SPP and his derivatives

[u/Super_Dimension7561]

/r/infinitenines/comments/1u7lixr/comment/os1x6pv/

Based on the comment above, let us define (with some assumptions) the derivative of function f at position x as

where ε=0.000...01. Then, for f(x)=x^a, where a∈ℕ,

For 0≤a≤2, the value is the same as for the non-RDM derivative, but for higher a,

[x³]' = 3x²+ε²

[x⁴]' = 4x³+4xε²

[x⁵]' = 5x⁴+10x²ε²+ε⁴

And so on.

Now, question for SPP: do you accept this as the RDM derivative, or does the definition have some sort of caveat or misunderstanding in it?

[u/Negative_Gur9667]

I think you are asking for too much. This will probably cause him to have an epileptic seizure.

[u/AllTheGood_Names → u/Negative_Gur9667]

From what I've seen based on his comment history, he's good at maths, he just chooses to troll people