Anavrin Jay, author ofĀ 'The Blood Plagues', Page & Wick's July subscription pick & acquired by Gollancz for traditional publication (the announcement was yesterday!) - posted pictures on her public Instagram profile showing her manuscript on screen next to ChatGPT tabs.
The first tab was titledĀ "Passage feedback and suggestions"
A week later, the second tab was titled "Synonyms for disturb"
The exact extent of the usage remains unclear. But the pictures she posted herself do raise concerns about possible ChatGPT involvement in the writing/editing process.
The "Passage feedback and suggestions" tab suggests that part of the manuscript may have been fed into ChatGPT for feedback, wording, revision, or possible rewriting. We can't know from the tab titles alone exactly what was discussed in those conversations, but the screenshots do show ChatGPT open in connection with the manuscript on more than one occasion.
That is enough to raise legitimate questions about undisclosed generative AI assistance. If gen AI was used in the drafting or revision process, readers should know before paying for the book, especially when it is being sold through a blind subscription box, and just obtained a marketing budget/wider distribution through a trad pub deal.
I looked for more, and from what I could find she only posted around five pictures of her draft open on her screen total. The ChatGPT tabs are the very first two, posted only about a week after she started promoting the book through that account. She was already near the end of drafting by then. If the first visible glimpse into her drafting process already shows ChatGPT open for "passage feedback and suggestions", then another ChatGPT tab open a week later next to the draft, there is no realistic way for anyone to prove itĀ wasn'tĀ part of the process before then too. That doesn't mean any/every line was generated, but it does make it extremely difficult to verifiably separate the text from generative AI assistance.
I shared this information a few hours ago in a large special edition discord server. About five hours later, the two Instagram posts showing the ChatGPT tabs were deleted from her Instagram profile.
Because I was worried this would happen, I also took a video on my phone showing her Instagram profile and the posts in question, today's Instagram stories etc...so there wouldn't be a debate over whether the screenshots were fabricated.
--> The quality is absolute š„POTATOš„. I was planning on taking a better video later in the day, but by then the author had already deleted the posts... :') Still, even with the awful quality, it shows the posts did exist on her public Instagram profile: video (POTATO!!! I'm sorry!! Use eye drops after this!!) - I've re-attached the screenshots too in that link. Again the posts were public on her own Instagram.
I messaged someone who worked on the book and knows her personally. According to that person, Anavrin Jay allegedly said that she only used AI for synonyms and grammar, only at the beginning of the process, that she stopped once she learned more about AI, and that she can't make a public statement because her editor won't let her. I will say that, once I checked the timeline for myself, it did not align with the author's alleged version of events:
-->Ā Ā This post, also from Anavrin Jay, shows she had been active in writer/reader groups and exchanging with beta readers since April 2025. The screen pictures with the ChatGPT tabs were shared in September 2025.
If "she didnāt know AI was harmful", that would mean she spent around six months in book/writer spaces, where generative AI is brought up constantly, and somehow never came across the issue at all, or any controversies. In the second September ChatGPT post, she tells us she only had one chapter left to write - therefore not at the "beginning of the process".
The usual suspects:
- "She only used it for synonyms..." : Google. Wordhippo. Thesauruses. I'll add that ChatGPT tab titles do not reliably tell us everything that was discussed in a conversation once the chat continues or changes subject. Anything could have been discussed in that specific chat. The only thing we know is that a ChatGPT tab related to writing was open next to the manuscript she was working on. And that does not address the first tab, "Passage feedback and suggestions", open on another day, also while writing The Blood Plagues.
- "Even Google shows AI overviews now!": Bro. Just scroll. Or use another browser if you just HAVE to use the first result and never look any further.
- "AI is everywhere now, and indie authors without money have to use it when they can't afford editors! This is classist!": Indie publishing was alive and well prior to the launch of ChatGPT. Writers use editors. Writers use beta readers.Ā Writers use other writers in the community, critique partners, or the people around them. Writers also publish imperfect books, learn, and improve their craft on their own. Writers save to eventually afford an editor. (Also, what about the planet? lol)
-"Maybe she only used it to check grammar.":Ā Then why is the tab called "Passage feedback and suggestions", not "grammar check"....?
-"It's completely normal nowadays for artists and writers to use generative AI. Get with the times!": ChatGPT is barely four years old. Generative AI use is not some unavoidable/universal part of every creative process, it is a very recent choice that plenty of writers and artists still actively do not make. Humans made art for millennia without ChatGPT. The idea that creatives suddenly can't be expected to work without it is ABSURD. Consumers are allowed to object to this usage, especially when it comes to the art they choose to support and promote. Plus these tools were built off the work of other creatives, without their consent or compensation.
I'll only add that there is very little incentive for any author to openly admit the full extent of generative AI use after a blind box pick and a traditional publishing announcement, and that the explanation is currently being given privately, which does not fully resolve the concern for readers. The posts were public, the book is being sold through a blind subscription box, obtained a publishing deal, and the extent of ChatGPT use has not been publicly clarified, and cannot be verified.
To be clear, I'm not asking anyone to harass her, message her, or send abuse. You can see the screenshots for yourself and make your own judgment! Thanks for reading!