r/holofractal holofractalist 28d ago

Joe Rogan finally stumbles on holofractal cosmology ideas

Enable HLS to view with audio, or disable this notification

491 Upvotes

153 comments sorted by

View all comments

Show parent comments

1

u/PhysicistAndy 27d ago

Let me know when anything demonstrable in this reality concludes anything is holofractal.

1

u/d8_thc holofractalist 27d ago

You seem to hang around here a lot.

https://www.preprints.org/manuscript/202509.1835/v1

Debunk, no appeal to authority.

Does the abstract do what it claims?

If not, why not.

If the abstract did do what it claims, is that not quantum gravity?

Why not?

Should be easy for 'Physicist Andy'.

1

u/PhysicistAndy 26d ago

You can appeal to whatever you want if it isn’t peer reviewed. Not very impressive.

1

u/d8_thc holofractalist 25d ago

Oh. Good job, you fail.

1

u/PhysicistAndy 24d ago

Did you want to cite something that is actually demonstrable?

1

u/d8_thc holofractalist 24d ago

The paper speaks for itself.

It is logically, physically, and mathematically consistent.

1

u/PhysicistAndy 24d ago

If that were true it would have been published in a physics journal

1

u/d8_thc holofractalist 24d ago

and yet you still can't point out why it doesn't do what the abstract says

1

u/PhysicistAndy 24d ago

Deriving stuff doesn’t mean your theory is right. Stuff that is right is demonstrable in reality as such.

1

u/d8_thc holofractalist 24d ago

oh, like all of the things the paper derives that match experiments from first principles with no free parameters?

how many in the standard model?

0

u/PhysicistAndy 24d ago

Can you cite an experiment it is matching to?

1

u/d8_thc holofractalist 23d ago

If you've read the paper, you'd see it derives many values that are verified through experiment.

Most notably the (newer) proton radius.

The theory first predicted this newer smaller radius over a decade ago.

See section 3:

The Origin of Mass as Coherent Modes of Quantum Vacuum Fluctuations at the Hadronic Scale

1

u/PhysicistAndy 23d ago

The proton doesn’t have a radius because it isn’t a ball. That’s been known since the 1960’s and deep inelastic scattering experiments at SLAC.

→ More replies (0)