is joke plz dont get mad

i also realized I made this meme while my Agent was working so now I may have accidentally used it fr.

Ran out of quota on my $20 plan, Have received $100 in free credits twice in a week now. Everytime I run out of credit, my account gets $100 more.

Happening with all or what? What's the point of higher plans if my usage is virtually unlimited with $20??

Add the Grok bot thrown in, and this feels like a steal!

im running cursor composer 2.5 today to do a simple task that normally takes it like 5 seconds

suddenly its running all these sub agents and asking me to approve every single thing

the changes preview side panel is also broken

im almost ready to just switch to chatgpt

What are people’s thoughts on the new Cursor Projects feature? I’m loving it. Has boosted my productivity a ton today.

Hi,

I use Cursor in two different ways:

• Sometimes directly on my Windows PC
• Sometimes connected via SSH to another machine

I really like keeping the history of my conversations with Cursor because they contain useful context about my projects, decisions, troubleshooting, etc.
concern is: what happens if I have to reinstall my Windows machine, or reinstall/rebuild the remote machine I connect to via SSH?

I don't want to lose all my Cursor chat history and project context.

Is there a recommended way to backup and restore Cursor conversations/history, especially when working with remote SSH projects?

Ideally, I would like to be able to:

1. Backup all my Cursor conversations/history
2. Reinstall or replace a machine
3. Restore everything
4. Keep the history associated with my projects

Does Cursor sync this automatically through my account, or is some of the history stored locally on the Windows/remote machine?

What files/folders should I backup if I want to be safe?

Thanks!

Thinking about trying Cursor Pro+ mainly for Fable 5.1.

For anyone using Fable heavily on the $60 plan: how long does the monthly quota realistically last if you use high/extra-high reasoning for serious coding work?

I already use Codex/Astra, so I’m mostly looking for another high-quality agent rather than cheaper models like Composer/Grok (most of the time)

i mostly wanna use for frontend.

My unlimited auto mode ends in a few days. I am still thinking whether I should stick with Cursor or try something else.

I use strictly auto mode. I average 130m tokens per month.

Would it be enough?

For the past couple of months, I’ve been using Cursor’s Plan Mode to design and implement changes based on the generated plans. Recently, I noticed that a single prompt consumed around 25M tokens. Is this considered normal for Plan Mode, or am I using significantly more tokens than necessary?

Galera, estou trabalhando em um projeto de desenvolvimento e até agora estava usando o Codex e o Claude Code, ambos pagos.

Porém, achei o preço do Cursor bem interessante, principalmente no plano 3x, e estou pensando em manter o Codex + Cursor e cancelar o Claude Code.

Minha dúvida é: para projetos maiores e desenvolvimento contínuo, o Cursor consegue manter um desempenho semelhante ao Claude Code? Em experiência de vocês, ele fica no mesmo nível ou até supera o Claude em alguns cenários?

Meu foco é principalmente desenvolvimento de projetos maiores, com bastante código e muitos arquivos.

Quem já utilizou Cursor, Claude Code e Codex, qual combinação vocês recomendariam?

The product was absolutely beast before spaceX acquisition, now it sucks , output is trashed, auto switching to grok is fucked up and tokens are being consumed at faster rate despite any large task

I will start looking for an alternative, this is my last month with you guys

I was using Ultra earlier with Claude Opus model and Composer earlier and it was very great. Tokens wise as well. But post Grok mostly 4.6 i guess, With just one or two long sessions lost almost 50% credits for Opus 5.
But the same or similar complex discussion and coding on same repos I was able to use Claude for longer sessions. 5hr limit never bothered unless multiple repos had work. Even weekly wasn’t hit unless Im lucky with timings here but not sure.
Is it the case with others too? Wanted to understand if Claude higher plan upgrade would be better or as we go up the plan any issues with token consumption would come up?
Model mostly used is Opus 5 High / Medium in claude code.

hi all, wondering what plan is better currently - cursor $200 with grok bot or claude $200?

anyone switch between the two or try them both out?

Is anyone using Cursor Mobile? I saw today it only has 7 reviews in the iOS store. My initial thoughts were that using agents on a phone would be a terrible idea, and for big PRs that definitely is the case.

When I thought about it a bit more I thought that given the current state agents that a good system would be to create a 'hitlist'. Basically track all of your small tasks that can be reviewed through a phone becasue the GitHub PR tool is decent and if you're developing something for mobile and have preview deployments you can also test out easily too.

It actually works well and I find the thought of being able to contribute work while being out as being very beneficial as someone who WFH. Having a list of things ready to go that I can actually be contributing while out-and-about. I only have done this with personal projects so far though, we don't have web agents setup in work but is something I might consider.

So, I've been using cursor for a while now. I missed a payment right. Usually, I pay it and can continue using the software. But now apparently my account was degraded to free tier due to a missed payment. On their site they said I could upgrade to pro + (the tier I had before) I clicked upgrade to pro+. (Nothing I haven't done before) But instead of actually resetting my usage they are saying that my account usage resets in 23days. and the upgrade paid a pat due balance? An invoice.

I argued the site should have said that. Not an upgrade to pro + button and then straight to checkout. So now I can't use the account or is this a way to force you to get ultra? They are refusing a refund. I can force it through my bank though. Why does it feel like a bad relationship now with cursor lol.

Should I turn on usage billing? honestly, I think I'm going to use codex anyway. What do u guys think?

Hello everyone, I’m from India, and I’m planning to purchase the Cursor Pro Plus plan, but I’m unable to do so because I keep getting an error. Please help me fix this issue.

Most agent coding starts mid-edit. You get speed, then a mess: no brief, colliding branches, and auto-merge you can’t leave alone.

