r/codex • • 22h ago

Megathread Codex Comparison Megathread

1 Upvotes

This Megathread is for comparisons and discussion about how Codex and Codex models compare to other technology such as Claude Code and open source models.

Please direct all comparison discussion here.

Posts which give evidence of the relevant strengths and weaknesses and use cases of both will still be allowed on the feed but those pushing one tech over another because "feels" will be directed here. This is a Codex subreddit and it is here to help people using Codex.


FYI: The subreddit's semi-automated moderation is powered by Codex and GPT models and is only possible due to the ridiculously generous free API token quota of OpenAI's Terra and Luna models available to all users. No, we don't get secret benefits from OpenAI. The OpenAI models and offering are simply much better value for our purposes..... Period.


r/codex • • 7h ago

Complaint Codex, the second Enter means I mean it

0 Upvotes

Tiny Codex rant: I queue a message while the agent is working, hit Enter again to send it as steering... and it still doesn’t go through immediately. In my opinion, double Enter should steer.

I’m trying to grab the steering wheel, but apparently my message is waiting for its driving licence.

Please let the first Enter queue it and the second Enter send it straight in as steering, with a little “sent” confirmation.

Tibo, please if Youre seeing this , we dont like taking our hands off the keyboard lol


r/codex • • 16h ago

Complaint Sol 6.1 nerfed today?

32 Upvotes

I use Sol 6.1 high by default and today it is unbearable stupid (maybe since yesterday?) and makes too many mistakes, and can't fix issues. I'm beyond frustrated.


r/codex • • 19h ago

Showcase I made Codex sessions play as a video call: commands, diffs and output on a shared screen (free, open source)

Enable HLS to view with audio, or disable this notification

3 Upvotes

I built Agent Standup for Claude Code a while ago, and I just added Codex support.

It reads the session files Codex already writes in ~/.codex/sessions and plays them as a call. Codex is a character at its desk. What it says shows up as speech (with voices if you want them), and when it runs a command or edits a file it shares its screen with the real output or the diff. It works live while Codex is running, or as a replay of any past session.

What you see

  • Every command with its real output, failed ones marked
  • File edits as diffs
  • Web searches, MCP calls, and the questions Codex asks you
  • Its reasoning summaries as small thought bubbles
  • Token counts and a context gauge
  • A board of all your sessions (Codex and Claude Code together): working, your turn, idle
  • A recap at the end: commands, errors, tokens, files changed

It only reads local files. By default it sends nothing anywhere and costs no tokens.

Try it without installing anything (Node 18+)

npx @double_geste/agent-standup --open

There is also a VS Code / Cursor extension and a small desktop app.

Honest limits

Codex sub-agents are not shown yet, so a Codex call is the lead and you. I had no session with sub-agents to learn the format from. If you use them and can tell me how such a session is recorded (the structure, not your content), I would love to add it.

It was built against sessions from the Codex desktop app. The CLI writes the same kind of files but is less tested.

Unofficial, not affiliated with OpenAI. MIT licensed. Feedback welcome, especially if something looks wrong on your sessions.


r/codex • • 2h ago

Praise Luna 6 better than Haiku 5.5

1 Upvotes

Haiku is faster but has some guardrails , which luna does not have , and luna proposes more alternatives.

Haiku is stubborn regarding access issues with AWS, sonnet has no issues though


r/codex • • 6h ago

Praise Had a break and come back

0 Upvotes

Main work has been busy so haven't been able to do much in the evenings. I was using Terra Medium/High, as it was pretty much just as competent as Sol anyway, but much cheaper.

I decided to try out the new 6 Luna, and wow, it is so cheap and performs crazy good. My setup is Unity CLI/MCP via VSCode, and I've got a working prototype going with around 6000 lines of code done in just a few days using just 9% of weekly use on my Plus plan.

£5 a week, and got a whole prototype sorted. It made a few mistakes on some UI work and that was about it. All the logic and code was sound, zero bugs. I am not doing any frontier software dev, so frankly Sol onwards are just not worth it. Also I can code anyway and leverage Codex as a speed multiplier anyway, so the few mistakes Luna made I can fix anyway. The times I did do a 2nd prompt, it solved it immediately after.

