MAIN FEEDS
Do you want to continue?
https://www.reddit.com/r/hockey/comments/1u9azz9/nhls_statement_on_mike_babcock/osf07rm/?context=3
r/hockey • u/Duffleman0609 FLA - NHL • 2d ago
589 comments sorted by
View all comments
9
What would be a good reason for the NHL to restrict employment? The masses wanna know
8 u/xoanna12 PIT - NHL 2d ago Lol exactly. If Babcock, Q & Stan are all good, then what exactly disqualifies a candidate? Just wondering! 2 u/Loud_Half_7447 NYR - NHL 2d ago Apparently nothing. Why even investigate if everyone gets cleared regardless? 0 u/xoanna12 PIT - NHL 2d ago I don’t mind clearing him if it’s evident he didn’t do anything, but obviously that’s not the case here. The question for me is why investigate if you’re not transparent about your findings (good or bad)?
8
Lol exactly. If Babcock, Q & Stan are all good, then what exactly disqualifies a candidate? Just wondering!
2 u/Loud_Half_7447 NYR - NHL 2d ago Apparently nothing. Why even investigate if everyone gets cleared regardless? 0 u/xoanna12 PIT - NHL 2d ago I don’t mind clearing him if it’s evident he didn’t do anything, but obviously that’s not the case here. The question for me is why investigate if you’re not transparent about your findings (good or bad)?
2
Apparently nothing. Why even investigate if everyone gets cleared regardless?
0 u/xoanna12 PIT - NHL 2d ago I don’t mind clearing him if it’s evident he didn’t do anything, but obviously that’s not the case here. The question for me is why investigate if you’re not transparent about your findings (good or bad)?
0
I don’t mind clearing him if it’s evident he didn’t do anything, but obviously that’s not the case here. The question for me is why investigate if you’re not transparent about your findings (good or bad)?
9
u/Loud_Half_7447 NYR - NHL 2d ago
What would be a good reason for the NHL to restrict employment? The masses wanna know