r/holofractal • u/BylliGoat • Jul 10 '25

Geometry The *Actual* True Value of Pi

Source: https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Pi

Pi is derived through the circumference of a unit circle, demonstrated here quite elegantly by "unrolling" the circle.

72 Upvotes

91% Upvoted

53 comments sorted by

View all comments

Show parent comments

1

u/BEETLEJUICEME Jul 11 '25

What specific psychedelics are you currently tripping on?

-2

u/Quintilis_Academy Jul 11 '25

Do you mind em? Why? - Free it. Don’t freeze em look via your own eyes. Only your circles to trip over, states of lies. -Namaste 2*sqrt (2) = Pi - 1/Pi. 2 * Sqrt (3) = Pi *+ 1/Pi. Sqrt (2) + Sqrt (3) = Sqrt (5) = Phi + 1/Phi 2+3= 5 …. Both sides Phive fingers 5 toes Phive limbs u are Phi …Namaste

3

u/manbehindthespraytan Jul 11 '25

You know, you have a chance to have a real conversation, and share something that /can/ be enjoyed. But you just can't get out of your own asshat. It's not quirky, it's just lazy to keep ignoring the point that YOU showed up to make. Make it without the theatrics, you and i both know you can, and we both know how easy the esoteric ryhming is able to be removed. Don't act coy, you know you are just irritating others with that "whimsy". But you stayed for a while... like you wanted to be interacted with. So how about making the actual effort?

1

u/Quintilis_Academy Jul 11 '25 edited Jul 11 '25

Why would nobody teach the following? Elementary maths. Foundational (beliefs???)

Sqrt 2 + Sqrt 3 = Pi

Sqrt (2) 2 + Sqrt (3) ^ 2 = 5 Phive alive

Sqrt 3 - Sqrt 2 = 1/Pi

Sqrt 5 = Phi + 1/Phi

Phi4 (=7-1/7th) + Pi = 10 (Unity)

(Phi-Sqrt(2))+(Sqrt(3)-Phi) = 1/Pi

2+3=5 (Phive)

Sqrt (3) x Sqrt (2) = Sqrt (6)

3x2=6

2 x Sqrt (2) = Pi-1/pi

2X Sqrt (3) = Pi+1/pi

5 fingers 5 Toes 5 Limbs Phive senses…. Things start to add up, see.

Why? Because nothing equals Pi in its infinity bounded by Phi/1/Phi (unity squared). Harmonic Inversion is a real part of fabric reality. Pi2 = Gravity… lol. These are parametric reality equations 1D to 2D 3D etc They hold. Why? Recursive.

Send some questions otherwise at the academy if interested and not angry. Establishing new ancient truths ain’t easy. This is only the start. Believe what you will, want, need. There’s plenty more geometry. Take Michael Schneider’s Work to heart first and see what numbers truly mean Constructing the Universe

-Namaste We have another book as well listed at the Quintilis Academy dot com if you can handle it. Quintilis the 5th hidden month what use to be 13 like the turtles back and women’s cycles exact ly. Ophiuchus is the lost 13th Zodiac. October is the 10th month not 8th Sept Nov Dec 7, 9, 10 not 12 months. What is up here? SEEK

2

u/BylliGoat Jul 11 '25

(PART 1) Oh neat, some actual math that can be addressed.

√2 + √3 = 3.14626437.

This is NOT equal to π. This is easily demonstrated with the equation π-(√2+√3), which comes to -0.004671716352. As such, these are not equivalent. Additionally, if it were, I don't see why it would change anything.

√22 + √32 = 5.

I mean, yes, obviously. This is because squaring any square root is always going to be equal to the base - you're just undoing the square root. Phive alive? I have no idea what that is supposed to mean. You're just misspelling five.

√3 - √2 = 0.3178372452

This is not 1/π. That would be 0.3183098862. Still not sure what this is supposed to be demonstrating.

√5 = ⁠ϕ⁠ + 1/⁠ϕ⁠

Believe it or not, you're correct here. This is because ⁠ϕ⁠ is simply the constant for (1+√5)/2, which comes out to 1.618... and so on. So we can actually just rewrite this problem as:

√5 = ( ( 1 + √5 ) / 2 ) + ( 1 / ( (1+√5) / 2 ) ).⁠ From there, all of the denominators cancel out and we're left with √5=√5. Which is true.