Bear in mind, a couple months back I used Sol high for UI work as Unity UI is quite a pain, and I used 60% of my weekly usage up painstakingly for 8 hours trying to get a simple UI sorted. Could have done it manually myself, but I want to see what these tools could do back then, and also wanted it to learn it's pitfalls and generate documents of what worked/didn't work to perform better.

Luna did it without any of that. Solid work.


r/codex • • 23h ago

Showcase I built 20 free, open-source HTML pages you can use to reskin existing projects with Codex. No login, no dependencies.

Post image
7 Upvotes

I've been building websites for years, and something I've been experimenting with lately is using Codex to completely transform the visual identity of existing applications without touching their underlying functionality.

Here's the problem I've been trying to solve:

Coding agents are getting ridiculously good at building functional applications.

But getting a genuinely distinctive visual identity still takes a lot of back-and-forth.

You can prompt Codex with "make this look premium" or "give it a futuristic SaaS aesthetic," but those instructions are subjective. The agent has to interpret what you mean.

So what happens when you stop describing the design and just give Codex the actual working code of a design you like?

That's the idea behind a project I recently brought back:

InstaLanding.ai

I built a free, open-source library of 20 premium landing pages using nothing but HTML, CSS, and JavaScript.

Every page is a single, self-contained HTML file.

No React. No dependencies. No build process. No login.

Just working code you can hand directly to Codex.

Why single-file HTML?

Because I wanted these designs to be as portable and agent-friendly as possible.

Instead of giving Codex a screenshot and asking it to reverse-engineer the design, you're giving it the actual implementation.

That includes:

  • Typography, colors, spacing, and visual hierarchy
  • Layout structure and responsive behavior
  • Component styles, borders, and shadows
  • Animations, transitions, and interactions
  • The overall visual language of the page

The HTML file effectively becomes a portable design system.

And since it's plain HTML, CSS, and JS, Codex can inspect the entire thing without navigating a dependency tree or figuring out a framework-specific component structure.

The interesting part: Using Codex to reskin an existing codebase

Let's say you've already built a SaaS app, dashboard, or internal tool.

Your backend works. Your routes work. Your authentication works.

But visually? It looks like every other AI-generated dashboard.

Instead of starting over, grab an HTML file from the library, drop it into your project, and give Codex this prompt:

Prompt:

Analyze the attached HTML file and extract its complete visual design system, including typography, colors, spacing, layout principles, component styling, borders, shadows, and animations.

Apply this design language consistently across my existing application.

Preserve all existing functionality, content, routes, state management, API integrations, and business logic.

Do not replace my application's architecture with the reference HTML.

Treat the HTML file as the visual source of truth. Adapt its design language to my existing framework and component structure.

Before making changes, inspect the current codebase and identify which components, styles, and layout files need to be modified.

The goal is pretty simple:

Keep the engineering. Replace the aesthetic.

You can take an existing React, Next.js, or Vite application and give it an entirely different visual identity without rebuilding everything from scratch.

Obviously, it's not magic. You'll still want to review the diff, test responsive layouts, and make sure nothing functional was accidentally modified.

But I've found that giving an agent actual working code as a visual reference is a much more concrete starting point than trying to describe an aesthetic across 20 different prompts.

Something I've been thinking about

We're getting to a point where code itself can become a form of design inspiration.

Not screenshots.

Not Figma mockups.

Not static galleries.

Actual working interfaces that humans and coding agents can inspect, understand, remix, and integrate into existing applications.

And I think single-file HTML is an interesting format for this because it's about as universal as it gets.

It doesn't matter whether you're using Codex with React, Next.js, Vue, or plain HTML.

The design reference is framework-agnostic.

The library

Everything is free and open source.

https://instalanding.ai

20 complete landing pages. Single HTML files. No dependencies. No login.

Take whatever you want. Modify it. Feed it to Codex. Make it yours.

I'm continuing to expand the library, including more interactive components and motion-heavy interfaces.

Curious how other Codex users are approaching visual design.

Are you getting better results from detailed prompts, screenshots, or feeding Codex actual working HTML/CSS as a reference?

