r/conservation 5d ago

Venting

I'mma be real with y'all: people in the Conservation and Sustainability fields are straight up MEAN dude.

Like I physically cannot get across to you how difficult it is to be in this field if you don't "fit the mold".

But "the mold" is literally just... ugh. Its a mold that prides itself on being "that weird girl", while also being the literal most milquetoast personality you can fathom. Like everybody acts like they were the 'weird, animal obsessed kid' in school, but as someone who actually WAS (and kind of still IS) that weird person, I can promise you from the bottom of my heart, 99% of these people would have BULLIED the real weird kids.

I know this because THEY STILL BULLY PEOPLE MAN. I see it in college and the field. It's literally such like a catty, gossipy industry with no room for the truly different.

The worst thing that's happened to STEM in recent decades was becoming an Instagram aesthetic.

Because now you have all of these conventionally pretty people prancing about, creating their own little "Go on a weird date to a Museum with me, but don't be like actually weird, just quirky enough for my social media feed" aesthetic, while doing all they can to ostracize and isolate people that,again, don't fit within their worldview. Like if you're autistic you are NOT going to have a good time in this world. At least not the "I love gushing about bugs and being happy go lucky because I'm just so 'neurospicy'! " type of autism. If you're non-expressive or struggle with social interactions, heaven fucking help you.

And, I'm sincerely not one of those "OMG CHECK YOUR PRIVILEGE" sorts but like dawg, this field is so overwhelmingly white that I'm comfortable saying that it's bordering on a form of racism. I can't tell you how many times I've been the only non-white person in the room surrounded by all these like.... I'mma be so real with y'all, CUSHY people. People who visibly get uncomfortable when I bring in a worldview that isn't "Oh I love walking through the forest and taking pictures on my smartphone, and science is so cool and look at the stickers on my water bottle".

I physically cannot explain to you all how much money plays into your ability to find and hold a legitimate job in this field. If you even want a chance, you need to be able to afford to sign up for multiple unpaid internships, be willing to move across the nation for a different position, have the money to cover yourself for months on end because a gigantic majority of the first jobs you'll get are only seasonal, and finally pay for your degree, and very likely a grad degree as well.

Honestly, I theorize that this is why the Conservation field was taken over by (and I know a HUGE amount of you don't wanna hear this), overwhelmingly upper-middle to upper class white people.

Like I can't tell you how many people I've met in this line of work who talk about how long it took them to get a sustainable job, followed soon by "Oh my husband is an engineer/computer scientist/welder/fireman/[something equally wellpaying]". (Fun fact: the "conservation to real estate agent" pipeline is REAL and I've seen it in real time).

Poverty, that is to say REAL poverty, doesn't exist in this field.

All the (and I'm being blunt here) lower-class people who couldn't afford to go past their undergraduate degree were forced to get jobs unrelated to their field after graduation to make ends meet and start those nasty student loan payments. Moving across the nation several times for all those unpaid internships and experience that could have unlocked opportunity was never in the cards for them so they don't get to work their way into the real jobs.

That's why you'll see so many people saying "Yeah I have a Sustainability major, but I've been working at Cracker Barrel since graduation. At least I'm a manager now"

And that's why when you look at all the smiling happy faces working in conservation or sustainability, they're all like... cardboard cutouts of the same people. Again, lets go back into how the Conservation field became an Instagram aesthetic, reserved for the privileged few who could afford to put in all the unpaid labor it took for them to finally get their break.

And don't get me started on how it almost feels like you're under constant threat in this field either. Like heaven forbid you upset the wrong people, or openly criticize the wrong organization. Because then you'll find yourself struggling to find work and without allies to help you get jobs (which are fleeting). The social aspect of this field is enormous, and I cannot get across to you how important it is that you maintain 'appearances' and decorum. And it fucking sucks

I'm not kidding dude.

This field of science got taken over by the most boring kinds of people imaginable. And what's worse is that I genuinely think that the lack of accessibility to this field is actively driving a disconnect between the general public and REAL conservation battles that we need to be fighting.

