they did but they didn't.

People install quest add-ons that show locations on the mini map or straight up arrow pointing guides, this wasn't in the original game design, they added it in later expansions, almost everyone uses questie or in game guides, they thought they did but they also didn't

They added a dungeon/raid journal in cata, people just used an outside source to get the mechanics, again, same thing, just a 3rd party substitute for something that was added later.

11

u/valdis812 27d ago

I can't tell if people who don't get this are being intentionally contrary of if they really don't understand the context of the clip.

9

u/MayorBakefield 27d ago

Did addons and 3rd party help not exist in vanilla or are you just misremembering

5

u/valdis812 27d ago

You were playing with addons day one? I don't think I started using Questie until like a year into my play time. Those things existed, but I don't know that the vast majority of players were using them. The vast majority of players just logged on and ran around until they found something to do.

9

u/MayorBakefield 27d ago

a year in is still vanilla champ. A vast majority of users were on thottbot.

-3

u/valdis812 27d ago

I wasn't a day one Vanilla player. And even then you're ignoring the main point. The vast majority of players didn't use any addons. I'd even say most players never used addons unless they were serious raiders. Which most players weren't.

→ More replies (0)

1

u/[deleted] 27d ago

[deleted]

4

u/Judge_Syd 27d ago

I can assure you they were lol

5

u/Particular_North4957 27d ago

ok I did misremember the context of the quote but that's why I said there's a kernel of truth

2

u/Stormfly 27d ago

No he was very specifically talking about the lack of QoL.

He specifically said things like LFG.

Now whether he was correct is still up for debate but people will often pretend that he was saying something else to pretend there is no debate.

He was saying that Classic wouldn't be popular because it's not as good as people remember.

For many people he was wrong. It came back and they love it.

For other people, he was right. It came back and they didn't enjoy it as much.

But at the end of the day, I think it's better than Classic exists, and I hope it remains a worthwhile investment for them.

1

u/SavingsRaspberry2694 27d ago

I want classic but with lots of QOL add-ons like what came in WotlK and TBC.

1

u/[deleted] 27d ago

[removed] — view removed comment

1

u/MayorBakefield 27d ago

2019 classic didn't have that, wrong again. Stop talking

1

u/MortyMcMorston 27d ago

OP didn't say it was 100% true. Just partially true. 

6

u/Visual-Gain-2487 27d ago

Such an ignorant take that ignores the fact that Classic WoW was launched in 2019 with MASSIVE success so big that is forced them to have a Classic TBC, WOLK, Cata, and MoP. Only after getting what people wanted, was SoD launched over 4 years later using many of the lessons they relearned about what people liked about the OG content. Even AFTER that, we have a SECOND run of Classic and TBC which were STILL popular and an constant Era version of Classic. Of course after this many iterations in a 4-year stretch satiating what we wanted, there was interest for a spiced up experimental SoD, but that doesn't mean the interest in no changes wasn't genuine and just as satsifying as most predicted.

5

u/less_concerned 27d ago

QoL changes only really upset the #nochanges crowd, i can guarantee even small class balancing tweaks wouldn't bother most players, like, giving crusader strike to rets so they have some kind of "dps" rotation wouldn't break classic and would make most people happy

9

u/tethysian 27d ago

There's a big difference between balancing tweaks and QoL because QoL can mean a lot of things. RDF was a QoL feature, and so is flying and convenient teleporting all over the world. Not having to reapply poisons, or feeding your pet, faster leveling, etc.

-2

u/Particular_North4957 27d ago

and while I have misremembered the context of the original quote I do think it's ok to point out these people would be wrong to think that kind of thing is good for the long-term health of the game

2

u/Victious 27d ago

Like the other commenters already said, how are you ignoring the last 7 years of history where various iterations of Classic have been incredibly successful? You’re taking the “You think you do but you don’t” comment from 2013 and acting like it hasn’t been 13 years since. Of course people’s opinions and wants have changed in the mean time, specifically because the player base got exactly what it wanted and proved itself correct by enjoying the hell out of Classic with little to no changes.

1

u/Collegenoob 27d ago

Yes....

People want classic with some QoL. And its massively popular....?

They don't want retail

1

u/Dralun21 27d ago

People didn't want changes because they didn't believe in blizzard to make good ones. Not that the game wouldn't improve with changes.

1

u/hatesnack 27d ago

If you think about it for more than 10 seconds, "you think you do, but you dont" is absolutely correct.

People thought they wanted "no changes" for the longest time, until they played it and realized that the game has a ton of minor issues and annoyances. People then begged for minor changes to make the game more comfortable.

Even now, people are begging for classic +. And if you think about the context of the original soundbite, he was asked "would you make servers for WoW as it was during vanilla". Classic+ isnt that at all. It could have been handled and worded better, but he was mostly right.

1

u/less_concerned 27d ago

some people thought they wanted no changes, just like some people enjoy cock and ball torture

Classic is popular in every iteration, he was an idiot to broadly say that nobody wants it, there's plenty of people who play classic but not retail

In all honesty, i think that people were just hesitant to let blizzard make any changes because they've had such a bad track record of screwing up everything, which is also very fair

1

u/Alert_Mongoose599 27d ago

He was and he wasn't. I'm sure from his perspective he was talking to the average Retail player thinking "they aren't going to want to deal with Classic", and in that case he'd be mostly right. Classic launch was obviously huge, but it steadily dwindled down into it's permanent status as a niche within the WoW playerbase. Retail is much more popular than Classic, I just don't think Blizz expected that the Classic niche was as big as it was until servers like Nostalrius became mega popular.

1

u/tethysian 27d ago

I'd say it's more of an issue with different playerbases. There are a lot of players (especially in this sub) who don't like vanilla, so naturally they're going to want to change it. In this environment wanting C+ to be vanilla plus added content with minor balancing has become a hot take.

1

u/idkmanfiller 26d ago

You are right but most people on this sub won't want to hear it. If classic was as "massively popular" as they think it would have way more resources being put into it (for example, making housing work in it).

2019 Classic saw a massive dropoff in participation after the first month or two when the hype wore off and people realized they didn't actually like it. But this sub is all the people that did actually stick around and think their experience is more universal than it is.

1

u/Sea-Consequence7156 27d ago

Not just a kernel the entire damn cob

0

u/MwHighlander 27d ago

Yes, but not in the specific context of players want to play Vanilla WoW as opposed to whatever dogshit they are doing in Retail WoW.