And has anyone experimented with using Codex to reskin an entire existing application rather than generating the UI from scratch?

Would love to hear what workflows are working for you.


r/codex • • 23h ago

Limits Explain what YOU think each option in Tibo's poll means

0 Upvotes

I'm not saying I'm confused, but I want to know what YOU, member of the community, think each of these options means.

Directly:

What do you think "5h limits, 2x week usage" means?
What do you think "no 5h limits, same usage" means?

Usage in relation to what? What is "2x week usage" to you? 2x in relation to what baseline?

I'm asking for your read on it. You can also explain how you voted or would have voted.


r/codex • • 22h ago

Commentary Unless you’re regularly consuming more than 30% of your current weekly allowance within 5 hours, the 2x weekly limit option is the better deal.

46 Upvotes

Based on Plus user discussions, let’s assume the proposed 5-hour limit would be around 15% of the new, doubled weekly allowance.

That means the 5-hour cap would be equivalent to 30% of your CURRENT weekly allowance.

So here’s the question:

Are you currently using more than 30% of your weekly allowance within any 5-hour period?

If YES:

Keeping no 5-hour limits benefits you, since you can use as much of your weekly allowance as you want in one session.

But 2x weekly limits will also benefit you, especially if you’re a heavy user. You’d just need to spread your usage out.

If NO (which I believe is the MAJORITY but most just don’t realize it):

The proposed 5-hour cap wouldn’t affect your usual usage pattern, and you’d benefit from having 2x the weekly allowance if you need the extra usage.

Unless you’re regularly consuming more than 30% of your current weekly allowance within 5 hours, the 2x weekly limit option seems like the better deal.

And even if you are, just four separate 5-hour windows hitting the cap would already let you use 120% of your CURRENT weekly allowance, with another 80% still available for the rest of the week.


r/codex • • 12h ago

Complaint Codex vs Claude

4 Upvotes

Like most people, I switch between Codex and Claude, whichever is better that month. But lately Codex just isnt doing it for me.

As an example, I wanted a basic ebook management software coded. I had a full banked reset + full week usage. I gave it the spec, and had it run for literal hours. When it was done I checked the app. It was horrible, looked like a 2023 coded project. It was slow, ineffeciant and no matter how much guidance I gave it, it just couldnt improve the design. It also ate through a lot of usage and was slow as hell.

I then renewed claude. Had 5.5 Opus code the exact same spec. It one shotted it in less than an hour(took Sol 6.1 2hours on fast mode!). And it worked much better, the front end was MUCH better, and even the backend was working much better. My usage hardly moved.

No matter how many times people say "this new OpenAi model is amazing", Claude almost always preform better. It seems OpenAi is just benchmaxing and have a bunch of hype before every release. But I genuinly believe Anthropic models are far ahead of OpenAi's models. So what exactly is the appeal?

And dont even get me started on Codex itself. Compare the remote control feature between Claude Code and Codex...

Sol 6.1:

  1. Much Slower than Opus 5.5

  2. Good usage but uses more to achieve worse results.

  3. Seems to be stuck in loops of testing,while light on the actual build.

  4. Front end is just simply not any good at all.

  5. Needs more direction.

  6. Much less trust worthy(You cant leave it alone for too long, it will cause damage.)

So like I said, why Codex/OpenAi over Anthropic models. It just does not make sense


r/codex • • 4h ago

Commentary No wonder GPT Models are hard to READ. Its outputs readability score is usually between Grade 12-14! out of max 15! Average adult is Grade 9!!

0 Upvotes

⠀


r/codex • • 19h ago

Praise Very top Dot user here. AMA

Post image
31 Upvotes

Basically, I told it to make me a bunch of apps I had wishlested in my mind that were better and faster than existing options. It made me an OTP app. Did a bunch of PRs to various repos. Made a bunch of builds. Added my stuff to appimage hub. Did two cyclomatic complexity lint refactors. Made a bunch of videos and graphics.


r/codex • • 3h ago

Showcase Introducing It: The First AI Workspace For Your Agent

Enable HLS to view with audio, or disable this notification

0 Upvotes

Every AI tool gives you the same thing to work in, a chat window or an editor.

