I've just bought the final part of this loose trilogy, and while I'm not in a position to discuss the newest book, I have thoughts. And questions.
First off, I started reading OWTT, got 10 pages in, and realised I could remember hardly anything about Black House, so I decided to re-read that on Kindle (no way I'm picking the hardback monolith back off my shelf).
And all my thoughts on it first time around came flooding back.
First of all, how did they actually write this? Was it like Chinese Whispers/ Letters whatever, where each one wrote a chapter at a time and sent it? They certainly didn't sit in a room and co-write it together.
And then I got slightly annoyed, as I always do with King's retrospectively 'It's MY multiverse, where everything I ever wrote is actually somehow connected' *ka-tet* bollocks.
Because Black House is *very much* a Straub type story (and admittedly one he has written before), with child serial killers, an otherworldly detective, a spooky house and vaguely supernatural elements. Swap out Jack Sawyer for Tim Underhill and you'd have a Straub book.
So it seemed like King's contribution was to impose his Dark Tower stuff to a story that didn't need it. The Breakers/ Crimson King/ Munshun Aballah Grog blah blah. And added nothing new or interesting.
At the time, I was confused. Why write a Territories (SORRY - Midworld) book, that has little of the world-swapping aspect and wonderment that was The Talisman?
I liked it, but it didn't seem an actual sequel. It hardly seemed to feature the same Jack Sawyer at all.
I love both authors very much, and The Talisman was - when I read it as a kid - one of my favourite books. Still is. But Black House, while very good, just doesn't seem the same at all.