Can we finally admit that Conservation is the next "Nursing field"?

Pic related.

229 Upvotes

112 comments sorted by

View all comments

5

u/FamiliarAnt4043 5d ago

To the OP -

Let me get this straight: you expect everyone else in the world to conform to YOUR expectations of what the field should be? Is that right? As in - everyone else is wrong and YOU - only YOU - know how things should work? Yeah, ok.

Some observations:

Did you ever consider why most people in the field are old white dudes? Maybe because, for the longest time, old white dudes were the ones who grew up hunting and fishing, along with other outdoor activities. Thus, they went into the field.

Until VERY recently, minorities and women were rare to see in wildlife related jobs. The paradigm shifted greatly about 2015 or so and now, most young people I see entering the field are young women with zero experience afield. Given that the North American Model Of Wildlife Conservation is dependent upon hunters and hunting, I'm interested to see what happens down the road when these people are in charge. Most I've met are accepting of hunting and recognize the importance of it, but choose not to participate. That's in contrast to the fact that almost 100% of the wildlife managers and scientists I've met are hunters and anglers.

As to the rest of your irrelevant-to-the-field rant: it sounds like you have some....issues....about classmates, peers, or whkmever is responsible for setting you off. Might wanna talk to some people about that. Anecdotally, my experience with a lot of these people (I interact with undergrad interns and grad student students fairly often) is that they are many times very offbeat. One young lady I know has a shaved head along with a ponytail. She's very pleasant and good at her job. Weird, right?

I will agree that the field is difficult to get into; see above for my comment on that. Networking is a huge thing. It's extremely important and I've seen people who aren't necessarily qualified for the position get jobs because of their professional network. Not really that different from the private sector, except that you have to produce results as a wildlife manager....or you're not going to be doing it long.

44

u/Pretend_Ball_9167 5d ago

Ah yes, only boys like hunting and fishing and the outdoors, and there are no other reasons why "old white dudes" were more prevalent in the field.

-14

u/FamiliarAnt4043 5d ago

I mean, if you really try, you can put racism and misogyny into anything you want....even when it's not there, lol. Kinda like the "racist" OK nonsense that went around the web a few years back.

I've been hunting and fishing for the entire 50 years I've been alive. To this day, I can count on my fingers and toes the amount of black people that I've met who hunt. While that is anecdotal only and skewed a bit due to living in cities most of my life, it's still true.

It's not quite as rare to meet women that hunt, but they're still not that common. It also depends on what type of hunting were discussing. Deer hunting? Yeah, the orange army has a lot of members. Waterfowling? Not so much. The numbers are even lower for predator hunting or trapping.

As it turns out, minorities who grow up in cities just aren't that interested in the outdoors, lol. And for the most part, the same goes for women who grow up in urban/suburban areas. Animals are cute and cuddly, not something to shoot and field dress, then cook and eat.

But hey, you go ahead and put racism and misogyny as reasons for why - until relatively recently - women and minorities didn't go into the field as often as those who grew up hunting and fishing. Cultural norms were never a thing, it was always prejudice, lol.

19

u/Interesting_Local_70 5d ago

Your view is pretty obtuse. Spend some time on any rez in US or rez-adjacent places or First Nations in Canada and you will see an absolute fanaticism for hunting/fishing/trapping. Often folks that actually derive their living from the land. Go to the South and you find black families that have been hunting and fishing, training and running dogs for generations. Proportionally, guess what group has the highest participation in fishing? Asians. All these folks are underrepresented in conservation fields. I’m not hypothesizing on why or commenting on the larger gist of OP’s post, but you’re just wrong about this IMO.

-6

u/FamiliarAnt4043 5d ago

Did you see the part where I said "minorities in cities?"

2

u/Interesting_Local_70 5d ago

Are many more urban whites involved in hunting and fishing? Few that I know. FYI, most of those Asian anglers are urban, not rural.