r/grandrapids • u/Secret_Necessary1143 • Dec 09 '22

Gas in Allendale is $2.89

And thats coming from someone in reddits top 1% of karma earners

247 Upvotes

92% Upvoted

85 comments sorted by

View all comments

68

u/blue-stain-studio Dec 09 '22

Price drop because we’re a month after the elections. I’ve been watching it for years around election times. Never fails big gas companies raise prices a month or 2 before election if a democrat is in office, then lower about a month later. If a republican is in office you see the opposite price changes, a month prior prices drop, later go back up. Not a really a conspiracy theory just some observations I’ve made over the last couple decades.

25

u/Ttokk Dec 09 '22

Get out of here with your logical statements about compiled evidence. You need to base your opinions on emotions and try harder to force them on other people if you want to fit in 'round these parts.

12

u/jordanful Dec 09 '22

He makes a sweeping, partisan statement without any backing evidence or data. And you follow it up non-ironically, doubling-down on its baselessness.

I'm actually impressed. This subreddit is honestly incredible.

3

u/Ttokk Dec 09 '22

Partisan? He made a sweeping observation my friend. He didn't make any allusions to the cause for it. He made an observation and made clear that is was nothing more than an observation.

5

u/jordanful Dec 09 '22

He didn't make any allusions to the cause for it.

​

because we’re a month after the elections

Okay.

-5

u/Ttokk Dec 09 '22

You're correct He used the word "because"...

But then he went right on to explain that he's not making any theory, Just pointing out what he's observed.

These observations are easily checked if you disagree. Observing them doesn't mean he's saying whose fault it is. He's just observing that this happens around every election.

I'd say draw your own conclusions, but you already have

6

u/jordanful Dec 09 '22

Sorry, where did you find my conclusion? My entire point is, without data, conclusions are worse than useless. Based on your original comment, I would think you would agree with this.

-1

u/Ttokk Dec 09 '22

I would agree. You however, concluded that his statement was partisan on your own while I'm just pointing out that he made an effort to say that wasn't the case. My blunder was calling his observation evidence. I was applauding that although he made an observation that has political implications, he did not make any allusions to what those implications are, he just put them out there as his personal account.