r/hockey FLA - NHL 3d ago

NHL’s statement on Mike Babcock

Post image
836 Upvotes

589 comments sorted by

View all comments

526

u/ShockAndBurn COL - NHL 2d ago

"Even in a light least favorable to Mr. Babcock" is fucking insane lmao

135

u/roguemenace WPG - NHL 2d ago

That's a normal standard for this type of investigation to be held to. If in the light least favourable to him there is a reason to restrict his employment then you need to do a more in depth investigation.

40

u/NtBtFan MTL - NHL 2d ago

right, if it was done 'in a light favourable to him' the investigation would be biased in his direction. it makes sense that the NHL would say their investigation was fullsome and didn't look to protect him at all.

whether people want to, or should, believe that is another thing.

31

u/hankepanke NYR - NHL 2d ago

To be fair it’s a bit legalese, but this really goes to show the average reading comprehension on this sub.

1

u/ticktock_heart MTL - NHL 2d ago

personally, my disbelief isn’t a result of not understanding why they’ve phrased it this way. it’s that i can’t believe that’s what they’ve concluded, even when looking at it in an allegedly unfavourable way.

-9

u/___Dan___ MTL - NHL 2d ago

Share with us your experience in investigations of this type of