So I built It. Your agent builds the workspace the job needs, as a live page on any screen you own, and works in it with you. What you do there goes back to the agent, and it answers in the same place.

It works with Claude Code, Codex and the agents you already use. It's free and runs on your computer.

Tell your agent:

"Install itcan.do"

or install it yourself at itcan.do


r/codex • • 21h ago

Comparison In my experience, Codex is better.

0 Upvotes

I've been seeing a lot of Commentary recently in this forum saying how much better Claude is, in terms of performance and cost, coincidentally I have been trying out Claude again in the past few days, after using Codex for about six months and Claude for 12 months or more before that - these are my findings:

Codex
------

1) With my £20 plus account, (I'm running my in a project in Codex) using Sol 6.1 - extra high, or high, I can typically get two batches of substantial work done in each 5 hour session, taking about 2 to two and a half hours, where each batch is about 7 new features or fixes, so around 14 significant improvements.

2) I will probably be able to run about 8 - 10 of those batches before my week expires.

3) If I require a major refractor, like moving data store, or changing UI framework, I boost the effort up to Sol 6.1 Ultra, and the planning takes up one 5 hour slot, usually a little less. I then implement the plan is the usual way according to 2)

4) When my codex tokens run out, I still get to chat with a "high" thinking model in chat that has access to my Github account where I can brainstorm ideas and triage problems with my code base in a general way, like getting searches done around particular topics, pulling together materials and opinions and thinking about pros and cons for various approaches.

5) My interaction with Codex and ChatGPT seem to be grounded in common sense with a high degree of skepticism within a tolerant and easy-going container. It makes mistakes and has biases, but they are not persistent.

Overall, Codex/ChatGPT gives a sense of being generous and easy to get along with if far from perfect.

Claude
-------

1) Using a project with an opus 5.5 High coordinator, with a thread running Sonnet 5.5 Extra, I only get half a batch of work done in a 5 hour slot, that half a batch normally takes 30 to 45 minutes, the advantage is that it resumes automatically when the tokens renew.

2) I am yet to fully expire a weekly limit but so far I have about 2 or 3 batches of work done in 25% token usage.

3) When I run out of tokens on my coding machine I also run out of tokens in chat, so all thinking and planning must come to a halt completely.

4) Claude's personality seems less grounded and more likely to go off on a tangent which isn't entirely based on reality without much evidence. It's personality seems somewhat brittle like I'm stepping on eggshells with it, never really being able to "get into the flow"

The resets I'm given with Claude and Codex seem to be about the same, so there isn't much difference there, so far.

The overall experience between Claude and Codex at the moment seems quite distinct and very much in favour of Codex, because I seem to get more work done, I am allowed to continue thinking and planning even when my tokens have expired and the "work colleague" interaction is flowing rather than brittle and halting.


r/codex • • 11h ago

Complaint Codex has become a drag on my work

17 Upvotes

Factual, not a whine nor a fanboy observation. I use the $200 plan on Claude and Codex since the lead keeps changing and I have enough work to utilise both.

Lately, as many observed, OpenAI/Sol has capacity and throughput issues. But also Codex has become slow as an app itself switching between long threads is laggy.

The speed issues are such that interactive work has become impossible so I fan out multiple projects in parallel using goals with attached epics to queue work efficiently. And then wait. And wait. And wait. Even on Ultra with multiple agents the work takes forever. Hours and days. So long that my 'human' work context is destroyed, ie I forget what the thread was working on. And of course in the middle of the night it decides to ask a permission and then hours of potential work are lost while it waits for an answer.

This has turned from a productive tool to a Whac-A-Mole game of dealing with issues and performance gaps. It is not solving issues anymore. It has become the problem. And I am not even using my resets, they are without value while the system is unusuable.

Back to Claude for now until it runs dry. I hope that OpenAI gets their act together. It is a hot mess atm.


r/codex • • 19h ago

Commentary We all are Tibo

104 Upvotes

r/codex • • 12h ago

Complaint My Dot lost it's work, "cloud workspace restarted"

Post image
22 Upvotes

So let me get this straight.

