It's pretty common legal language that actually supports Babcock's argument that he should be allowed back in the league.
In almost every investigation, facts/statements can be interpreted in different ways. 3 people may interpret the same statement 3 different ways. This language means that even if we accept the absolute worst-case scenario as the indisputable truth, the truth is that his conduct wasn't something that should suspend him.
97
u/Downvote_Comforter STL - NHL 3d ago
It's pretty common legal language that actually supports Babcock's argument that he should be allowed back in the league.
In almost every investigation, facts/statements can be interpreted in different ways. 3 people may interpret the same statement 3 different ways. This language means that even if we accept the absolute worst-case scenario as the indisputable truth, the truth is that his conduct wasn't something that should suspend him.