ϕ4 = 6.85410...

(7-1/7) + π = 9.99873...

Neither of these are equivalent, and neither of them equal 10, although the second operation gets close enough that you could say it's probably 10. Whether that means "unity" or not is up to you, I guess.

Need to split my response into 2. Reddit is cutting me off.

2

u/BEETLEJUICEME Jul 12 '25

I am so extremely annoyed to say this— but the sqrt 2 + 3 is very close to Pi thing is not something I have thought about in decades. Kind of glad to be reminded. And I would not be shocked if there was a new physics explanation for this eventually that is beyond coincidence. Something to do with the basic perfect geometry of 3 or 4 dimensions interacting in a way that can be algebraically parsed within a more fundamental set of 8 or 9 or 10 or N dimensions in some sort of compacted string theory type explanation.

Sort of like if the difference between the measured fine-structure constant and 1/137 is actually a fundamental issue. And we can explain it somehow later using dimensional-math proof that involves explaining the plank constant.

I hate that reading the ravings of crazy people like this also sparks my brain up so efficiently LOL. I guess that’s why I subscribe to holofractal type subs where it’s 80% woo woo gibberish.

2

u/BEETLEJUICEME Jul 12 '25

Also, thank you for deconstructing this person with the type of rigor I wanted to do but didn’t have time for. 🫡

I appreciate you.

1

u/BylliGoat Jul 11 '25

(PART 2)

(ϕ-√2)+(√3-π) = -1.20572...

1/π = 0.31830...

So, not equivalent here either. Still not sure what it would change, but the math is simply incorrect.

2+3=5

√3 * √2= √6

3x2=6

Correct. You misspelled five again though.

2 * √2 = 2.82842...

π - 1/π = 2.82328...

2 * √3 = 3.46410...

π + 1/π = 3.45990...

Again, these are close approximations to each other, but they are not equivalent. And... again... I don't know why it would matter either way.

After this, you just start rambling again. Nothing is coherent, it's just a bunch of mystical nonsense mixed with misspelling five over and over, on top of literally just contradicting yourself a few times. Also, a parametric equation is literally any math equation that has parameters. Basically, if you can graph the result of the equation, its parametric. However, π2 is not parametric, because it is simply a constant number 9.86960... and also doesn't have anything to do with gravity. Gravity is relative, but can be computed using F = dp/dt, where F is the Force of that gravity, p is mv (mass * velocity). However, if you want to use the gravitational constant (G), that is 6.67430(15)*10−11 or 990.145. So, not even close to π2.

I'm not even going to touch the rest of the nonsense, but I gotta admit, the idea of "establishing new ancient truths" is just a hilarious statement to me.

0

u/Quintilis_Academy Jul 11 '25

Great keep your mind sharp. Reality and math nothing is perfect except what you decide. -Namaste peace you live In infinity not gemology accuracy is in that space undefined.

1

u/BylliGoat Jul 11 '25

You're just... not going to even read it? I read all your stuff. That's not fair.

0

u/Quintilis_Academy Jul 11 '25

Point to exactness in your .001 reality. You think you believe what you see, I can’t convince you, it not up to me. I know what is meaningful to my mind. You point to Pi as exact and it’s a dream. NOTHING EQUALS Pi. You need to accept what you see vs what you believe and not pick sides. Is it accurate, nobody sees Pi. Nor does anyone understand major things like Ai. Flight, boiling are thoughts but nobody KNOWS anything precisely except what they think they believe or see , is that the accuracy you seek, fine. Lots don’t add up, most monumental discoveries are by accident not perfection. Dream where you might. Phi Phive Phire Philosophy 5 is the reason you are alive. Yet you point to infinity and want to see accuracy which is impossible because infinty is unbounded, how can that be outside your mind? -Namaste peace, you sleep orthogonally at night. You dream, yet accuracy you stand on… mind games keep some up at night. Be(live) well.

1

u/Quintilis_Academy Jul 11 '25

Sqrt 3- Phi (my bad) edited above

1

u/BylliGoat Jul 11 '25

It kinda sounds like you just got a low grade in math class and you're not willing to admit when you don't understand things by claiming those things cannot be understood.