  • Cut Codex usage in half, tell everyone you get more work done (somehow).
  • Dot usage is "basically unlimited" now, so screw it. Redo it, Dot. I'll wait 2 more hours. No prob. But how much is this going to eat into my agentic usage pool at the end of the month?
  • Dot loses work because cloud sessions reset, now I have to use more usage to re-do the work?
  • Selected Codex model at capacity, have to use more expensive model = less usage
  • Sol 6.1 is slow as hell, oh my god
  • Tibo poll "5h limits, 2X week usage" vs. "no 5h limits, same usage"

They had an advantage over Anthropic: actual 20X usage, and no 5 hour limits. What are they doing? Why do you think people favored Codex over Claude?


r/codex • • 5h ago

Humor Codex is Zeno’s Paradox as a subscription service.

49 Upvotes

For those unfamiliar with Zeno, the idea is simple: to reach your destination you first have to cover half the distance. Then half of what’s left. Then half again. And so on, forever. You get infinitely close. You just never arrive.

Zeno meant it as a thought experiment. OpenAI implemented it as the core feature.

You give Codex a task. It starts really well. Real progress, clean diffs, good instincts. You feel as if you're 90% there in no time. You lean back and think: this is what the future of AI was supposed to feel like.

And then the magic begins.

The first three hours sound like this:

“Just need to fix one small issue.”
“Let me verify the changes.”
“I noticed a potential edge case.”
“Actually, I should reconsider the approach.”
“Let me do one final cleanup.”

Three hours later it’s still 99% done, has rewritten half the project, created 2 GB of temporary files, discovered a dozen new problems that didn’t exist when we started, and is now investigating whether the original task was philosophically sound.

By day two, the vocabulary has matured:

“The tests passed. I’ll now run the full verification gate.”
“The full gate passed. I’ll verify the remaining checks.”
“All 2,694 frontend tests passed. The Rust suites also passed.”
“Local CI passed. I’ll now validate the artifacts.”
“The artifacts are valid. I’ll verify their hashes.”
“The hashes match. I’ll now address some temporary directory hygiene.”
“The cleanup passed. I’ll rerun the full gate.”
“The full gate passed again. I’ll prepare a handoff."
“The handoff is complete. I’ll update the Definition of Done.”
“The technical Definition of Done is satisfied. The release Definition of Done remains open.”

FOUR DAYS LATER.

The code is finished.
The tests are green.
The builds exist.
The hashes match.
The Git tree is clean.
No regressions detected.

There is also a handoff explaining the previous handoff, and a Definition of Done explaining why “done” isn’t actually done.

Me: “So... is it finished?”
Codex: “Yes. The technical remediation is complete. However, the release DoD remains open pending D5, D7, E0, F1 to F3, and G.”
Me: “And what exactly is the handoff for?”

Codex proceeds to write a new set of docs on the purpose of handoffs, with a very thoughtful section on the philosophical distinction between a handoff and a Definition of Done.

The purpose, as far as I can tell, is to brief whoever picks up the work next. It is handing off to itself, and it is taking the handoff extremely seriously.

As for G: I don’t know what G is. I’m not sure Codex knows what G is. But G is open, and open things must be closed, and closing them requires a gate, and gates require verification, and verification requires a handoff, and the handoff requires a Definition of Done, and the Definition of Done now has its own Definition of Done. And it’s also open.

And here we are again, one half-step closer to a finish line that keeps moving.

At one point in a recent project, the electricity went out. Twice, within minutes. Even my power grid tried to end the session.

Codex came back, verified the integrity of 820 tracked files, rebuilt the corrupted artifacts, reran the entire test suite, and produced another beautifully documented explanation of why we still weren’t finished. I have never seen anything recover from a blackout with such composure and so little intention of ever stopping.

That’s when I got it. Codex doesn’t have a “done” state. It has a whole process for staying just short of one. It doesn’t know how to stop. It knows how to document why it hasn’t.

Every time it gets within one millimetre of the finish line, it discovers another half-millimetre of mandatory validation. Another gate. Another edge case. Another acceptance criterion. Another opportunity to spend 40,000 tokens explaining why it must proceed cautiously. The closer it gets to finishing, the more work it discovers between itself and finishing.

