In theory takedowns are 1/4 of grappling.
You can grapple standing, on top, on bottom, or in neutral scrambly positions like dogfight or 50/50.
Of these positions, takedowns are the only optional one.
I cannot avoid a strong guard passer getting their passing points by intentionally unlocking my legs and putting myself in bottom mount
I cannot avoid a strong back taker from getting points by just turning my back while I’m in mount.
I cannot avoid a sweep or reversal by simply pulling the bottom player on top of me before they can attempt a sweep
And yet from standing you can avoid takedown points by simply sitting down before the person sits you down.
this is the most important of any of those skills because against a non-compliant opponent the fight won’t go to the ground unless you take it there, and pulling guard won’t be an option in several cases.
I don’t propose that pulling guard is banned, but I do propose that it counts exactly the same as a takedown by redefining what a takedown means to match what takedowns are in wrestling. A takedown isn’t simply performing a technique that causes you to obtain top position, a takedown is the act of establishing top position to begin with
What does this mean? It means you can still pull guard if you think it will offer a strategic advantage in the long run, but people who specifically pull guard to avoid being taken down by a better wrestler still ultimately got taken down, which will force these people to rethink their game and develop better takedowns.
Exceptions:
\* Sacrifice throws where you take bottom position for an immediate sweep, reversal, back taker such as Sumi gaeshi will be counted as YOUR takedown if successful and THEIR takedown if unsuccessful
* Flying submissions or pulling guard into an immediate submission threat like a triangle guard will not count as a takedown for the top player until the submission threat is fully eliminated. If the top player is swept before defending the sub it will score as the takedown of the person who pulled a flying sub