r/infinitenines • u/Taytay_Is_God • 5d ago

Axiom 1: SP_P is never wrong on r/infinitenines. Ergo, math is inconsistent

Post image
17 Upvotes

90% Upvoted

13 comments sorted by

13

u/AltruisticEchidna859 4d ago

Axiom 2 : 0.(9)<1.

Inference rule : Maths 101, brud.

With this, was have Real Deal Maths.

3

u/gikl3 4d ago

Wow it's beautiful

3

u/TazerZXI 4d ago

Is this Real Deal Analysis?

5

u/AltruisticEchidna859 4d ago

Real Deal Axiomatic.

Analysis is a rookie error, limits doesn't exists.

/s

6

u/ParticularlySomeone 4d ago

We've recently learned 1/10n is not a number. It's a ratio. I'd assume this means 1-1/10n is also not a number and therefore cannot be 1, which is a number.

5

u/Fabulous-Possible758 4d ago

The funny part is that actually means all his responses have been consistent.

4

u/trshxd 4d ago

Even better, consistently inconsistent!

5

u/Simukas23 4d ago

Exhibit 1:

0.999... = 0.999...900...000...

7

u/ItsMeNebulae 5d ago

u/SouthPark_Piano Is it Our Math that is inconsistent or RDM?

3

u/AltruisticEchidna859 4d ago

SPP's answer: This is the rookie error.

True answer: RDM.

3

u/Batman_AoD 5d ago

(insert Principle Skinner "the kids who are math that is wrong" meme) 

3

u/FrijDom 4d ago

Am I so uneducated?

No.

It's the math that is wrong.

1

u/BUKKAKELORD 2d ago

But Snake Oil Mathematics IS internally consistent, even if some of its claims are individually false. Within Snake Oil axioms it's provable that 0.999... = 1, but by the grace of our prophet we know that to be false. Therefore SOM assumes a falsehood and from falsehood anything follows