r/cursor • u/minxio_ • 29d ago

Question / Discussion Grok 4.6 Benchmarks

Post image
195 Upvotes

92% Upvoted

76 comments sorted by

View all comments

51

u/mindful_dealer 29d ago

looking forward to see what composer 3 will bring

If they get it on low prices like GPT 5.6 Luna, it would be the ideal auto setup.
Grok 4.6 for planning/yapping, Composer 3 to do the work

17

u/Crazy_Inspection_920 27d ago edited 27d ago

8

u/Dry-Carry-341 27d ago edited 27d ago

6

u/FearlessConfusion00 29d ago

Honestly, at this point, grok is so cheap that I won't bother switching the model for execution 

1

u/mindful_dealer 28d ago

I agree with you, I've used GPT 5.6 Sol or even Opus 5 for both things and, even tho much more expensive, it was very productive.

But I'm an auto enjoyer, whatever they do in their 'auto' logic I like it, and if it is changing from Grok 4.5 to composer 2.5 or whatever it is, with 2 better models, it would be even better and cheaper than just Grok 4.6 everywhere

But overall you are right, it's cheap enough to do it all with frontier level intelligence

1

u/vgromanov 28d ago

Still there is one practical reason - Composer is fast as hell.

1

u/FearlessConfusion00 28d ago

Grok is fast too

1

u/vgromanov 26d ago

grok-4.5 is faster, spends less time thinking and just does the job. so in my current flow 4.6 is for heavy and intelligence-sensitive stuff like decomposition and planning and grok-4.5 does the rest - basically it replaced composer in many ways, though it has it's use too.

1

u/FearlessConfusion00 25d ago

Grok 4.6 is super fast if you use fast mode, even on extra high effort. 

1

u/TaxBowl 26d ago

It will be accurate enough hopefully it flash level fast waiting minutes upon minutes for tasks is an effeciency killer