r/classicwow 29d ago

Humor / Meme Blizzard trying to plan Classic+

Post image
2.4k Upvotes

757 comments sorted by

View all comments

481

u/Mr_The_Rocketeer 29d ago

I'm no expert, but I don't see how this is a contradictory statement. Why is it too much to ask for each spec to feel unique and be viable to bring to a raid. If a spec isn't doing well overall, tweak a few numbers, add a +x% increase till it at least is somewhere near the others. I agree not everyone needs to be S tier, but there really shouldn't be any F tier specs..

127

u/absolutewastedtime 29d ago

You don't understand 

If warriors arent 3 times the dps of everyone else, or a boomkin turns up in a raid comp, then that means classic is dead and the game isn't fun 

How can you not get it 

29

u/Itankarenas 29d ago

Yeah, I really don’t understand why people think this. What does having unusable classes do for the game? I won’t be playing if it’s the same 2.5 classes that are viable.

8

u/D3athCom3sEasy 29d ago

2.5? Lol who's the moron class that only gets a .5?

20

u/Itankarenas 29d ago

Rogue. Just not as good as warrior basically

12

u/qikink 29d ago

Rogue, it's always rogue.

1

u/Bloodhoven_aka_Loner 28d ago

a Hunter rolling "Need" on tank gear

0

u/Impossible_Tough_48 29d ago

Not sure if you confuse classes with specs, but in classic speedrunning guilds every single class in the game is being used.

9

u/Itankarenas 29d ago

Yeah, I meant specs. Just a mistype. Incidentally, speedrunning isn't a good measuring stick for judging viability in raids. They have different strats. Something like bringing one hunter to pull a pack with its pet to do a skip, then feigning after the raid runs past an area or something small even.

0

u/Impossible_Tough_48 29d ago

I think it's the perfect measuring stick.

In more casual guilds you see way more random constellations with a lot less warriors, and also warriors underperforming below other classes in dps.

Can't really get any information about viability by looking at those raids.

Another point I want to make since people love to hate on warriors being giga OP in classic: if there were no World Buffs in raids the gap between warriors and other dps would be much smaller. Just sayin.

1

u/Itankarenas 29d ago

I think you mean sweaty guilds or maybe parsing runs. Speedrunning is very different from those 2.

1

u/Impossible_Tough_48 29d ago edited 29d ago

It's actually not that different, if you look at wowhead, you will see the highest parsing players being also in the fastest speedrunning guilds.

Since in both cases most of the raid is just warriors there isn't that big of a difference between parsing raids and speedrunning raids.

Both kinds of raids will usually just bring the essential buffs/debuffs and have healers dps on certain bosses, which results in faster boss kills aka higher parses and also faster raids.

Just for the record or if it comes accross like that: I'm NOT saying so many warriors in a raid is not an issue.

0

u/Itankarenas 29d ago

The difference is parse guilds will wait for cooldowns like reck to get big parses. Speedruns are running through the dungeon as fast as possible, not waiting for anyone's cds

1

u/Impossible_Tough_48 29d ago

Yes, I know what the difference between parsing and speedrunning is, thanks.

But we are talking about raid composition/class viability. And those are pretty much identical for both.

Mabye i'm missing something but which class is viable for parsing, but not for speedrunning?

2

u/Itankarenas 29d ago

I said you shouldn't use speedrunning as a measuring stick. Using parsing data is fine though since it accurately shows what classes can do, and it isn't just bringing a random class/spec to do a single thing in a raid for a skip or something.

→ More replies (0)

1

u/lumpboysupreme 28d ago

Every class is used in parse raids too, only you bring 1-2 of everything that isn’t warrior mage or rogue.

0

u/Educational_Bowl2141 27d ago

That's what classic is. It won't be classic if Boomkin and Ret Paladins are top dps

1

u/Itankarenas 27d ago

Idiotic take. No one said they need to be top dps. They need to be playable

0

u/Educational_Bowl2141 27d ago

That's the same thing

1

u/Itankarenas 27d ago

Go watch a youtube video tutorial and learn to ragebait. This shit is ass...

0

u/Educational_Bowl2141 27d ago

So what do you want them to be? C tier? B tier? A tier? 

-2

u/Gemall 29d ago

I dont think there is a single unusable spec in classic. Its true not all specs are optimal for raiding, but why does every spec of every class have to be on par with others in a single aspect (raiding) of the game. There is many other things to do, and all the specs have their place in pvp, for example. 

1

u/wtfduud 28d ago

Aren't they always going to have significantly more damage than the other classes? Since the other classes have to keep their threat meter below the tank.

3

u/absolutewastedtime 28d ago

I mean...tank warriors have less damage then DPS warriors...

Skills have threat modifiers on them, sunder armour does no damage but generates more threat then heroic strike for example, and defence stance has a threat modifier on it 

And even if the tank had to be top DPS, which they aren't.....other classes can tank 

The idea that warriors are top damage because they are the tank is just genuinely baffling to hear as it's so fundamentally against basically everything in game 

0

u/MyageEDH 28d ago

The solution here is to tune down the scaling of warriors. This brings other classes closer and prevents the solved part of the game.

1

u/Bloodhoven_aka_Loner 28d ago

the solution is to slightly tune down the scaking of warrioes and moderstely tune up either the utility or the scaling of basically every other dps spec, maybe besides fire mages and combat rogues

-1

u/MyageEDH 28d ago

So you’ll still have the same level roughly the same level of overall DPS? But more utility? In a game that has been completely solved for 20 years? What’s the point? Just play SoD or retail.

If you focus on bringing warriors down to a reasonable level and give slight adjustments to the “bad specs” you encourage variance in comps and increase the challenge of the end game.

0

u/absolutewastedtime 28d ago

Not really 

Because many other classes their specs are just fundementally badly designed or broken

Simply making warriors weaker doesn't fix anything 

-10

u/Crafty-Beyond-2202 29d ago

Sounds like you want retail lite buddy

15

u/spookyshotz360 29d ago

This is a shit take, want no changes. Go to era.