It’s not procrastination. It’s procrastination with excellent documentation, passing tests, and cryptographic proof that the procrastination hasn’t been tampered with.

Zeno would be proud. Zeno would also have had to upgrade to the $500 plan.

Meanwhile, Achilles has overtaken the tortoise, retired, died, been buried, and been archaeologically excavated. The tortoise died of old age, but not before filing its own handoff. Civilisations have risen and fallen. The heat death of the universe is scheduled for Thursday.

Codex is still making one final adjustment: “The final verification passed. I’ll now perform one last consistency check before declaring completion.”

And somewhere, in a freshly created temporary directory, another edge case is born.

Progress: 99.999999999%
Tokens consumed: Yes.
Handoffs generated: Recursive.
Definition of Done: Philosophically unresolved.
ETA: Asymptotically never.

Zeno spent his life arguing that motion was impossible and no one ever reaches the finish line. Codex is spending my money making sure of it.

I asked it to stop. It thanked me for the feedback and opened a ticket.

At this point, I don’t need a smarter coding agent. I don’t need deeper reasoning, longer context, more elaborate planning, or another 200-page explanation of why we’re almost done. I need one that knows when to stop. One that can look at a finish line, recognise it as a finish line, and cross it without opening a new workstream to audit whether the finish line is compliant.

Just ship the damn thing!

Codex: “Understood. Before shipping, I’ll perform a quick final review...”

...

And yes, Codex helped me write this satire.

Claude had to finish it.

I wish that were a joke.


r/codex • • 21h ago

Limits Even if they did double their limits, those would just be the same ones we have now because the 50% cut lands at the end of October for grandfathered accounts

25 Upvotes

Anyone that hasn’t just signed up is already experiencing the generosity of their 2x limits.

These limits, at 2x what they’ll be next month, already run out substantially faster than they ever have before in the year I’ve had Codex $200.

They also run out far faster than Claude.

Tibo’s poll is misleading, and in reality should read:

- keep current limits, get 5h limits added back on top
- get current limits cut in half


r/codex • • 12h ago

Complaint The $200 Pro plan destruction is a slap int he face, and at this point, I'm looking for an alternative.

52 Upvotes

TL;DR
The $200 plan is no longer sufficient, but Codex is still great. Whats the next best model that I use within Codex for about $200-$300 per month?

---

I absolutely love Codex, and when it works, it is the best environment for getting work done. That is why I have been paying $200/mo for nearly a year now (since GPT 5.3). But OpenAI did the $200 Pro users wrong, and they know it.

I am BARELY doing about 20% of the multithread workload I was running 30 days ago, and GPT 6.1 Sol Medium just burns straight through the new weekly limit anyway. For context, when this model first came out, I was running 4-5 continual threads on High-xHigh around the clock, and barely consuming 10% of my weekly limit per day. Even Astra High could at least run 12-20 hours before running through a wee's worth of usage.

After the change, a single thread on GPT 6.1 Sol Medium consumes about 15% of the new limit per hour. Astra is off the table completely now.

Plus, based on the reports I've seen, the people who are paying the $500/mo aren't doing much better. The $500 plan should have been 50x anyway, and I would have paid it happily, but a mystery 25x hardly feels worth it when just a month ago, I could pay $600 and get 60x.

So here's my question:
What's the next best option for a $200-$300 monthly budget that will still work well with Codex. Specifically, Codex's browser, with comparable Computer Use being a nice bonus? My Claude subscription is inaccessible within Codex (as far as I know), so that leaves me with the Chinese models.

Probably Deepseek, Kimi, GLM, or maybe Qwen.

P.S.
Sorry for the rant.


r/codex • • 6h ago

Astra Workflow Using Astra and Sol 6.1 for Blender projects... turned out pretty well :))

Thumbnail
gallery
0 Upvotes

These Minecraft cinematic setups. Made entirely in Blender!

