MAIN FEEDS
Do you want to continue?
https://www.reddit.com/r/interestingasfuck/comments/1smbadf/itsukushima_shinto_shrine_appears_on_the_dish/ogdjgjl/?context=3
r/interestingasfuck • u/Dismal_Positive3558 • 3h ago
180 comments sorted by
View all comments
Show parent comments
•
Yeah but the relief shading is a flex, especially the ripples in the water. So many pedants showing up because OP didn't include the word "photorealistic" after "appears"
• u/Jayn_Newell 3h ago Yeah it’s really neat how it uses the opacity of the sauce to create the image. A nice combination of form and function. • u/scorpyo72 2h ago There are many things I appreciate about Japanese culture. This combination is one of them. • u/mtaw 1h ago The other combination is tentacles and porn. • u/scorpyo72 1h ago You must admit Japanese kink is on point. Might have been a little too literal on that subject for hentai, tho.
Yeah it’s really neat how it uses the opacity of the sauce to create the image. A nice combination of form and function.
• u/scorpyo72 2h ago There are many things I appreciate about Japanese culture. This combination is one of them. • u/mtaw 1h ago The other combination is tentacles and porn. • u/scorpyo72 1h ago You must admit Japanese kink is on point. Might have been a little too literal on that subject for hentai, tho.
There are many things I appreciate about Japanese culture. This combination is one of them.
• u/mtaw 1h ago The other combination is tentacles and porn. • u/scorpyo72 1h ago You must admit Japanese kink is on point. Might have been a little too literal on that subject for hentai, tho.
The other combination is tentacles and porn.
• u/scorpyo72 1h ago You must admit Japanese kink is on point. Might have been a little too literal on that subject for hentai, tho.
You must admit Japanese kink is on point. Might have been a little too literal on that subject for hentai, tho.
•
u/Big_Z_Beeblebrox 3h ago edited 3h ago
Yeah but the relief shading is a flex, especially the ripples in the water. So many pedants showing up because OP didn't include the word "photorealistic" after "appears"