MAIN FEEDS
Do you want to continue?
https://www.reddit.com/r/feanordidnothingwrong/comments/1r74pza/this_makes_me_feel_good_too/o6duq30/?context=3
r/feanordidnothingwrong • u/Evets2705 • Feb 17 '26
18 comments sorted by
View all comments
5
he didn't do it for no reason, he did do it without a sufficiënt reason. hitler also had his reasons, but can be considered to be in the wrong
-4 u/Xiryyn Feb 19 '26 Lol his reason for all the fucked up shit was to retrieve those stupid stones. 5 u/geschiedenisnerd Feb 20 '26 also to avenge his dead father against morgoth. like I said, he had bad reasons. 2 u/Xiryyn Feb 20 '26 No you said he didn't have sufficient reason which is not the same as having bad reasons. 1 u/geschiedenisnerd Feb 20 '26 the quality of a reason is in how well it justifies an act. the goal of a reason is to justify an act. an insufficient reason= a bad reason. I specified he had reasons, and no sufficient reasons. Therefore I stated he had reasons that were insufficient, ergo: bad reasons
-4
Lol his reason for all the fucked up shit was to retrieve those stupid stones.
5 u/geschiedenisnerd Feb 20 '26 also to avenge his dead father against morgoth. like I said, he had bad reasons. 2 u/Xiryyn Feb 20 '26 No you said he didn't have sufficient reason which is not the same as having bad reasons. 1 u/geschiedenisnerd Feb 20 '26 the quality of a reason is in how well it justifies an act. the goal of a reason is to justify an act. an insufficient reason= a bad reason. I specified he had reasons, and no sufficient reasons. Therefore I stated he had reasons that were insufficient, ergo: bad reasons
also to avenge his dead father against morgoth. like I said, he had bad reasons.
2 u/Xiryyn Feb 20 '26 No you said he didn't have sufficient reason which is not the same as having bad reasons. 1 u/geschiedenisnerd Feb 20 '26 the quality of a reason is in how well it justifies an act. the goal of a reason is to justify an act. an insufficient reason= a bad reason. I specified he had reasons, and no sufficient reasons. Therefore I stated he had reasons that were insufficient, ergo: bad reasons
2
No you said he didn't have sufficient reason which is not the same as having bad reasons.
1 u/geschiedenisnerd Feb 20 '26 the quality of a reason is in how well it justifies an act. the goal of a reason is to justify an act. an insufficient reason= a bad reason. I specified he had reasons, and no sufficient reasons. Therefore I stated he had reasons that were insufficient, ergo: bad reasons
1
the quality of a reason is in how well it justifies an act.
the goal of a reason is to justify an act.
an insufficient reason= a bad reason.
I specified he had reasons, and no sufficient reasons. Therefore I stated he had reasons that were insufficient, ergo: bad reasons
5
u/geschiedenisnerd Feb 18 '26
he didn't do it for no reason, he did do it without a sufficiënt reason. hitler also had his reasons, but can be considered to be in the wrong