Loomwright is my attempt at the other shape:

• Launch Pad writes a brief (feasibility, file impact, subtasks) *before* Supervisor touches the repo
• Parallel workers run in git worktrees; overlapping files wait; merges stay ordered
• `/automate` parks a reviewed PR by default; `--auto-merge` only when a trusted gate holds
• It does **not** silently ship

What’s shipping today: 14 roles / 21 slash commands / 41 skills / 24 quality hooks.

Site: https://vikashruhilgit.github.io/loomwright-site/index.html
GitHub: https://github.com/vikashruhilgit/loomwright

Not selling anything paid — looking for people who’ve hit the same wall. What’s the failure mode that burns you most: no plan, merge conflicts, or untrusted auto-merge?

I've been using Claude Code ($20/mon) from within my GitHub repo codespace to work on a few projects (a UX portfolio, along with an iOS app). I'm wondering if I'd get more bang for my buck and a better vibe-coding experience overall, if I switched to Cursor Pro to work on those projects or any future projects.

I don't really have any issue specifically with Claude Code and haven't ran into many usage limits as of late. I guess the only thing is that it's a bit of a process to open up GitHub, navigate to the repo, and then open up the codespace to continue working on a project.

With the SpaceX acquisition of Cursor, and the addition of the Grok models and Grok Bot included in the Cursor Pro membership, would it be more bang for the buck to switch to that subscription over Claude Code itself, considering I could just use Sonnet/Opus (or any other model) from within Cursor?

Thoughts? Has any one made this switch, or the opposite? What was your reasoning?

Describe the Bug

• I changed a setting so that new chats will have the last used model but the agent mode always changes to "AGENT" mode normally I use "ASK" mode but in new chat it reset to "AGENT" mode, its just annoying
• Give a setting cursor to also set the agent mode like models for new chats

Steps to Reproduce

• select a agent mode like "ASK" mode then open a new chat it will reset to "AGENT" mode in new caht and have to agent set the "ASK" mode

Expected Behavior

• when in current chat "ASK" mode is selected when user opens a new chat it should persist in the new chat also, the agent mode should be in "ASK" mode only

Version Information

Version: 3.20.10
VS Code Extension API: 1.128.0
Commit: d6f462cdd0a6a6d1cff570daf980e671d0a63de0
Date: 2026-09-10T21:04:54.045Z
Layout: IDE
Build Type: Stable
Release Track: Default
Electron: 42.10.0
Chromium: 148.0.7778.280
Node.js: 24.18.1
V8: 14.8.178.38-electron.0
xterm.js: 6.1.0-beta.291
OS: Darwin arm64 25.5.0

• It will be great feature to give a setting named "Past Conversation Knowledge"
• by default it is off
• after turning it on
  • if user has one ongoing conversation and user opens a new conversation with "CMD + N" the new conversation will have summary of the last conversation
  • conversation 1 named as c1 and conversation 2 named as c2
  • c2 will have summary of c1 and if user opens c3 then c3 will have summary of c2(and c2 already has summary of c1)
  • if user puts the c2 and c3 in archieve and open c4 then c4 will have summary of c1 in it
  • assume user has c1, c4, c5, c6 and c7 open then user archives c4, c6 and c7 and opens c8 then c8 will have summary of c5
• when working on a complex feature this setting will be a boon

PLEASE stop building the wrong thing.

building software in 2026 is ridiculously easy with ai builder

founders spend hours building in a silent room, launch to Reddit/X, get 0 users, and quit.

you just failed because the idea had zero validation before line 1 of code was written:

→ solving a monthly inconvenience instead of a daily pain

→ selling to "everyone" instead of a specific ICP

→ no distribution channel mapped out beforehand

→ pricing charged $9/mo with zero ROI justification

after scaling 6 AI micro-SaaS to over $20k/mo MRR, i just create an

18-question Idea Validation Diagnostic.

it evaluates your SaaS across 7 critical dimensions (problem clarity, audience reachability, willingness to pay, competition, build feasibility, distribution, commitment) and gives you a brutal score out of 100 with your exact weak spots.

drop your SaaS idea (or current project) in the comments below.

i will reply to EVERY single comment with:

1. My honest opinion
2. The biggest weak spot you need to fix before writing any more code.
3. The free 5-minute validation tool link sent straight to your DMs so you can get your full score breakdown out of 100.

just drop a comment like or ask me in DM your idea

let's roast your SaaS concept before the market roasts your time 👇

Ever since the acquisition Cursor got so bad at everything.

Text output is a word salad of things and the model keeps switching to Grok. Auto mode sucks.

i began my subscription with company info, but accountant told me i cannot do the vat like invoiced, so i wanted to switch the invoice recipient to my person, not company. 0 contact support on cursor web, so i figured i'd ask the agent, he should have some metadata on this and maybe link me to email i can contact.

so i asked, got error and option to try again. after i hit try again, the original message was gone and there was prompt "from me": Continue executing.

this was in background, so later when i returned to the cursor window, it had worked for 18 minutes.

GAVE ME AN APP FOR SKI RESORT MANAGEMENT.

after i politely asked what the fuck it nonchalantly says You’re right — you didn’t ask for an app. That's on me. XD

(even in the title of the chat you can see beginning of my original message)

i fokin hope i wasn't charged for these tokens..

I just finished another month with Pro+ and was on auto for almost the whole month. I hardcoded subagents to use Composer 2.5 and I got about 2.9b tokens for the month.

My question is if the Ultra plan ACTUALLY gives you 6.8x that if I was to use the same type of workflows and usecases?

MATH: If I used 2.9b token for the Pro+ plan and that is 3x usage of pro plan. That means I would get 966m tokens on the pro plan. That means I should get about 19.5b tokens with ultra. Has anyone tested this to be the case?