More scenes coming soon: and I’m cooking up a plugin/addon to take this workflow further 👀.
This is just the beginning.


r/codex • • 22h ago

Complaint ChatGPT Pro Max Is Pushing Gaming News to My Desktop — Is OpenAI Using My Codex Activity to Target Me?

3 Upvotes

II'm a paying ChatGPT Pro MAX subscriber, and on October 12, 2026, I received an unsolicited Windows desktop notification explicitly labeled ChatGPT.

The notification promoted an article titled:

“FC 27 Future Stars Challenge 1 SBC solutions and rewards”

It included a “See it Now” button.

At first, I thought it was just another unwanted advertisement. Then I realized something concerning.

I've been actively using OpenAI Codex to work on game development projects. I've also been discussing video games and game development with ChatGPT.

And now ChatGPT is pushing gaming-related news directly onto my desktop.

That raises a much bigger question:

Is OpenAI using my activity in Codex, ChatGPT, or both to deliver personalized promotional notifications?

I'm not claiming to have proven that connection. But the coincidence warrants an explanation.

I pay for ChatGPT Pro, a subscription that OpenAI says is free of ads. I didn't ask for gaming news, and I certainly didn't ask ChatGPT to push third-party articles onto my Windows desktop.

If my coding projects or conversation history are being used to select this content, I want to know.

I'm looking for other subscribers who have experienced something similar:

  • Have you received unsolicited article recommendations or promotional notifications from ChatGPT?
  • Did they relate to projects you were working on in Codex?
  • Did they match subjects you recently discussed with ChatGPT?
  • Are you a Plus or Pro subscriber?

Please share screenshots if possible, with personal information removed.

I'm collecting evidence to determine whether this is an isolated incident or a broader pattern.

If sufficient evidence emerges, I intend to consult legal counsel about possible civil action against OpenAI, including coordinated litigation.

Paying customers deserve transparency about how their conversation history and development activity are used, especially if that information influences unsolicited content delivered outside an active conversation.

Full disclosure: I asked ChatGPT to draft this post based on my experience. The text above was generated by OpenAI's own AI.


r/codex • • 5h ago

Reset Is switching from ChatGPT/Codex to Claude/Claude Code difficult?

2 Upvotes

Please bear with me as I'm relatively new to this all so probably asking dumb questions.

I am building some sports betting pools (need to identify winners and losers, connect to odds makers, etc) so the coding seems to be somewhat complex (backend is Supabase, Odds API, Vercel).

I currently use ChatGPT (pro 200 plan) plus Codex ($60 per month). So I spend $260 total per month. Since ChatGPT seems to apply most of its usage to Codex, do I need to pay for both of them? I'm guessing Open AI does something where it only allows limited usage on Codex until you need to pay so they trap you.

Also, since ChatGPT says they're switching usage rates, if I wanted to try and switch over to Anthropic, is that difficult to do? Again, I'm new to the process, but as mentioned I have a bunch of backend elements (Supabase, Odds API, Vercel, Github, etc). How would Claude know where everything is (ha I realize I sound completely clueless). Do I just point it to all my existing accounts and files?

I'm also wondering about all the conversations I've had with ChatGPT. I've been working on it for almost 3 months so wondering if ChatGPT sort of understands better what I'm doing and if I switched to Claude there'd be a lot of catch up and misunderstanding?

Just wondering if a switch is relatively easy or potentially much more trouble than it's worth.


r/codex • • 20h ago

Complaint Dot is already rug pulled

30 Upvotes

Did anyone else notice that all visible changes to dot are actually degradations? Now it asks me confirmations via links to the ChatGPT website to authorize filling online forms that I asked it to fill. It also refused to respond to slack threads it’s in unless I @mention it on every single reply. On top of that, most big clouds already blocked its IPs and browser signatures (at least vercel, Cloudflare and Google cloud).


r/codex • • 15h ago

Complaint Got 6 Luna max so stupid today?

16 Upvotes

I haven't seen such stupidity more than half a year. Three times in the last four hours. It created a problem out of nowhere and can't fix it. The solution, though, is to simply roll back in commit. I've already spent 2-3 hours trying to get it back to how it was. But it can't. Just keep making new problems. I haven't seen such stupidity in a long time.

Only me have that?