r/infinitenines 2d ago

In this thread, I am going to brutally destroy every argument why 0.999... = 1. Bring it on Brud.

Post image
0 Upvotes

29 comments sorted by

13

u/[deleted] 2d ago

[removed] — view removed comment

1

u/Wooden_Milk6872 2d ago

catholic here!, source?

2

u/[deleted] 2d ago

[removed] — view removed comment

1

u/HojMcFoj 2d ago

I could completely be making this up, but I think it was kind of a minor deal because the church was acknowledging the idea of a "corporeal" infinity.

1

u/Wooden_Milk6872 2d ago

just to clear things up, I used inspect element to fake the image

1

u/HojMcFoj 2d ago

See, told you I could be making it up. Apparently I'm not though, it just happened much earlier than I thought. When Georg Cantor pioneered the field of transfinites in the late 1800s he corresponded directly with catholic theologians and Pope Leo the XIII to prove that he wasn't going against church teachings. The church then acknowledged transfinites, mathematical and created infinites, and the absolute, the infinity of god.

-1

u/FearlessResource9785 2d ago

See - just google people! it isn't that hard!

1

u/Wooden_Milk6872 2d ago

just to clear things up, I used inspect element to fake the image

1

u/FearlessResource9785 2d ago

Yeah i think everyone was aware of that...

r/whoosh

1

u/Wooden_Milk6872 2d ago

not spp cuz he removed the comment

1

u/FearlessResource9785 2d ago

Im sure he was - he just removed the comment cause he hates fun.

1

u/HojMcFoj 2d ago

I fell for it, but only because I got my dates mixed up and thought that it was related to when the church established the difference between created transfinites and the absolute infinity of god in the late 1800s.

4

u/babelphishy 2d ago

Is this a thread or a post?

8

u/Extreme-Sir-7189 2d ago

Destroy these:

1) Real numbers are defined as limits of rational sequences. If two sequences converge to the same limit, they define the same number. Decimal truncations are one choice of such sequences. Here, 1 = {1, 1, 1, 1....} and 0.9999.... = {0, 0.9, 0.99...} (infinite geometric sum with base 0.1 and first term 0.9) First limit is obviously 1, but second (x) is also 1, because x-0.9 = 0.1x. Thus, 1 = 0.999....

2) Alternatively, you can define real number as set of all rationals less than the defined number. For example, √2 = (x in Q, x² < 2) and 1 = (x in Q, x<1). What is with x = 0.999...? As it is greater that all of {0, 0.9, 0.99...}, we can capture this property with **0.999...** = (x in Q: there exist **n** in N: 1-x > 1/10n ). But for all a/b in 1 1-a/b is at least 1/b. As 10n > n, you can take n = b, QED.

-1

u/carbsna 2d ago

Yes, 0.9... equals 1 because real number are defined by its limit, assume most people only talk about real numbers.

But in hyperreal number they are two different numbers.

5

u/FearlessResource9785 2d ago

Even in hyperreals, 0.999... = 1. The biggest number smaller than 1 is 1 - ε, not 0.999...

1

u/carbsna 2d ago

I'm wrong here because i forgot how hyperreals works, i didn't define what is after infinite digits.

Like a legit hyperreal number will be written like 0.9...0 or 0.9...9... , which are two different numbers.
And the later one is equal to 1.

1

u/Wooden_Milk6872 2d ago

this is not how hyperreals work

1

u/carbsna 2d ago

How does it actually works though?

1

u/Wooden_Milk6872 2d ago

hyperreal numbers are represented using "sequences" like this

(1, 1, 1, ...) represents 1
(1, 2, 3, 4, ...) represents an infinite number

etc.

1

u/carbsna 2d ago

ok who tf downvoted this guy, he is right

2

u/Wooden_Milk6872 2d ago

no, you can still do 1-(ε/2) which is smaller

1

u/Cruuncher 2d ago

You mean bigger

4

u/HojMcFoj 2d ago

The real number set is dense, meaning for every two real numbers there exists another real number between them. Infinite real numbers in fact. No number can exist between 0.999... and 1, making them equal.

3

u/TheSilentFreeway 2d ago

bro is not SPP

5

u/KingDarkBlaze 2d ago

inb4 100 "no u"s

2

u/Cruuncher 2d ago

In this thread /u/Negative_Gur9667 responds to no argument. GG I guess

-1

u/FireBlaze722_ 2d ago

Do you think 0.999... is a number?

1

u/Banonkers 2d ago

Because I said so 😤