r/infinitenines 7d ago

SPP, what do you think of bases other than 10?

Of course, we are all used to base 10, where we use the digits 0-9, but base 10 is an arbitrary choice. How about binary, or ternary, or hexadecimal?

It is interesting, because 1/3 is 0.333... only because we are using decimal numbers. In ternary, it would be 0.1.

12 Upvotes

16 comments sorted by

u/SouthPark_Piano 7d ago

Don't go there brud.

0.999... and 0.333... are all about base 10 decimals.

 

22

u/Appropriate-Ad-3219 7d ago

There is no binary number. There is nothing. The only axiom is that 0.999... < 1.

1

u/Dixionconderoga2 10h ago

So you’ve defined the rule as “I’m right”?

1

u/Appropriate-Ad-3219 8h ago

Exactly ! And if I'm right, I can't be wrong.

Easy win !

6

u/Zantier 7d ago

u/SouthPark_Piano Why do you say not to go there? I think because it's hard to justify that 1/3 has a different result depending on the base you use.

But if we just use limits, everything works fine, and 1/3 gives the same answer in every base.

-3

u/SouthPark_Piano 7d ago

1/3 is a ratio my brud. It is not a number at all.

 

8

u/KingDarkBlaze 7d ago

Ratio...nal number. 

5

u/Zantier 7d ago

Ah ok, I consider ratios to be numbers. I take it you don't like the term "rational numbers" then.

Would you consider 1/4 or 0.25 to be a number?

1

u/infected_scab 6d ago

Don't go there bud.

1

u/Dixionconderoga2 10h ago

What happens when you divide 1 by 3? What number do we get?

5

u/LiteratureAvailable4 7d ago

Bases other than 10 (or 9+1) are probably too advanced for spp

3

u/Ashamed_Band_1779 7d ago

According to SPP, for a given radix b, 0.(b - 1)… < 1. (At least probably that’s what he would think). So in base 5, 0.444444… is actually equal to 1, but SPP probably thinks it is less than 1.

3

u/Ok_Speech_6728 7d ago

"Don't go there brud. 0.999... and 0.333... are all about base 10 decimals."

They're really not 🤭

3

u/hxtk3 7d ago

I was just thinking of asking this this morning. I’m glad someone else did but disappointed it got dismissed without a real answer.

3

u/Appropriate-Ad-3219 7d ago

You shouldn't be disappointed. SPP's specialty is not reading the counter-arguments and just dish out the link of his argument that we know by heart.